Sally E Jensen, Jennifer L Beaumont, Paul B Jacobsen, Amy Abernethy, Karen L Syrjala, David Cella
{"title":"测量晚期膀胱癌的优先症状:一个简短症状指数的发展和初步验证。","authors":"Sally E Jensen, Jennifer L Beaumont, Paul B Jacobsen, Amy Abernethy, Karen L Syrjala, David Cella","doi":"10.1016/j.suponc.2012.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improved measurement of clinically meaningful symptoms is needed in advanced bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study developed and examined the initial reliability and validity of a new measure of advanced bladder cancer-specific symptoms, the NCCN-FACT Bladder Symptom Index-18 (NFBISI-18), which assesses the symptoms perceived as most important by patients and oncology clinical experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 31 individuals with advanced bladder cancer rated the importance of 28 symptoms. In addition, 10 oncology clinical experts rated symptoms as treatment- or disease-related. Patient-rated symptoms were reconciled with published clinicians' symptom priorities, producing the NFBISI-18. Participants completed measures of quality of life (QOL) and performance status to examine initial validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An 18-item symptom index for advanced bladder cancer included 3 subscales: disease-related symptoms, treatment side effects, and general function/well-being. Lower scores indicate greater symptom burden. Preliminary reliability reveals good internal consistency for the full NFBISI-18 (alpha = 0.83). The NFBISI-18 was significantly associated with QOL criteria and performance status, in the expected direction.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limitations include the cross-sectional design and the relatively low reliability of the disease-related symptoms subscale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NFBISI-18 demonstrates preliminary evidence as a valid brief measure of the most important symptoms of advanced bladder cancer, as rated by both patients and oncology clinical experts. The NFBISI-18 should have greater acceptability to regulatory authorities than previously developed questionnaires.</p>","PeriodicalId":75116,"journal":{"name":"The journal of supportive oncology","volume":"11 2","pages":"86-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886785/pdf/nihms954343.pdf","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring priority symptoms in advanced bladder cancer: development and initial validation of a brief symptom index.\",\"authors\":\"Sally E Jensen, Jennifer L Beaumont, Paul B Jacobsen, Amy Abernethy, Karen L Syrjala, David Cella\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suponc.2012.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improved measurement of clinically meaningful symptoms is needed in advanced bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study developed and examined the initial reliability and validity of a new measure of advanced bladder cancer-specific symptoms, the NCCN-FACT Bladder Symptom Index-18 (NFBISI-18), which assesses the symptoms perceived as most important by patients and oncology clinical experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 31 individuals with advanced bladder cancer rated the importance of 28 symptoms. In addition, 10 oncology clinical experts rated symptoms as treatment- or disease-related. Patient-rated symptoms were reconciled with published clinicians' symptom priorities, producing the NFBISI-18. Participants completed measures of quality of life (QOL) and performance status to examine initial validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An 18-item symptom index for advanced bladder cancer included 3 subscales: disease-related symptoms, treatment side effects, and general function/well-being. Lower scores indicate greater symptom burden. Preliminary reliability reveals good internal consistency for the full NFBISI-18 (alpha = 0.83). The NFBISI-18 was significantly associated with QOL criteria and performance status, in the expected direction.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limitations include the cross-sectional design and the relatively low reliability of the disease-related symptoms subscale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NFBISI-18 demonstrates preliminary evidence as a valid brief measure of the most important symptoms of advanced bladder cancer, as rated by both patients and oncology clinical experts. The NFBISI-18 should have greater acceptability to regulatory authorities than previously developed questionnaires.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of supportive oncology\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"86-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886785/pdf/nihms954343.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of supportive oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.07.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.07.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measuring priority symptoms in advanced bladder cancer: development and initial validation of a brief symptom index.
Background: Improved measurement of clinically meaningful symptoms is needed in advanced bladder cancer.
Objective: This study developed and examined the initial reliability and validity of a new measure of advanced bladder cancer-specific symptoms, the NCCN-FACT Bladder Symptom Index-18 (NFBISI-18), which assesses the symptoms perceived as most important by patients and oncology clinical experts.
Methods: A total of 31 individuals with advanced bladder cancer rated the importance of 28 symptoms. In addition, 10 oncology clinical experts rated symptoms as treatment- or disease-related. Patient-rated symptoms were reconciled with published clinicians' symptom priorities, producing the NFBISI-18. Participants completed measures of quality of life (QOL) and performance status to examine initial validity.
Results: An 18-item symptom index for advanced bladder cancer included 3 subscales: disease-related symptoms, treatment side effects, and general function/well-being. Lower scores indicate greater symptom burden. Preliminary reliability reveals good internal consistency for the full NFBISI-18 (alpha = 0.83). The NFBISI-18 was significantly associated with QOL criteria and performance status, in the expected direction.
Limitations: Limitations include the cross-sectional design and the relatively low reliability of the disease-related symptoms subscale.
Conclusion: The NFBISI-18 demonstrates preliminary evidence as a valid brief measure of the most important symptoms of advanced bladder cancer, as rated by both patients and oncology clinical experts. The NFBISI-18 should have greater acceptability to regulatory authorities than previously developed questionnaires.