转诊实验室的囊性纤维化检测:六年来的结果和经验教训。

Perry G Ridge, Christine Miller, Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir, D Hunter Best, Rong Mao, Jeffrey J Swensen, Elaine Lyon, Karl V Voelkerding
{"title":"转诊实验室的囊性纤维化检测:六年来的结果和经验教训。","authors":"Perry G Ridge, Christine Miller, Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir, D Hunter Best, Rong Mao, Jeffrey J Swensen, Elaine Lyon, Karl V Voelkerding","doi":"10.1186/2043-9113-3-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong></p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The recent introduction of high throughput sequencing technologies into clinical genetics has made it practical to simultaneously sequence many genes. In contrast, previous technologies limited sequencing based tests to only a handful of genes. While the ability to more accurately diagnose inherited diseases is a great benefit it introduces specific challenges. Interpretation of missense mutations continues to be challenging and the number of variants of uncertain significance continues to grow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We leveraged the data available at ARUP Laboratories, a major reference laboratory, for the CFTR gene to explore specific challenges related to variant interpretation, including a focus on understanding ethnic-specific variants and an evaluation of existing databases for clinical interpretation of variants. In this study we analyzed 555 patients representing eight different ethnic groups. We observed 184 different variants, most of which were ethnic group specific. Eighty-five percent of these variants were present in the Cystic Fibrosis Mutation Database, whereas the Human Mutation Database and dbSNP/1000 Genomes had far fewer of the observed variants. Finally, 21 of the variants were novel and we report these variants and their clinical classifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our analyses of data from six years of CFTR testing at ARUP Laboratories a more comprehensive, clinical grade database is needed for the accurate interpretation of observed variants. Furthermore, there is a particular need for more and better information regarding variants from individuals of non-Caucasian ethnicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical bioinformatics","volume":" ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cystic fibrosis testing in a referral laboratory: results and lessons from a six-year period.\",\"authors\":\"Perry G Ridge, Christine Miller, Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir, D Hunter Best, Rong Mao, Jeffrey J Swensen, Elaine Lyon, Karl V Voelkerding\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/2043-9113-3-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong></p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The recent introduction of high throughput sequencing technologies into clinical genetics has made it practical to simultaneously sequence many genes. In contrast, previous technologies limited sequencing based tests to only a handful of genes. While the ability to more accurately diagnose inherited diseases is a great benefit it introduces specific challenges. Interpretation of missense mutations continues to be challenging and the number of variants of uncertain significance continues to grow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We leveraged the data available at ARUP Laboratories, a major reference laboratory, for the CFTR gene to explore specific challenges related to variant interpretation, including a focus on understanding ethnic-specific variants and an evaluation of existing databases for clinical interpretation of variants. In this study we analyzed 555 patients representing eight different ethnic groups. We observed 184 different variants, most of which were ethnic group specific. Eighty-five percent of these variants were present in the Cystic Fibrosis Mutation Database, whereas the Human Mutation Database and dbSNP/1000 Genomes had far fewer of the observed variants. Finally, 21 of the variants were novel and we report these variants and their clinical classifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our analyses of data from six years of CFTR testing at ARUP Laboratories a more comprehensive, clinical grade database is needed for the accurate interpretation of observed variants. Furthermore, there is a particular need for more and better information regarding variants from individuals of non-Caucasian ethnicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563502/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-3-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-3-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无标签:背景:最近,临床遗传学引入了高通量测序技术,使同时对许多基因进行测序成为可能。相比之下,以前的技术只能对少数几个基因进行测序检测。虽然能够更准确地诊断遗传性疾病是一项巨大的优势,但也带来了特殊的挑战。对错义突变的解释仍然具有挑战性,意义不确定的变异数量也在不断增加:我们利用主要参考实验室 ARUP 实验室提供的 CFTR 基因数据来探讨与变异解释相关的具体挑战,包括重点了解种族特异性变异和评估现有的变异临床解释数据库。在这项研究中,我们分析了代表八个不同种族群体的 555 名患者。我们观察到了 184 种不同的变异,其中大部分是特定种族群体的变异。其中 85% 的变异出现在囊性纤维化突变数据库中,而人类突变数据库和 dbSNP/1000 基因组中观察到的变异要少得多。最后,21 个变异是新型的,我们报告了这些变异及其临床分类:根据我们对 ARUP 实验室六年 CFTR 检测数据的分析,需要一个更全面的临床级数据库来准确解释观察到的变异。此外,还特别需要更多更好的非白种人变异信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cystic fibrosis testing in a referral laboratory: results and lessons from a six-year period.

Unlabelled:

Background: The recent introduction of high throughput sequencing technologies into clinical genetics has made it practical to simultaneously sequence many genes. In contrast, previous technologies limited sequencing based tests to only a handful of genes. While the ability to more accurately diagnose inherited diseases is a great benefit it introduces specific challenges. Interpretation of missense mutations continues to be challenging and the number of variants of uncertain significance continues to grow.

Results: We leveraged the data available at ARUP Laboratories, a major reference laboratory, for the CFTR gene to explore specific challenges related to variant interpretation, including a focus on understanding ethnic-specific variants and an evaluation of existing databases for clinical interpretation of variants. In this study we analyzed 555 patients representing eight different ethnic groups. We observed 184 different variants, most of which were ethnic group specific. Eighty-five percent of these variants were present in the Cystic Fibrosis Mutation Database, whereas the Human Mutation Database and dbSNP/1000 Genomes had far fewer of the observed variants. Finally, 21 of the variants were novel and we report these variants and their clinical classifications.

Conclusions: Based on our analyses of data from six years of CFTR testing at ARUP Laboratories a more comprehensive, clinical grade database is needed for the accurate interpretation of observed variants. Furthermore, there is a particular need for more and better information regarding variants from individuals of non-Caucasian ethnicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信