四岁儿童共同阅读干预的结果:让我们一起阅读试验。

Sharon Goldfeld, Jon Quach, Ruth Nicholls, Sheena Reilly, Obioha C Ukoumunne, Melissa Wake
{"title":"四岁儿童共同阅读干预的结果:让我们一起阅读试验。","authors":"Sharon Goldfeld,&nbsp;Jon Quach,&nbsp;Ruth Nicholls,&nbsp;Sheena Reilly,&nbsp;Obioha C Ukoumunne,&nbsp;Melissa Wake","doi":"10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the emergent literacy and language effects of a low-intensity literacy promotion program (Let's Read) provided via universal well-child services to parents during the first 4 years of their child's life.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Population-based, cluster randomized controlled trial performed between March 1, 2006, and December 10, 2010.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Maternal and child health centers (clusters) in 5 relatively disadvantaged local government areas in Melbourne, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All parents attending their 4-week well-child appointments in participating centers were invited to take part in the study.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The Let's Read program was delivered at 4, 12, 18, and 42 months during universal well-child care visits.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Child emergent literacy skills (intrasyllabic, phonemic, and sound/letter knowledge) and language (core, receptive, and expressive), measured at 4 years of age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 630 parents participated, with 365 children in 32 intervention clusters and 265 children in 33 control clusters; 563 children (89.4%) were retained in the study to 4 years of age. The adjusted mean differences (intervention minus control) for emergent literacy was 0.2 (95% CI, -0.2 to 0.6; P = .29) for intrasyllabic units, 0.05 (95% CI, -0.4 to 0.5; P = .85) for phonemic awareness, and 0.1 (95% CI, -1.5 to 1.6; P = .92) for letter knowledge. For language, the differences were 1.6 (95% CI, -1.1 to 4.3; P = .25) for core, 0.8 (95% CI, -2.0 to 3.7; P = .56) for receptive, and 1.4 (95% CI, -1.4 to 4.2; P = .32) for expressive scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This population-wide primary care literacy promotion and book distribution program provided neither the anticipated benefits to literacy and language nor enhanced uptake of literacy activities at 4 years of age, even when targeted to relatively disadvantaged areas.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN04602902.</p>","PeriodicalId":8310,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine","volume":"166 11","pages":"1045-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1099","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Four-year-old outcomes of a universal infant-toddler shared reading intervention: the let's read trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Goldfeld,&nbsp;Jon Quach,&nbsp;Ruth Nicholls,&nbsp;Sheena Reilly,&nbsp;Obioha C Ukoumunne,&nbsp;Melissa Wake\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the emergent literacy and language effects of a low-intensity literacy promotion program (Let's Read) provided via universal well-child services to parents during the first 4 years of their child's life.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Population-based, cluster randomized controlled trial performed between March 1, 2006, and December 10, 2010.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Maternal and child health centers (clusters) in 5 relatively disadvantaged local government areas in Melbourne, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All parents attending their 4-week well-child appointments in participating centers were invited to take part in the study.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The Let's Read program was delivered at 4, 12, 18, and 42 months during universal well-child care visits.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Child emergent literacy skills (intrasyllabic, phonemic, and sound/letter knowledge) and language (core, receptive, and expressive), measured at 4 years of age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 630 parents participated, with 365 children in 32 intervention clusters and 265 children in 33 control clusters; 563 children (89.4%) were retained in the study to 4 years of age. The adjusted mean differences (intervention minus control) for emergent literacy was 0.2 (95% CI, -0.2 to 0.6; P = .29) for intrasyllabic units, 0.05 (95% CI, -0.4 to 0.5; P = .85) for phonemic awareness, and 0.1 (95% CI, -1.5 to 1.6; P = .92) for letter knowledge. For language, the differences were 1.6 (95% CI, -1.1 to 4.3; P = .25) for core, 0.8 (95% CI, -2.0 to 3.7; P = .56) for receptive, and 1.4 (95% CI, -1.4 to 4.2; P = .32) for expressive scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This population-wide primary care literacy promotion and book distribution program provided neither the anticipated benefits to literacy and language nor enhanced uptake of literacy activities at 4 years of age, even when targeted to relatively disadvantaged areas.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN04602902.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine\",\"volume\":\"166 11\",\"pages\":\"1045-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1099\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

目的:确定低强度扫盲促进计划(Let's Read)在儿童出生后4年内对父母的紧急读写能力和语言效果。设计:在2006年3月1日至2010年12月10日期间进行以人群为基础的集群随机对照试验。环境:澳大利亚墨尔本5个相对贫困的地方政府地区的妇幼保健中心(群)。参与者:所有在参与中心参加为期4周的健康儿童预约的父母都被邀请参加这项研究。干预措施:“让我们一起阅读”计划在4、12、18和42个月大的儿童普遍健康护理访问期间实施。主要结果测量:儿童在4岁时的突发读写技能(隐读、音位和语音/字母知识)和语言(核心、接受和表达)。结果:共有630名家长参与,32个干预组365名儿童,33个对照组265名儿童;563名儿童(89.4%)被保留到4岁。紧急读写能力的调整平均差异(干预减去对照组)为0.2 (95% CI, -0.2至0.6;隐囊内单位P = 0.29), 0.05 (95% CI, -0.4 ~ 0.5;音位意识P = 0.85), 0.1 (95% CI, -1.5至1.6;P = .92)。在语言方面,差异为1.6 (95% CI, -1.1至4.3;P = 0.25), core为0.8 (95% CI, -2.0 ~ 3.7;P = 0.56), 1.4 (95% CI, -1.4至4.2;P = .32)。结论:这项全民初级保健扫盲推广和图书分发计划既没有提供预期的扫盲和语言方面的好处,也没有提高4岁儿童扫盲活动的参与度,即使是针对相对贫困地区也是如此。试验注册:isrctn.org标识符:ISRCTN04602902。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Four-year-old outcomes of a universal infant-toddler shared reading intervention: the let's read trial.

Objective: To determine the emergent literacy and language effects of a low-intensity literacy promotion program (Let's Read) provided via universal well-child services to parents during the first 4 years of their child's life.

Design: Population-based, cluster randomized controlled trial performed between March 1, 2006, and December 10, 2010.

Setting: Maternal and child health centers (clusters) in 5 relatively disadvantaged local government areas in Melbourne, Australia.

Participants: All parents attending their 4-week well-child appointments in participating centers were invited to take part in the study.

Intervention: The Let's Read program was delivered at 4, 12, 18, and 42 months during universal well-child care visits.

Main outcome measure: Child emergent literacy skills (intrasyllabic, phonemic, and sound/letter knowledge) and language (core, receptive, and expressive), measured at 4 years of age.

Results: A total of 630 parents participated, with 365 children in 32 intervention clusters and 265 children in 33 control clusters; 563 children (89.4%) were retained in the study to 4 years of age. The adjusted mean differences (intervention minus control) for emergent literacy was 0.2 (95% CI, -0.2 to 0.6; P = .29) for intrasyllabic units, 0.05 (95% CI, -0.4 to 0.5; P = .85) for phonemic awareness, and 0.1 (95% CI, -1.5 to 1.6; P = .92) for letter knowledge. For language, the differences were 1.6 (95% CI, -1.1 to 4.3; P = .25) for core, 0.8 (95% CI, -2.0 to 3.7; P = .56) for receptive, and 1.4 (95% CI, -1.4 to 4.2; P = .32) for expressive scores.

Conclusion: This population-wide primary care literacy promotion and book distribution program provided neither the anticipated benefits to literacy and language nor enhanced uptake of literacy activities at 4 years of age, even when targeted to relatively disadvantaged areas.

Trial registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN04602902.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信