单孔切口-体外常规器械-内镜手术治疗盲肠后急性阑尾炎可行吗?

Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Pub Date : 2013-08-01 Epub Date: 2013-07-25 DOI:10.4174/jkss.2013.85.2.80
Suleyman Cuneyt Karakus, Huseyin Kilincaslan, Naim Koku, Idris Ertaskin
{"title":"单孔切口-体外常规器械-内镜手术治疗盲肠后急性阑尾炎可行吗?","authors":"Suleyman Cuneyt Karakus,&nbsp;Huseyin Kilincaslan,&nbsp;Naim Koku,&nbsp;Idris Ertaskin","doi":"10.4174/jkss.2013.85.2.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Since laparoscopic appendectomy was first described, various modifications, such as single port incisionless-intracorporeal conventional equipment-endoscopic surgery (SPICES), have been described for reducing pain and improving cosmetic results. In the retrocecal and retrocolic positions, attachments to the lateral peritoneum and cecum may lead to difficulties during SPICES, which is performed with only one port. Here, we present the effects of variations in the position of the vermiform appendix in treating acute appendicitis with SPICES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 52 children who underwent SPICES for acute appendicitis between March 2010 and November 2011 in our institution. One group (group A) consisted of 30 patients (mean age, 10.5 ± 2.5 years) with retrocecal appendix, while the other group (group B) included 22 patients (mean age, 10.9 ± 2.3 years) with the appendix lying free in the peritoneal cavity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between groups in terms of patient age, gender, success rate of SPICES, mean operating time, mean follow-up period, overall complication rates or mean postoperative hospitalization period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that SPICES is a safe and feasible approach even in patients with retrocecal acute appendicitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","volume":"85 2","pages":"80-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.2.80","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is single port incisionless-intracorporeal conventional equipment-endoscopic surgery feasible in patients with retrocecal acute appendicitis?\",\"authors\":\"Suleyman Cuneyt Karakus,&nbsp;Huseyin Kilincaslan,&nbsp;Naim Koku,&nbsp;Idris Ertaskin\",\"doi\":\"10.4174/jkss.2013.85.2.80\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Since laparoscopic appendectomy was first described, various modifications, such as single port incisionless-intracorporeal conventional equipment-endoscopic surgery (SPICES), have been described for reducing pain and improving cosmetic results. In the retrocecal and retrocolic positions, attachments to the lateral peritoneum and cecum may lead to difficulties during SPICES, which is performed with only one port. Here, we present the effects of variations in the position of the vermiform appendix in treating acute appendicitis with SPICES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 52 children who underwent SPICES for acute appendicitis between March 2010 and November 2011 in our institution. One group (group A) consisted of 30 patients (mean age, 10.5 ± 2.5 years) with retrocecal appendix, while the other group (group B) included 22 patients (mean age, 10.9 ± 2.3 years) with the appendix lying free in the peritoneal cavity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between groups in terms of patient age, gender, success rate of SPICES, mean operating time, mean follow-up period, overall complication rates or mean postoperative hospitalization period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that SPICES is a safe and feasible approach even in patients with retrocecal acute appendicitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society\",\"volume\":\"85 2\",\"pages\":\"80-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.2.80\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.2.80\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.2.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:自从腹腔镜阑尾切除术首次被描述以来,各种修改,如单口切口-体内常规设备-内窥镜手术(香料),已经被描述为减轻疼痛和改善美容效果。在盲肠后位和结肠后位,附着于外侧腹膜和盲肠可能导致香料时的困难,这是只有一个端口进行。在这里,我们提出的影响变化的位置蚓状阑尾治疗急性阑尾炎与香料。方法:回顾性分析2010年3月至2011年11月在本院接受香料治疗急性阑尾炎的52例患儿。其中A组为盲肠后阑尾患者30例(平均年龄10.5±2.5岁),B组为阑尾游离腹腔患者22例(平均年龄10.9±2.3岁)。结果:两组患者在年龄、性别、手术成功率、平均手术时间、平均随访时间、总并发症发生率、平均术后住院时间等方面差异无统计学意义。结论:香料治疗盲肠后急性阑尾炎是一种安全可行的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is single port incisionless-intracorporeal conventional equipment-endoscopic surgery feasible in patients with retrocecal acute appendicitis?

Is single port incisionless-intracorporeal conventional equipment-endoscopic surgery feasible in patients with retrocecal acute appendicitis?

Purpose: Since laparoscopic appendectomy was first described, various modifications, such as single port incisionless-intracorporeal conventional equipment-endoscopic surgery (SPICES), have been described for reducing pain and improving cosmetic results. In the retrocecal and retrocolic positions, attachments to the lateral peritoneum and cecum may lead to difficulties during SPICES, which is performed with only one port. Here, we present the effects of variations in the position of the vermiform appendix in treating acute appendicitis with SPICES.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 52 children who underwent SPICES for acute appendicitis between March 2010 and November 2011 in our institution. One group (group A) consisted of 30 patients (mean age, 10.5 ± 2.5 years) with retrocecal appendix, while the other group (group B) included 22 patients (mean age, 10.9 ± 2.3 years) with the appendix lying free in the peritoneal cavity.

Results: There were no significant differences between groups in terms of patient age, gender, success rate of SPICES, mean operating time, mean follow-up period, overall complication rates or mean postoperative hospitalization period.

Conclusion: These results suggest that SPICES is a safe and feasible approach even in patients with retrocecal acute appendicitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信