在脊柱手术中使用rhBMP:有致癌风险吗?

John G Devine, Joseph R Dettori, John C France, Erika Brodt, Robert A McGuire
{"title":"在脊柱手术中使用rhBMP:有致癌风险吗?","authors":"John G Devine,&nbsp;Joseph R Dettori,&nbsp;John C France,&nbsp;Erika Brodt,&nbsp;Robert A McGuire","doi":"10.1055/s-0031-1298616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong> Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Study rationale: </strong> Some have noted several safety issues associated with the use of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), including cancer risk, stating both BMP and their receptors had been isolated from human tumors. In addition, data presented to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the product AMPLIFY™ (rhBMP-2, 40 mg) revealed a higher number of cancers in the investigational group compared with the control.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> To independently review the cancer risk of rhBMP-2 use in spine fusion as published in the peer-reviewed literature and in the publicly available FDA data summaries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A systematic review of the literature was undertaken for articles published through January 2012. Pubmed, Cochrane, National Guideline Clearinghouse Databases as well as bibliographies of key articles were searched. Two independent reviewers revised articles. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set and each article was subjected to a predefined quality-rating scheme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Five published peer-reviewed studies and two FDA safety summaries reported the occurrence of cancer in patients treated with spinal fusion using rhBMP-2 or rhBMP-7. Cancer data for on-label use of rhBMP-2 (InFUSE™) were reported in the FDA data summary but not in one published pivotal study. The risk of cancer was same in both the rhBMP-2 and control groups, 0.7% after 24 months. Off-label use of rhBMP for posterolateral fusion (PLF) was associated with a slightly higher risk of cancer compared with controls in three randomized controlled trials and one poorly conducted retrospective cohort study at various follow-ups. In PLF the risk of cancer was 3.8% using 40 mg of BMP-2 compared with 0.9% in the control group. Two RCTs evaluating rhBMP-7 reported a cancer risk of 12.5% and 5.6% in the rhBMP-7 group compared with 8.3% and 0% in the control groups, respectively. The differences in these studies were not statistically significant; however, the sample sizes for these studies were small.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Cancer risk with BMP-2 may be dose dependent, illustrating the need to continue to study this technology and obtain longer follow-up on patients currently enrolled in the FDA trials. Additionally, refined guidelines regarding the routine use of BMPs should be developed, taking into account the FDA summary data that is not routinely scrutinized by the practicing surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":89675,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based spine-care journal","volume":"3 2","pages":"35-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1298616","citationCount":"105","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of rhBMP in spine surgery: is there a cancer risk?\",\"authors\":\"John G Devine,&nbsp;Joseph R Dettori,&nbsp;John C France,&nbsp;Erika Brodt,&nbsp;Robert A McGuire\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0031-1298616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong> Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Study rationale: </strong> Some have noted several safety issues associated with the use of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), including cancer risk, stating both BMP and their receptors had been isolated from human tumors. In addition, data presented to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the product AMPLIFY™ (rhBMP-2, 40 mg) revealed a higher number of cancers in the investigational group compared with the control.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> To independently review the cancer risk of rhBMP-2 use in spine fusion as published in the peer-reviewed literature and in the publicly available FDA data summaries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A systematic review of the literature was undertaken for articles published through January 2012. Pubmed, Cochrane, National Guideline Clearinghouse Databases as well as bibliographies of key articles were searched. Two independent reviewers revised articles. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set and each article was subjected to a predefined quality-rating scheme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Five published peer-reviewed studies and two FDA safety summaries reported the occurrence of cancer in patients treated with spinal fusion using rhBMP-2 or rhBMP-7. Cancer data for on-label use of rhBMP-2 (InFUSE™) were reported in the FDA data summary but not in one published pivotal study. The risk of cancer was same in both the rhBMP-2 and control groups, 0.7% after 24 months. Off-label use of rhBMP for posterolateral fusion (PLF) was associated with a slightly higher risk of cancer compared with controls in three randomized controlled trials and one poorly conducted retrospective cohort study at various follow-ups. In PLF the risk of cancer was 3.8% using 40 mg of BMP-2 compared with 0.9% in the control group. Two RCTs evaluating rhBMP-7 reported a cancer risk of 12.5% and 5.6% in the rhBMP-7 group compared with 8.3% and 0% in the control groups, respectively. The differences in these studies were not statistically significant; however, the sample sizes for these studies were small.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Cancer risk with BMP-2 may be dose dependent, illustrating the need to continue to study this technology and obtain longer follow-up on patients currently enrolled in the FDA trials. Additionally, refined guidelines regarding the routine use of BMPs should be developed, taking into account the FDA summary data that is not routinely scrutinized by the practicing surgeon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based spine-care journal\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"35-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1298616\",\"citationCount\":\"105\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based spine-care journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based spine-care journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 105

摘要

研究设计:系统评价。研究理由:一些人注意到与使用骨形态发生蛋白(BMP)相关的几个安全问题,包括癌症风险,称BMP及其受体已经从人类肿瘤中分离出来。此外,向美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)提交的关于产品AMPLIFY™(rhBMP-2, 40 mg)的数据显示,与对照组相比,研究组的癌症数量更高。目的:对发表在同行评议文献和可公开获得的FDA数据摘要中的脊柱融合术中使用rhBMP-2的癌症风险进行独立评估。方法:对截至2012年1月发表的文献进行系统综述。检索Pubmed、Cochrane、National guidelines Clearinghouse数据库以及关键文章的参考书目。两位独立审稿人修改了文章。设定纳入和排除标准,并对每篇文章进行预先确定的质量评定方案。结果:五项已发表的同行评议研究和两项FDA安全性总结报告了使用rhBMP-2或rhBMP-7进行脊柱融合治疗的患者发生癌症的情况。标签上使用rhBMP-2 (InFUSE™)的癌症数据已在FDA数据摘要中报告,但未在一项已发表的关键研究中报告。24个月后,rhBMP-2组和对照组患癌症的风险相同,为0.7%。在三项随机对照试验和一项在各种随访中进行的回顾性队列研究中,非标签使用rhBMP进行后外侧融合(PLF)与对照组相比,癌症风险略高。在PLF中,使用40毫克BMP-2的癌症风险为3.8%,而对照组为0.9%。两项评估rhBMP-7的随机对照试验报告,rhBMP-7组的癌症风险分别为12.5%和5.6%,而对照组的风险分别为8.3%和0%。这些研究的差异无统计学意义;然而,这些研究的样本量很小。结论:BMP-2的癌症风险可能是剂量依赖性的,说明有必要继续研究这项技术,并对目前参加FDA试验的患者进行更长时间的随访。此外,应制定关于常规使用bmp的改进指南,考虑到执业外科医生不定期审查的FDA汇总数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The use of rhBMP in spine surgery: is there a cancer risk?

The use of rhBMP in spine surgery: is there a cancer risk?

The use of rhBMP in spine surgery: is there a cancer risk?

Study design:  Systematic review.

Study rationale:  Some have noted several safety issues associated with the use of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), including cancer risk, stating both BMP and their receptors had been isolated from human tumors. In addition, data presented to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the product AMPLIFY™ (rhBMP-2, 40 mg) revealed a higher number of cancers in the investigational group compared with the control.

Objective:  To independently review the cancer risk of rhBMP-2 use in spine fusion as published in the peer-reviewed literature and in the publicly available FDA data summaries.

Methods:  A systematic review of the literature was undertaken for articles published through January 2012. Pubmed, Cochrane, National Guideline Clearinghouse Databases as well as bibliographies of key articles were searched. Two independent reviewers revised articles. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set and each article was subjected to a predefined quality-rating scheme.

Results:  Five published peer-reviewed studies and two FDA safety summaries reported the occurrence of cancer in patients treated with spinal fusion using rhBMP-2 or rhBMP-7. Cancer data for on-label use of rhBMP-2 (InFUSE™) were reported in the FDA data summary but not in one published pivotal study. The risk of cancer was same in both the rhBMP-2 and control groups, 0.7% after 24 months. Off-label use of rhBMP for posterolateral fusion (PLF) was associated with a slightly higher risk of cancer compared with controls in three randomized controlled trials and one poorly conducted retrospective cohort study at various follow-ups. In PLF the risk of cancer was 3.8% using 40 mg of BMP-2 compared with 0.9% in the control group. Two RCTs evaluating rhBMP-7 reported a cancer risk of 12.5% and 5.6% in the rhBMP-7 group compared with 8.3% and 0% in the control groups, respectively. The differences in these studies were not statistically significant; however, the sample sizes for these studies were small.

Conclusions:  Cancer risk with BMP-2 may be dose dependent, illustrating the need to continue to study this technology and obtain longer follow-up on patients currently enrolled in the FDA trials. Additionally, refined guidelines regarding the routine use of BMPs should be developed, taking into account the FDA summary data that is not routinely scrutinized by the practicing surgeon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信