日常肿瘤学实践中的生活质量和症状评价:150例接受姑息性化疗的晚期胃肠道肿瘤患者的调查。

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine
Onkologie Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-01-28 DOI:10.1159/000346670
Katharina Schultheis, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Deniz Gencer, James A Blunk, Justus Benrath
{"title":"日常肿瘤学实践中的生活质量和症状评价:150例接受姑息性化疗的晚期胃肠道肿瘤患者的调查。","authors":"Katharina Schultheis,&nbsp;Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz,&nbsp;Deniz Gencer,&nbsp;James A Blunk,&nbsp;Justus Benrath","doi":"10.1159/000346670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality of life (QoL) is frequently investigated as a secondary endpoint in clinical trials but is rarely evaluated in clinical practice. The present survey sought to assess the QoL of patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumours receiving palliative chemotherapy. Furthermore, we wanted to compare the results of subscales of the generic EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire, version 3.0) using assessment tools with an emphasis on pain and depression.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>150 patients with gastrointestinal tumours undergoing palliative chemotherapy completed 3 questionnaires. QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, Beck depression inventory (BDI) was utilised to measure the severity of patients' depression and a visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied to measure patient's pain intensity. Correlations between these assessments were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey revealed that treatment of pain and depression appeared to be inadequate in the present cohort of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. Good correlations between EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales and the VAS (r = 0.86), as well as the BDI (r = 0.63) were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present analysis indicates the need for better symptom control regarding the examples 'pain' and 'depression'. In view of the good correlation between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the BDI and VAS, further studies on the implementation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 as a screening tool, or for follow-up measurements in daily practice are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19684,"journal":{"name":"Onkologie","volume":"36 1-2","pages":"33-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000346670","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life and symptom evaluation in daily oncology practice: a survey of 150 patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumours receiving palliative chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Schultheis,&nbsp;Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz,&nbsp;Deniz Gencer,&nbsp;James A Blunk,&nbsp;Justus Benrath\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000346670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality of life (QoL) is frequently investigated as a secondary endpoint in clinical trials but is rarely evaluated in clinical practice. The present survey sought to assess the QoL of patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumours receiving palliative chemotherapy. Furthermore, we wanted to compare the results of subscales of the generic EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire, version 3.0) using assessment tools with an emphasis on pain and depression.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>150 patients with gastrointestinal tumours undergoing palliative chemotherapy completed 3 questionnaires. QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, Beck depression inventory (BDI) was utilised to measure the severity of patients' depression and a visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied to measure patient's pain intensity. Correlations between these assessments were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey revealed that treatment of pain and depression appeared to be inadequate in the present cohort of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. Good correlations between EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales and the VAS (r = 0.86), as well as the BDI (r = 0.63) were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present analysis indicates the need for better symptom control regarding the examples 'pain' and 'depression'. In view of the good correlation between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the BDI and VAS, further studies on the implementation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 as a screening tool, or for follow-up measurements in daily practice are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Onkologie\",\"volume\":\"36 1-2\",\"pages\":\"33-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000346670\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Onkologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000346670\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000346670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:生活质量(QoL)在临床试验中经常作为次要终点进行研究,但在临床实践中很少进行评估。本研究旨在评估接受姑息性化疗的晚期胃肠道肿瘤患者的生活质量。此外,我们想比较通用EORTC QLQ-C30(欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织,生活质量问卷,3.0版)的子量表结果,使用评估工具,重点是疼痛和抑郁。患者与方法:150例接受姑息性化疗的胃肠道肿瘤患者填写3份问卷。采用EORTC QLQ-C30量表评估患者的生活质量,采用贝克抑郁量表(BDI)评估患者的抑郁程度,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估患者的疼痛程度。计算这些评估之间的相关性。结果:调查显示,在目前的转移性胃肠道癌症患者队列中,疼痛和抑郁的治疗似乎是不够的。EORTC QLQ-C30量表与VAS (r = 0.86)、BDI (r = 0.63)有较好的相关性。结论:以“疼痛”和“抑郁”为例,需加强症状控制。鉴于EORTC QLQ-C30与BDI和VAS之间具有良好的相关性,因此有必要进一步研究将EORTC QLQ-C30作为筛查工具的实施,或在日常实践中进行随访测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of life and symptom evaluation in daily oncology practice: a survey of 150 patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumours receiving palliative chemotherapy.

Background: Quality of life (QoL) is frequently investigated as a secondary endpoint in clinical trials but is rarely evaluated in clinical practice. The present survey sought to assess the QoL of patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumours receiving palliative chemotherapy. Furthermore, we wanted to compare the results of subscales of the generic EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire, version 3.0) using assessment tools with an emphasis on pain and depression.

Patients and methods: 150 patients with gastrointestinal tumours undergoing palliative chemotherapy completed 3 questionnaires. QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, Beck depression inventory (BDI) was utilised to measure the severity of patients' depression and a visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied to measure patient's pain intensity. Correlations between these assessments were calculated.

Results: The survey revealed that treatment of pain and depression appeared to be inadequate in the present cohort of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. Good correlations between EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales and the VAS (r = 0.86), as well as the BDI (r = 0.63) were found.

Conclusion: The present analysis indicates the need for better symptom control regarding the examples 'pain' and 'depression'. In view of the good correlation between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the BDI and VAS, further studies on the implementation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 as a screening tool, or for follow-up measurements in daily practice are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Onkologie
Onkologie 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信