现场可部署的近实时光学微流体生物传感器用于现场水样中单卵囊水平的细小隐孢子虫检测。

Journal of Environmental Monitoring Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-11-14 DOI:10.1039/c2em30700f
Scott V Angus, Hyuck-Jin Kwon, Jeong-Yeol Yoon
{"title":"现场可部署的近实时光学微流体生物传感器用于现场水样中单卵囊水平的细小隐孢子虫检测。","authors":"Scott V Angus,&nbsp;Hyuck-Jin Kwon,&nbsp;Jeong-Yeol Yoon","doi":"10.1039/c2em30700f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cryptosporidium spp. is an obligate, parasitic protozoan that is difficult to detect and causes diarrhea in healthy adults while potentially causing death in the immunocompromised and children. Its treatment options are few and treat the symptoms, not the actual parasite. Current methods of detection are inefficient and rely too heavily upon laboratory sample preparations and technician skill, including differential staining, negative staining, and immunofluorescence methods [especially U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 1623]. These assays can take from hours to days and require a laboratory environment. In this work, we demonstrated the microbead immunoagglutination assay combined with Mie scatter detection in a microfluidic device to provide a field-deployable and near-real-time alternative to the laboratory-based method (especially EPA Method 1623). Two main challenges were the relatively big diameter of Cryptosporidium oocysts (5-6 μm) and the contaminants in field water samples that negatively affected the immunoagglutination and its scatter detection. We used 4 min sonication to liberate Cryptosporidium oocyst wall proteins (COWP), which was previously used to inactivate Cryptosporidium oocysts. As for the contaminants, we optimized the microbead diameter (920 nm) and the wavelength of incident light (375 nm) to find the angle of scatter detection (45°) where the Mie scatter from immunoagglutinated microbeads was maximum and the background scatter from contaminants was minimum. This enabled the sub-single-oocyst-level detection despite the fact that only a very small volume of water sample (15 μL) was introduced to the microfluidic biosensor. When combined with filtration/concentration, this method is able to detect ≤1 oocyst per large volume of water, comparable to or potentially better than the EPA method 1623, while effectively reducing the time and labor necessary for staining and microscopic analysis. For faster, near-real-time assays, filtration/concentration may not be used, where the detection limit was 1-10 oocysts per mL with the total assay time of 10 min including the 4 min sonication time. The linear range of assay was over 5 orders of magnitude. The final device was compact and had the potential to be used in field situations, and required less technical expertise and/or training compared to the other methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":50202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1039/c2em30700f","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field-deployable and near-real-time optical microfluidic biosensors for single-oocyst-level detection of Cryptosporidium parvum from field water samples.\",\"authors\":\"Scott V Angus,&nbsp;Hyuck-Jin Kwon,&nbsp;Jeong-Yeol Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/c2em30700f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cryptosporidium spp. is an obligate, parasitic protozoan that is difficult to detect and causes diarrhea in healthy adults while potentially causing death in the immunocompromised and children. Its treatment options are few and treat the symptoms, not the actual parasite. Current methods of detection are inefficient and rely too heavily upon laboratory sample preparations and technician skill, including differential staining, negative staining, and immunofluorescence methods [especially U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 1623]. These assays can take from hours to days and require a laboratory environment. In this work, we demonstrated the microbead immunoagglutination assay combined with Mie scatter detection in a microfluidic device to provide a field-deployable and near-real-time alternative to the laboratory-based method (especially EPA Method 1623). Two main challenges were the relatively big diameter of Cryptosporidium oocysts (5-6 μm) and the contaminants in field water samples that negatively affected the immunoagglutination and its scatter detection. We used 4 min sonication to liberate Cryptosporidium oocyst wall proteins (COWP), which was previously used to inactivate Cryptosporidium oocysts. As for the contaminants, we optimized the microbead diameter (920 nm) and the wavelength of incident light (375 nm) to find the angle of scatter detection (45°) where the Mie scatter from immunoagglutinated microbeads was maximum and the background scatter from contaminants was minimum. This enabled the sub-single-oocyst-level detection despite the fact that only a very small volume of water sample (15 μL) was introduced to the microfluidic biosensor. When combined with filtration/concentration, this method is able to detect ≤1 oocyst per large volume of water, comparable to or potentially better than the EPA method 1623, while effectively reducing the time and labor necessary for staining and microscopic analysis. For faster, near-real-time assays, filtration/concentration may not be used, where the detection limit was 1-10 oocysts per mL with the total assay time of 10 min including the 4 min sonication time. The linear range of assay was over 5 orders of magnitude. The final device was compact and had the potential to be used in field situations, and required less technical expertise and/or training compared to the other methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Monitoring\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1039/c2em30700f\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30700f\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/11/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30700f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

隐孢子虫是一种专性的寄生原生动物,很难发现,在健康成人中引起腹泻,而在免疫功能低下者和儿童中可能导致死亡。它的治疗选择很少,而且治疗的是症状,而不是真正的寄生虫。目前的检测方法效率低下,过于依赖实验室样品制备和技术人员的技能,包括鉴别染色、阴性染色和免疫荧光方法[特别是美国环境保护署(EPA)方法1623]。这些检测可能需要数小时到数天,并且需要实验室环境。在这项工作中,我们展示了在微流控装置中结合微珠免疫凝集试验和Mie散射检测,为基于实验室的方法(特别是EPA方法1623)提供了一种现场可部署和近实时的替代方法。隐孢子虫卵囊直径较大(5 ~ 6 μm)和野外水样中污染物对免疫凝集及其散射检测产生不利影响是两个主要挑战。我们用4 min超声释放隐孢子虫卵囊壁蛋白(Cryptosporidium oo囊肿wall protein, COWP),该蛋白以前用于灭活隐孢子虫卵囊。对于污染物,我们优化了微珠直径(920 nm)和入射光波长(375 nm),找到了免疫凝集微珠Mie散射最大、污染物背景散射最小的散射检测角度(45°)。这使得亚单卵囊水平的检测成为可能,尽管事实上只有非常小体积的水样(15 μL)被引入到微流体生物传感器。当与过滤/浓缩相结合时,该方法能够检测到每大体积水中≤1个卵囊,与EPA方法1623相当或可能更好,同时有效地减少了染色和显微镜分析所需的时间和人工。对于更快的、接近实时的检测,可能不使用过滤/浓缩,其中检测限为每mL 1-10个卵囊,总检测时间为10分钟,包括4分钟的超声时间。测定结果线性范围在5个数量级以上。最后的装置结构紧凑,具有在现场使用的潜力,与其他方法相比,所需的技术专长和/或培训较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Field-deployable and near-real-time optical microfluidic biosensors for single-oocyst-level detection of Cryptosporidium parvum from field water samples.

Cryptosporidium spp. is an obligate, parasitic protozoan that is difficult to detect and causes diarrhea in healthy adults while potentially causing death in the immunocompromised and children. Its treatment options are few and treat the symptoms, not the actual parasite. Current methods of detection are inefficient and rely too heavily upon laboratory sample preparations and technician skill, including differential staining, negative staining, and immunofluorescence methods [especially U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 1623]. These assays can take from hours to days and require a laboratory environment. In this work, we demonstrated the microbead immunoagglutination assay combined with Mie scatter detection in a microfluidic device to provide a field-deployable and near-real-time alternative to the laboratory-based method (especially EPA Method 1623). Two main challenges were the relatively big diameter of Cryptosporidium oocysts (5-6 μm) and the contaminants in field water samples that negatively affected the immunoagglutination and its scatter detection. We used 4 min sonication to liberate Cryptosporidium oocyst wall proteins (COWP), which was previously used to inactivate Cryptosporidium oocysts. As for the contaminants, we optimized the microbead diameter (920 nm) and the wavelength of incident light (375 nm) to find the angle of scatter detection (45°) where the Mie scatter from immunoagglutinated microbeads was maximum and the background scatter from contaminants was minimum. This enabled the sub-single-oocyst-level detection despite the fact that only a very small volume of water sample (15 μL) was introduced to the microfluidic biosensor. When combined with filtration/concentration, this method is able to detect ≤1 oocyst per large volume of water, comparable to or potentially better than the EPA method 1623, while effectively reducing the time and labor necessary for staining and microscopic analysis. For faster, near-real-time assays, filtration/concentration may not be used, where the detection limit was 1-10 oocysts per mL with the total assay time of 10 min including the 4 min sonication time. The linear range of assay was over 5 orders of magnitude. The final device was compact and had the potential to be used in field situations, and required less technical expertise and/or training compared to the other methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Monitoring
Journal of Environmental Monitoring 环境科学-分析化学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信