CAHPS 2.0在非裔美国人和白人医疗保险调查对象中的可读性和数据缺失率

Marie Ngetiko Fongwa RN, MPH, PhD , Claude M. Setodji PhD , Sylvia H. Paz PhD , Leo S. Morales MD, PhD , W.N. Steers PhD , Ron D. Hays PhD
{"title":"CAHPS 2.0在非裔美国人和白人医疗保险调查对象中的可读性和数据缺失率","authors":"Marie Ngetiko Fongwa RN, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Claude M. Setodji PhD ,&nbsp;Sylvia H. Paz PhD ,&nbsp;Leo S. Morales MD, PhD ,&nbsp;W.N. Steers PhD ,&nbsp;Ron D. Hays PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ehrm.2010.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To examine associations between readability of survey items and missing data rates in a sample of white and African-American Medicare enrollees in managed care plans.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems (CAHPS) 2.0 health plan survey data collected from 139,284 respondents (127,524 whites and 11,760 African Americans) in 321 health plans. Product-moment correlations were computed between Flesch-Kincaid (F-K) readability estimates and the CAHPS item-missing data rates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>F-K reading levels for items ranged from 4.8 to 17.7 with a mean of 8.9 across items. Missing data rates ranged from 1% to 10%, with African Americans having significantly higher missing data rates. Correlations between missing data rates and item-level readability were statistically significant for whites (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.33, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.0515) and African Americans (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.37, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.0284).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The significant associations between missing data rates and item-level readability estimates indicate that the completion of survey items varies by their readability. Enhancing the readability of survey items can improve the inclusion of survey data collected from different respondents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88882,"journal":{"name":"Health outcomes research in medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages e39-e49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2010.03.001","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readability and Missing Data Rates in CAHPS 2.0 Medicare Survey in African American and White Medicare Respondents\",\"authors\":\"Marie Ngetiko Fongwa RN, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Claude M. Setodji PhD ,&nbsp;Sylvia H. Paz PhD ,&nbsp;Leo S. Morales MD, PhD ,&nbsp;W.N. Steers PhD ,&nbsp;Ron D. Hays PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ehrm.2010.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To examine associations between readability of survey items and missing data rates in a sample of white and African-American Medicare enrollees in managed care plans.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems (CAHPS) 2.0 health plan survey data collected from 139,284 respondents (127,524 whites and 11,760 African Americans) in 321 health plans. Product-moment correlations were computed between Flesch-Kincaid (F-K) readability estimates and the CAHPS item-missing data rates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>F-K reading levels for items ranged from 4.8 to 17.7 with a mean of 8.9 across items. Missing data rates ranged from 1% to 10%, with African Americans having significantly higher missing data rates. Correlations between missing data rates and item-level readability were statistically significant for whites (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.33, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.0515) and African Americans (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.37, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.0284).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The significant associations between missing data rates and item-level readability estimates indicate that the completion of survey items varies by their readability. Enhancing the readability of survey items can improve the inclusion of survey data collected from different respondents.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health outcomes research in medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages e39-e49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2010.03.001\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health outcomes research in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131910000030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health outcomes research in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131910000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的研究管理式医疗计划中白人和非裔美国医疗保险参保人样本中调查项目的可读性与数据缺失率之间的关系。方法采用消费者医疗服务提供者和系统评估(CAHPS) 2.0健康计划调查数据,收集321个健康计划的139284名受访者(127524名白人和11760名非裔美国人)。计算Flesch-Kincaid (F-K)可读性估计与CAHPS项目缺失数据率之间的积矩相关性。结果f - k阅读水平在4.8 - 17.7之间,平均8.9。数据丢失率从1%到10%不等,非裔美国人的数据丢失率要高得多。在白人(r = 0.33, P = .0515)和非裔美国人(r = 0.37, P = .0284)中,缺失数据率与项目水平可读性之间的相关性具有统计学意义。结论数据缺失率与项目可读性之间的显著关联表明,调查项目的完成程度因其可读性而异。提高调查项目的可读性可以提高从不同受访者收集的调查数据的包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Readability and Missing Data Rates in CAHPS 2.0 Medicare Survey in African American and White Medicare Respondents

Purpose

To examine associations between readability of survey items and missing data rates in a sample of white and African-American Medicare enrollees in managed care plans.

Methods

Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems (CAHPS) 2.0 health plan survey data collected from 139,284 respondents (127,524 whites and 11,760 African Americans) in 321 health plans. Product-moment correlations were computed between Flesch-Kincaid (F-K) readability estimates and the CAHPS item-missing data rates.

Results

F-K reading levels for items ranged from 4.8 to 17.7 with a mean of 8.9 across items. Missing data rates ranged from 1% to 10%, with African Americans having significantly higher missing data rates. Correlations between missing data rates and item-level readability were statistically significant for whites (r = 0.33, P = .0515) and African Americans (r = 0.37, P = .0284).

Conclusions

The significant associations between missing data rates and item-level readability estimates indicate that the completion of survey items varies by their readability. Enhancing the readability of survey items can improve the inclusion of survey data collected from different respondents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信