早产儿吸入一氧化氮。

Marilee C Allen, Pamela Donohue, Maureen Gilmore, Elizabeth Cristofalo, Renee F Wilson, Jonathan Z Weiner, Karen Robinson
{"title":"早产儿吸入一氧化氮。","authors":"Marilee C Allen,&nbsp;Pamela Donohue,&nbsp;Maureen Gilmore,&nbsp;Elizabeth Cristofalo,&nbsp;Renee F Wilson,&nbsp;Jonathan Z Weiner,&nbsp;Karen Robinson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically review the evidence on the use of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in preterm infants born at or before 34 weeks gestation age who receive respiratory support.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies (CENTRAL) and PsycInfo in June 2010. We also searched the proceedings of the 2009 and 2010 Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting and ClinicalTrials.gov. We identified additional studies from reference lists of eligible articles and relevant reviews, as well as from technical experts.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Questions were developed in collaboration with technical experts, including the chair of the upcoming National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research Consensus Development Conference. We limited our review to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the question of survival or occurrence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and for the question on short-term risks. All study designs were considered for long-term pulmonary or neurodevelopmental outcomes, and for questions about whether outcomes varied by subpopulation or by intervention characteristics. Two investigators independently screened search results, and abstracted data from eligible articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 14 RCTs, reported in 23 articles, and eight observational studies. Mortality rates in the NICU did not differ for infants treated with iNO versus those not treated with iNO (RR 0.97 (95% CI 0.82, 1.15)). BPD at 36 weeks for iNO and control groups also did not differ (RR 0.93 (0.86, 1.003) for survivors). A small difference was found between iNO and control infants in the composite outcome of death or BPD (RR 0.93 (0.87, 0.99)). There was inconsistent evidence about the risk of brain injury from individual RCTs, but meta-analyses showed no difference between iNO and control groups. We found no evidence of differences in other short term risks. There was no evidence to suggest a difference in the incidence of cerebral palsy (RR 1.36 (0.88, 2.10)), neurodevelopmental impairment (RR 0.91 (0.77, 1.12)), or cognitive impairment (RR 0.72 (0.35, 1.45)). Evidence was limited on whether the effect of iNO varies by subpopulation or by characteristics of the therapy (timing, dose and duration, mode of delivery, or concurrent therapies).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a seven percent reduction in the risk of the composite outcome of death or BPD at 36 weeks PMA for infants treated with iNO compared to controls, but no reduction in death or BPD alone. Further studies are needed to explore particular subgroups of infants and to assess long term outcomes including function in childhood. There is currently no evidence to support the use of iNO in preterm infants with respiratory failure outside the context of rigorously conducted randomized clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":72991,"journal":{"name":"Evidence report/technology assessment","volume":" 195","pages":"1-315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants.\",\"authors\":\"Marilee C Allen,&nbsp;Pamela Donohue,&nbsp;Maureen Gilmore,&nbsp;Elizabeth Cristofalo,&nbsp;Renee F Wilson,&nbsp;Jonathan Z Weiner,&nbsp;Karen Robinson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically review the evidence on the use of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in preterm infants born at or before 34 weeks gestation age who receive respiratory support.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies (CENTRAL) and PsycInfo in June 2010. We also searched the proceedings of the 2009 and 2010 Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting and ClinicalTrials.gov. We identified additional studies from reference lists of eligible articles and relevant reviews, as well as from technical experts.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Questions were developed in collaboration with technical experts, including the chair of the upcoming National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research Consensus Development Conference. We limited our review to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the question of survival or occurrence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and for the question on short-term risks. All study designs were considered for long-term pulmonary or neurodevelopmental outcomes, and for questions about whether outcomes varied by subpopulation or by intervention characteristics. Two investigators independently screened search results, and abstracted data from eligible articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 14 RCTs, reported in 23 articles, and eight observational studies. Mortality rates in the NICU did not differ for infants treated with iNO versus those not treated with iNO (RR 0.97 (95% CI 0.82, 1.15)). BPD at 36 weeks for iNO and control groups also did not differ (RR 0.93 (0.86, 1.003) for survivors). A small difference was found between iNO and control infants in the composite outcome of death or BPD (RR 0.93 (0.87, 0.99)). There was inconsistent evidence about the risk of brain injury from individual RCTs, but meta-analyses showed no difference between iNO and control groups. We found no evidence of differences in other short term risks. There was no evidence to suggest a difference in the incidence of cerebral palsy (RR 1.36 (0.88, 2.10)), neurodevelopmental impairment (RR 0.91 (0.77, 1.12)), or cognitive impairment (RR 0.72 (0.35, 1.45)). Evidence was limited on whether the effect of iNO varies by subpopulation or by characteristics of the therapy (timing, dose and duration, mode of delivery, or concurrent therapies).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a seven percent reduction in the risk of the composite outcome of death or BPD at 36 weeks PMA for infants treated with iNO compared to controls, but no reduction in death or BPD alone. Further studies are needed to explore particular subgroups of infants and to assess long term outcomes including function in childhood. There is currently no evidence to support the use of iNO in preterm infants with respiratory failure outside the context of rigorously conducted randomized clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence report/technology assessment\",\"volume\":\" 195\",\"pages\":\"1-315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781012/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence report/technology assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence report/technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:系统回顾在妊娠34周或之前接受呼吸支持的早产儿中使用吸入型一氧化氮(iNO)的证据。数据来源:我们检索了2010年6月的MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies (Central)和PsycInfo。我们还检索了2009年和2010年儿科学术学会会议和ClinicalTrials.gov的会议记录。我们从符合条件的文章和相关综述的参考文献列表以及技术专家中确定了其他研究。审查方法:问题是与技术专家合作制定的,包括即将召开的美国国立卫生研究院医学应用研究共识发展会议的主席。我们将综述限制在随机对照试验(rct)中,以研究支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的生存或发生问题以及短期风险问题。所有的研究设计都考虑了长期的肺或神经发育结果,以及结果是否因亚群或干预特征而变化的问题。两位研究者独立筛选搜索结果,并从符合条件的文章中提取数据。结果:我们共纳入了23篇报道的14项随机对照试验和8项观察性研究。新生儿重症监护室中接受iNO治疗的婴儿与未接受iNO治疗的婴儿的死亡率没有差异(RR 0.97 (95% CI 0.82, 1.15))。存活组和对照组在36周时的BPD也没有差异(RR为0.93(0.86,1.003))。在死亡或BPD的综合结局方面,iNO婴儿与对照组婴儿之间存在微小差异(RR 0.93(0.87, 0.99))。个别随机对照试验中关于脑损伤风险的证据不一致,但荟萃分析显示iNO组和对照组之间没有差异。我们没有发现其他短期风险的差异。没有证据表明脑瘫(RR 1.36(0.88, 2.10))、神经发育障碍(RR 0.91(0.77, 1.12))或认知障碍(RR 0.72(0.35, 1.45))的发生率有差异。关于iNO的效果是否因亚群或治疗特征(时间、剂量和持续时间、给药方式或同时治疗)而异的证据有限。结论:与对照组相比,接受iNO治疗的婴儿在分娩前36周死亡或BPD的综合结局风险降低了7%,但单独死亡或BPD的风险没有降低。需要进一步的研究来探索特定的婴儿亚群,并评估包括儿童功能在内的长期结果。目前没有证据支持在严格进行的随机临床试验之外的早产儿呼吸衰竭中使用iNO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants.

Objectives: To systematically review the evidence on the use of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in preterm infants born at or before 34 weeks gestation age who receive respiratory support.

Data sources: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies (CENTRAL) and PsycInfo in June 2010. We also searched the proceedings of the 2009 and 2010 Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting and ClinicalTrials.gov. We identified additional studies from reference lists of eligible articles and relevant reviews, as well as from technical experts.

Review methods: Questions were developed in collaboration with technical experts, including the chair of the upcoming National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research Consensus Development Conference. We limited our review to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the question of survival or occurrence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and for the question on short-term risks. All study designs were considered for long-term pulmonary or neurodevelopmental outcomes, and for questions about whether outcomes varied by subpopulation or by intervention characteristics. Two investigators independently screened search results, and abstracted data from eligible articles.

Results: We identified a total of 14 RCTs, reported in 23 articles, and eight observational studies. Mortality rates in the NICU did not differ for infants treated with iNO versus those not treated with iNO (RR 0.97 (95% CI 0.82, 1.15)). BPD at 36 weeks for iNO and control groups also did not differ (RR 0.93 (0.86, 1.003) for survivors). A small difference was found between iNO and control infants in the composite outcome of death or BPD (RR 0.93 (0.87, 0.99)). There was inconsistent evidence about the risk of brain injury from individual RCTs, but meta-analyses showed no difference between iNO and control groups. We found no evidence of differences in other short term risks. There was no evidence to suggest a difference in the incidence of cerebral palsy (RR 1.36 (0.88, 2.10)), neurodevelopmental impairment (RR 0.91 (0.77, 1.12)), or cognitive impairment (RR 0.72 (0.35, 1.45)). Evidence was limited on whether the effect of iNO varies by subpopulation or by characteristics of the therapy (timing, dose and duration, mode of delivery, or concurrent therapies).

Conclusions: There was a seven percent reduction in the risk of the composite outcome of death or BPD at 36 weeks PMA for infants treated with iNO compared to controls, but no reduction in death or BPD alone. Further studies are needed to explore particular subgroups of infants and to assess long term outcomes including function in childhood. There is currently no evidence to support the use of iNO in preterm infants with respiratory failure outside the context of rigorously conducted randomized clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信