情绪与月经周期:前瞻性数据研究综述

Sarah Romans MB, MD , Rose Clarkson MD , Gillian Einstein PhD , Michele Petrovic BSc , Donna Stewart MD, DPsych
{"title":"情绪与月经周期:前瞻性数据研究综述","authors":"Sarah Romans MB, MD ,&nbsp;Rose Clarkson MD ,&nbsp;Gillian Einstein PhD ,&nbsp;Michele Petrovic BSc ,&nbsp;Donna Stewart MD, DPsych","doi":"10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The human menstrual cycle (MC) has historically been the focus of myth and misinformation, leading to ideas that constrain women's activities.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We wished to examine one pervasive idea, that the MC is a cause of negative mood, by studying the scientific literature as a whole. We briefly reviewed the history of the idea of premenstrual syndrome<span> and undertook a systematic review of quality studies.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and article bibliographies for published studies using non-help–seeking samples with daily mood data collected prospectively for a minimum of 1 complete MC. We critiqued their methodologies and tabulated the key findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 47 English language studies identified, 18 (38.3%) found no association of mood with any MC phase; 18 found an association of negative mood in the premenstrual phase combined with another MC phase; and only 7 (14.9%) found an association of negative mood and the premenstrual phase. Finally, the remaining 4 studies (8.5%) showed an association between negative mood and a non-premenstrual phase. Considering the only 41 adequately powered studies, the same phase links were reported by 36.6%, 41.5%, and 13.5% of studies, respectively. Their diversity of methods (sampling, instruments, and cycle phase definitions) precluded a meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Taken together, these studies failed to provide clear evidence in support of the existence of a specific premenstrual negative mood syndrome in the general population. This puzzlingly widespread belief needs challenging, as it perpetuates negative concepts linking female reproduction with negative emotionality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55124,"journal":{"name":"Gender Medicine","volume":"9 5","pages":"Pages 361-384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.003","citationCount":"84","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mood and the Menstrual Cycle: A Review of Prospective Data Studies\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Romans MB, MD ,&nbsp;Rose Clarkson MD ,&nbsp;Gillian Einstein PhD ,&nbsp;Michele Petrovic BSc ,&nbsp;Donna Stewart MD, DPsych\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The human menstrual cycle (MC) has historically been the focus of myth and misinformation, leading to ideas that constrain women's activities.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We wished to examine one pervasive idea, that the MC is a cause of negative mood, by studying the scientific literature as a whole. We briefly reviewed the history of the idea of premenstrual syndrome<span> and undertook a systematic review of quality studies.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and article bibliographies for published studies using non-help–seeking samples with daily mood data collected prospectively for a minimum of 1 complete MC. We critiqued their methodologies and tabulated the key findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 47 English language studies identified, 18 (38.3%) found no association of mood with any MC phase; 18 found an association of negative mood in the premenstrual phase combined with another MC phase; and only 7 (14.9%) found an association of negative mood and the premenstrual phase. Finally, the remaining 4 studies (8.5%) showed an association between negative mood and a non-premenstrual phase. Considering the only 41 adequately powered studies, the same phase links were reported by 36.6%, 41.5%, and 13.5% of studies, respectively. Their diversity of methods (sampling, instruments, and cycle phase definitions) precluded a meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Taken together, these studies failed to provide clear evidence in support of the existence of a specific premenstrual negative mood syndrome in the general population. This puzzlingly widespread belief needs challenging, as it perpetuates negative concepts linking female reproduction with negative emotionality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender Medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 361-384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.003\",\"citationCount\":\"84\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550857912001349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550857912001349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

摘要

历史上,人类月经周期(MC)一直是神话和错误信息的焦点,导致限制女性活动的想法。目的:我们希望通过整体研究科学文献来检验一个普遍的观点,即MC是消极情绪的原因。我们简要地回顾了经前综合征的历史,并对质量研究进行了系统的回顾。方法:我们检索PubMed、PsycINFO和文章参考书目,查找已发表的研究,这些研究使用非寻求帮助的样本,前瞻性地收集了至少1个完整MC的日常情绪数据。我们对他们的方法进行了批评,并将主要发现制成表格。结果在47项英语语言研究中,18项(38.3%)没有发现情绪与任何MC阶段的关联;18人发现经前期的负面情绪与另一个MC期相关联;只有7人(14.9%)发现负面情绪与经前期有关。最后,剩下的4项研究(8.5%)显示了负面情绪和非经前期之间的联系。考虑到仅有的41项充分支持的研究,同样的阶段联系分别被36.6%、41.5%和13.5%的研究报道。他们的方法(采样、仪器和周期阶段定义)的多样性妨碍了荟萃分析。综上所述,这些研究未能提供明确的证据来支持在普通人群中存在特定的经前负面情绪综合征。这种令人困惑的普遍信念需要挑战,因为它使将女性生殖与负面情绪联系起来的负面概念永久化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mood and the Menstrual Cycle: A Review of Prospective Data Studies

Background

The human menstrual cycle (MC) has historically been the focus of myth and misinformation, leading to ideas that constrain women's activities.

Objectives

We wished to examine one pervasive idea, that the MC is a cause of negative mood, by studying the scientific literature as a whole. We briefly reviewed the history of the idea of premenstrual syndrome and undertook a systematic review of quality studies.

Methods

We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and article bibliographies for published studies using non-help–seeking samples with daily mood data collected prospectively for a minimum of 1 complete MC. We critiqued their methodologies and tabulated the key findings.

Results

Of 47 English language studies identified, 18 (38.3%) found no association of mood with any MC phase; 18 found an association of negative mood in the premenstrual phase combined with another MC phase; and only 7 (14.9%) found an association of negative mood and the premenstrual phase. Finally, the remaining 4 studies (8.5%) showed an association between negative mood and a non-premenstrual phase. Considering the only 41 adequately powered studies, the same phase links were reported by 36.6%, 41.5%, and 13.5% of studies, respectively. Their diversity of methods (sampling, instruments, and cycle phase definitions) precluded a meta-analysis.

Conclusions

Taken together, these studies failed to provide clear evidence in support of the existence of a specific premenstrual negative mood syndrome in the general population. This puzzlingly widespread belief needs challenging, as it perpetuates negative concepts linking female reproduction with negative emotionality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gender Medicine
Gender Medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信