导航与传统交叉关节损伤内固定:可行性和准确性。

Q Medicine
Computer Aided Surgery Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-02-04 DOI:10.3109/10929088.2013.766264
Timo Stübig, Torsten Jähnisch, Maximilian Petri, Nael Hawi, Christian Zeckey, Christian Krettek, Musa Citak, Rupert Meller
{"title":"导航与传统交叉关节损伤内固定:可行性和准确性。","authors":"Timo Stübig,&nbsp;Torsten Jähnisch,&nbsp;Maximilian Petri,&nbsp;Nael Hawi,&nbsp;Christian Zeckey,&nbsp;Christian Krettek,&nbsp;Musa Citak,&nbsp;Rupert Meller","doi":"10.3109/10929088.2013.766264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transfixation of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is a well-established technique for treating Rockwood IV to VI lesions. However, several complications, including pin breakage or pin migration due to incorrect placement, have been reported in the literature. A cadaveric study was performed to investigate whether the use of 3D navigation might improve the accuracy of AC joint transfixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen transfixations of the AC joint (8 non-navigated, 9 navigated) were performed minimally invasively in cadaveric shoulders. For the navigated procedures, a 3D C-arm (Ziehm Vision FD Vario 3D) and a navigation system (BrainLab VectorVision) were used. Reference markers were attached to the spina scapulae, then a 3D scan was performed and the data transferred to the navigation system. Two Kirschner wires (K-wires) were placed either freehand under fluoroscopic control (in the non-navigated group) or with the use of a navigated drill guide. Radiological analysis was performed with OsiriX software, measuring the distance of the K-wires from the center of the AC joint. For statistical analysis, Student's t-test was performed, with the significance level being set to p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum distance of the K-wires from the center of the AC joint was 5.4 ± 1.1 mm for the freehand non-navigated group and 3.1 ± 1.6 mm for the navigated group (p = 0.0054). The minimum distance of the K-wires from the AC joint center was 3.0 ± 0.6 mm for the freehand group and 1.6 ± 0.6 mm for the navigated group (p = 0.0002). The radiation time was significant lower for the freehand group (41.25 ± 20.4 seconds versus 79.5 ± 13.3 seconds for the navigated group, p = 0.004). There was no statistical difference between the groups with respect to the time required for surgery (11.25 ± 3.6 min for the freehand group and 12.6 ± 4.6 min for the navigated group; p = 0.475). In the freehand group, the AC joint was penetrated by both K-wires in 87.5% of the procedures, compared to 100% in the navigated group. Both K-wires were placed completely intraosseously in the clavicula in 50% of the procedures in the freehand group, compared to 88% in the navigated group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three-dimensional navigation may improve the accuracy of AC joint transfixation techniques. However, the radiation time is increased when using the navigated procedure, while the overall operation time remains comparable. Nevertheless, a 3D C-arm with a variable isocentric design is recommended for the acquisition of the shoulder scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":50644,"journal":{"name":"Computer Aided Surgery","volume":"18 3-4","pages":"68-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10929088.2013.766264","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigated versus conventional transfixation of AC joint injuries: feasibility and accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"Timo Stübig,&nbsp;Torsten Jähnisch,&nbsp;Maximilian Petri,&nbsp;Nael Hawi,&nbsp;Christian Zeckey,&nbsp;Christian Krettek,&nbsp;Musa Citak,&nbsp;Rupert Meller\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10929088.2013.766264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transfixation of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is a well-established technique for treating Rockwood IV to VI lesions. However, several complications, including pin breakage or pin migration due to incorrect placement, have been reported in the literature. A cadaveric study was performed to investigate whether the use of 3D navigation might improve the accuracy of AC joint transfixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen transfixations of the AC joint (8 non-navigated, 9 navigated) were performed minimally invasively in cadaveric shoulders. For the navigated procedures, a 3D C-arm (Ziehm Vision FD Vario 3D) and a navigation system (BrainLab VectorVision) were used. Reference markers were attached to the spina scapulae, then a 3D scan was performed and the data transferred to the navigation system. Two Kirschner wires (K-wires) were placed either freehand under fluoroscopic control (in the non-navigated group) or with the use of a navigated drill guide. Radiological analysis was performed with OsiriX software, measuring the distance of the K-wires from the center of the AC joint. For statistical analysis, Student's t-test was performed, with the significance level being set to p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum distance of the K-wires from the center of the AC joint was 5.4 ± 1.1 mm for the freehand non-navigated group and 3.1 ± 1.6 mm for the navigated group (p = 0.0054). The minimum distance of the K-wires from the AC joint center was 3.0 ± 0.6 mm for the freehand group and 1.6 ± 0.6 mm for the navigated group (p = 0.0002). The radiation time was significant lower for the freehand group (41.25 ± 20.4 seconds versus 79.5 ± 13.3 seconds for the navigated group, p = 0.004). There was no statistical difference between the groups with respect to the time required for surgery (11.25 ± 3.6 min for the freehand group and 12.6 ± 4.6 min for the navigated group; p = 0.475). In the freehand group, the AC joint was penetrated by both K-wires in 87.5% of the procedures, compared to 100% in the navigated group. Both K-wires were placed completely intraosseously in the clavicula in 50% of the procedures in the freehand group, compared to 88% in the navigated group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three-dimensional navigation may improve the accuracy of AC joint transfixation techniques. However, the radiation time is increased when using the navigated procedure, while the overall operation time remains comparable. Nevertheless, a 3D C-arm with a variable isocentric design is recommended for the acquisition of the shoulder scans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Aided Surgery\",\"volume\":\"18 3-4\",\"pages\":\"68-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10929088.2013.766264\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Aided Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10929088.2013.766264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Aided Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10929088.2013.766264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:肩锁关节内固定术是治疗Rockwood IV至VI型病变的一种成熟技术。然而,一些并发症,包括针断裂或针移位由于不正确的放置,已在文献中报道。我们进行了一项尸体研究,以探讨使用3D导航是否可以提高交流关节内固定的准确性。方法:对17例尸体肩部AC关节(非导航8例,导航9例)行微创内固定。在导航过程中,使用了3D c型臂(Ziehm Vision FD Vario 3D)和导航系统(BrainLab VectorVision)。参考标记附着在脊柱肩胛骨上,然后进行3D扫描并将数据传输到导航系统。两根克氏针(k -丝)在透视镜控制下徒手放置(非导航组)或使用导航钻导器。使用OsiriX软件进行放射学分析,测量k线到交流关节中心的距离。统计分析采用Student’st检验,显著性水平设为p。结果:徒手无导航组k线距交流关节中心最大距离为5.4±1.1 mm,导航组k线距交流关节中心最大距离为3.1±1.6 mm (p = 0.0054)。徒手组k -丝距交流关节中心的最小距离为3.0±0.6 mm,导航组为1.6±0.6 mm (p = 0.0002)。徒手组的放射时间明显低于导航组(41.25±20.4 s vs . 79.5±13.3 s, p = 0.004)。两组手术所需时间(徒手组为11.25±3.6 min,导航组为12.6±4.6 min)差异无统计学意义;p = 0.475)。在徒手组中,87.5%的手术中,两根k针穿透AC关节,而在导航组中,这一比例为100%。徒手组50%的手术将两根克氏针完全置入锁骨内,而导航组则为88%。结论:三维导航可提高交流关节内固定技术的准确性。然而,当使用导航程序时,辐射时间增加,而总体操作时间保持可比。然而,建议使用可变等心设计的3D c型臂进行肩部扫描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigated versus conventional transfixation of AC joint injuries: feasibility and accuracy.

Objective: Transfixation of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is a well-established technique for treating Rockwood IV to VI lesions. However, several complications, including pin breakage or pin migration due to incorrect placement, have been reported in the literature. A cadaveric study was performed to investigate whether the use of 3D navigation might improve the accuracy of AC joint transfixation.

Methods: Seventeen transfixations of the AC joint (8 non-navigated, 9 navigated) were performed minimally invasively in cadaveric shoulders. For the navigated procedures, a 3D C-arm (Ziehm Vision FD Vario 3D) and a navigation system (BrainLab VectorVision) were used. Reference markers were attached to the spina scapulae, then a 3D scan was performed and the data transferred to the navigation system. Two Kirschner wires (K-wires) were placed either freehand under fluoroscopic control (in the non-navigated group) or with the use of a navigated drill guide. Radiological analysis was performed with OsiriX software, measuring the distance of the K-wires from the center of the AC joint. For statistical analysis, Student's t-test was performed, with the significance level being set to p < 0.05.

Results: The maximum distance of the K-wires from the center of the AC joint was 5.4 ± 1.1 mm for the freehand non-navigated group and 3.1 ± 1.6 mm for the navigated group (p = 0.0054). The minimum distance of the K-wires from the AC joint center was 3.0 ± 0.6 mm for the freehand group and 1.6 ± 0.6 mm for the navigated group (p = 0.0002). The radiation time was significant lower for the freehand group (41.25 ± 20.4 seconds versus 79.5 ± 13.3 seconds for the navigated group, p = 0.004). There was no statistical difference between the groups with respect to the time required for surgery (11.25 ± 3.6 min for the freehand group and 12.6 ± 4.6 min for the navigated group; p = 0.475). In the freehand group, the AC joint was penetrated by both K-wires in 87.5% of the procedures, compared to 100% in the navigated group. Both K-wires were placed completely intraosseously in the clavicula in 50% of the procedures in the freehand group, compared to 88% in the navigated group.

Conclusion: Three-dimensional navigation may improve the accuracy of AC joint transfixation techniques. However, the radiation time is increased when using the navigated procedure, while the overall operation time remains comparable. Nevertheless, a 3D C-arm with a variable isocentric design is recommended for the acquisition of the shoulder scans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Aided Surgery
Computer Aided Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.75
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Computer Aided Surgery encompasses all fields within surgery, as well as biomedical imaging and instrumentation, and digital technology employed as an adjunct to imaging in diagnosis, therapeutics, and surgery. Topics featured include frameless as well as conventional stereotaxic procedures, surgery guided by ultrasound, image guided focal irradiation, robotic surgery, and other therapeutic interventions that are performed with the use of digital imaging technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信