皮肤病结局测量:对“白癜风结局测量的测量特性”的评论。

Michael Bigby
{"title":"皮肤病结局测量:对“白癜风结局测量的测量特性”的评论。","authors":"Michael Bigby","doi":"10.1001/archdermatol.2012.3088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I n the article by Vrijman et al, “construct” refers to any method used to determine the outcome of a clinical trial of the treatment of patients with vitiligo. Construct validity refers to the experimental demonstration that the construct (ie, method) actually measures what it claims to measure. Criterion validity refers to the experimental demonstration that the method compares with a well-accepted standard (“gold standard”). Structural validity refers to internal consistency of the method. (See: Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.) As noted by the authors, the development of scales and indices for skin diseases and testing their measurement properties has been inadequate. (See: Allen AM. Clinical trials in dermatology, part 3: measuring responses to treatment. Int J Dermatol. 1980;19[1]:1-6; and Bigby M, Gadenne A-S. Understanding and evaluating clinical trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34[4]:555-590.) The Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist represents the application of methods from the social sciences to test the measurement properties of outcome measures in clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":8175,"journal":{"name":"Archives of dermatology","volume":"148 11","pages":"1310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.3088","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome measures in dermatology: comment on \\\"measurement properties of outcome measures for vitiligo\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Michael Bigby\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archdermatol.2012.3088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I n the article by Vrijman et al, “construct” refers to any method used to determine the outcome of a clinical trial of the treatment of patients with vitiligo. Construct validity refers to the experimental demonstration that the construct (ie, method) actually measures what it claims to measure. Criterion validity refers to the experimental demonstration that the method compares with a well-accepted standard (“gold standard”). Structural validity refers to internal consistency of the method. (See: Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.) As noted by the authors, the development of scales and indices for skin diseases and testing their measurement properties has been inadequate. (See: Allen AM. Clinical trials in dermatology, part 3: measuring responses to treatment. Int J Dermatol. 1980;19[1]:1-6; and Bigby M, Gadenne A-S. Understanding and evaluating clinical trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34[4]:555-590.) The Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist represents the application of methods from the social sciences to test the measurement properties of outcome measures in clinical trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of dermatology\",\"volume\":\"148 11\",\"pages\":\"1310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.3088\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.3088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.3088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome measures in dermatology: comment on "measurement properties of outcome measures for vitiligo".
I n the article by Vrijman et al, “construct” refers to any method used to determine the outcome of a clinical trial of the treatment of patients with vitiligo. Construct validity refers to the experimental demonstration that the construct (ie, method) actually measures what it claims to measure. Criterion validity refers to the experimental demonstration that the method compares with a well-accepted standard (“gold standard”). Structural validity refers to internal consistency of the method. (See: Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.) As noted by the authors, the development of scales and indices for skin diseases and testing their measurement properties has been inadequate. (See: Allen AM. Clinical trials in dermatology, part 3: measuring responses to treatment. Int J Dermatol. 1980;19[1]:1-6; and Bigby M, Gadenne A-S. Understanding and evaluating clinical trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34[4]:555-590.) The Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist represents the application of methods from the social sciences to test the measurement properties of outcome measures in clinical trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of dermatology
Archives of dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信