培训NIH K奖获得者:导师的角色。

Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2012-10-01 Epub Date: 2012-08-07 DOI:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00436.x
Elizabeth Ripley, Monika Markowitz, Ann Nichols-Casebolt, Larry Williams, Francis Macrina
{"title":"培训NIH K奖获得者:导师的角色。","authors":"Elizabeth Ripley,&nbsp;Monika Markowitz,&nbsp;Ann Nichols-Casebolt,&nbsp;Larry Williams,&nbsp;Francis Macrina","doi":"10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00436.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Mentors play important roles in training new investigators. This study was designed to determine characteristics of NIH mentored K award recipients and their mentors, their interpersonal interactions, and the factors, which influence satisfaction within this relationship.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey of 3027 NIH mentored K recipients and 1384 mentors was conducted in 2009. Nine hundred twenty-nine (30.7%) of the K recipients and 448 (32.4%) mentors completed the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gender of K respondents was evenly divided while the mentors were 72.1% male. The overall rating of their mentors was positive. Ideally, both thought the mentor should be important in research training; however, in actual practice, both rated the importance as lower. A total of 88.2% of recipients were satisfied with their relationship. Although the number of black K recipients was low, this group was more likely to be dissatisfied with the mentor relationship (6/29 or 20.7%) than their white counterparts. The frequency of meeting or communicating was correlated with K recipient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall K recipients are satisfied with their mentor relationships. Although the number of black K recipient respondents was small, the higher level of mentor dissatisfaction should be further evaluated. Qualities of mentors, including the frequency of interactions and accessibility, can influence satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":501617,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Science","volume":" ","pages":"386-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00436.x","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training NIH K award recipients: the role of the mentor.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Ripley,&nbsp;Monika Markowitz,&nbsp;Ann Nichols-Casebolt,&nbsp;Larry Williams,&nbsp;Francis Macrina\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00436.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Mentors play important roles in training new investigators. This study was designed to determine characteristics of NIH mentored K award recipients and their mentors, their interpersonal interactions, and the factors, which influence satisfaction within this relationship.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey of 3027 NIH mentored K recipients and 1384 mentors was conducted in 2009. Nine hundred twenty-nine (30.7%) of the K recipients and 448 (32.4%) mentors completed the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gender of K respondents was evenly divided while the mentors were 72.1% male. The overall rating of their mentors was positive. Ideally, both thought the mentor should be important in research training; however, in actual practice, both rated the importance as lower. A total of 88.2% of recipients were satisfied with their relationship. Although the number of black K recipients was low, this group was more likely to be dissatisfied with the mentor relationship (6/29 or 20.7%) than their white counterparts. The frequency of meeting or communicating was correlated with K recipient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall K recipients are satisfied with their mentor relationships. Although the number of black K recipient respondents was small, the higher level of mentor dissatisfaction should be further evaluated. Qualities of mentors, including the frequency of interactions and accessibility, can influence satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"386-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00436.x\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00436.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00436.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

未标记:导师在培训新调查员方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在探讨美国国立卫生研究院指导的K奖获得者及其导师的特征、人际互动以及影响这种关系满意度的因素。方法:2009年对3027名NIH指导K获得者和1384名导师进行调查。929名(30.7%)受助人和448名(32.4%)导师完成了调查。结果:K名被调查者性别分布均匀,导师中男性占72.1%。他们对导师的总体评价是积极的。理想情况下,两人都认为导师应该在研究培训中发挥重要作用;然而,在实际操作中,两者都认为其重要性较低。共有88.2%的接受者对他们的关系感到满意。虽然接受K的黑人人数较少,但与白人相比,这一群体更有可能对导师关系不满意(6/29或20.7%)。会面或沟通的频率与K受体满意度相关。结论:总体而言,K受训者对其导师关系感到满意。虽然接受K的黑人受访者数量较少,但对导师不满的较高水平需要进一步评估。导师的素质,包括互动的频率和可接近性,可以影响满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Training NIH K award recipients: the role of the mentor.

Unlabelled: Mentors play important roles in training new investigators. This study was designed to determine characteristics of NIH mentored K award recipients and their mentors, their interpersonal interactions, and the factors, which influence satisfaction within this relationship.

Method: A survey of 3027 NIH mentored K recipients and 1384 mentors was conducted in 2009. Nine hundred twenty-nine (30.7%) of the K recipients and 448 (32.4%) mentors completed the survey.

Results: The gender of K respondents was evenly divided while the mentors were 72.1% male. The overall rating of their mentors was positive. Ideally, both thought the mentor should be important in research training; however, in actual practice, both rated the importance as lower. A total of 88.2% of recipients were satisfied with their relationship. Although the number of black K recipients was low, this group was more likely to be dissatisfied with the mentor relationship (6/29 or 20.7%) than their white counterparts. The frequency of meeting or communicating was correlated with K recipient satisfaction.

Conclusions: Overall K recipients are satisfied with their mentor relationships. Although the number of black K recipient respondents was small, the higher level of mentor dissatisfaction should be further evaluated. Qualities of mentors, including the frequency of interactions and accessibility, can influence satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信