视神经脊髓炎与严重和难治性疼痛的关系。

Peiqing Qian, Samantha Lancia, Enrique Alvarez, Eric C Klawiter, Anne H Cross, Robert T Naismith
{"title":"视神经脊髓炎与严重和难治性疼痛的关系。","authors":"Peiqing Qian,&nbsp;Samantha Lancia,&nbsp;Enrique Alvarez,&nbsp;Eric C Klawiter,&nbsp;Anne H Cross,&nbsp;Robert T Naismith","doi":"10.1001/archneurol.2012.768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To contrast differences in pain and treatment outcomes between neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic MS center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Complete ascertainment of an academic MS center cohort of NMO and an MS comparison sample cohort.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Current pain was quantified by a 10-point scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire.Expanded Disability Status Scale score and number of involved spinal cord levels were collected in addition to testing for cognition, fatigue, depression, and quality of life. Number and types of pain medications were tabulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Current pain was more common in subjects with NMO (n=29) vs MS (n=66) (86.2% vs 40.9%; P.001)and more severe on a 10-point scale (5.38 vs 1.85;P.001). Pain remained more common after controlling for disability and number of spinal cord segments(P=.03). Prescription pain medication was used more frequently in subjects with NMO compared with subjects with MS(75.9% vs 37.8%; P.001), often requiring more than 1 medication (65.5% vs 15.2%; P.001). No subject with NMO taking pain medication (22 of 29) rated their current pain as 0 of 10, whereas almost half of those taking pain medication with MS were currently free of pain (0% vs 48%; P=.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neuromyelitis optica is frequently associated with severe pain that appears insufficiently controlled by pharmacologic interventions. Future studies should evaluate the efficacy of a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach to pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8321,"journal":{"name":"Archives of neurology","volume":"69 11","pages":"1482-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archneurol.2012.768","citationCount":"84","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of neuromyelitis optica with severe and intractable pain.\",\"authors\":\"Peiqing Qian,&nbsp;Samantha Lancia,&nbsp;Enrique Alvarez,&nbsp;Eric C Klawiter,&nbsp;Anne H Cross,&nbsp;Robert T Naismith\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archneurol.2012.768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To contrast differences in pain and treatment outcomes between neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic MS center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Complete ascertainment of an academic MS center cohort of NMO and an MS comparison sample cohort.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Current pain was quantified by a 10-point scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire.Expanded Disability Status Scale score and number of involved spinal cord levels were collected in addition to testing for cognition, fatigue, depression, and quality of life. Number and types of pain medications were tabulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Current pain was more common in subjects with NMO (n=29) vs MS (n=66) (86.2% vs 40.9%; P.001)and more severe on a 10-point scale (5.38 vs 1.85;P.001). Pain remained more common after controlling for disability and number of spinal cord segments(P=.03). Prescription pain medication was used more frequently in subjects with NMO compared with subjects with MS(75.9% vs 37.8%; P.001), often requiring more than 1 medication (65.5% vs 15.2%; P.001). No subject with NMO taking pain medication (22 of 29) rated their current pain as 0 of 10, whereas almost half of those taking pain medication with MS were currently free of pain (0% vs 48%; P=.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neuromyelitis optica is frequently associated with severe pain that appears insufficiently controlled by pharmacologic interventions. Future studies should evaluate the efficacy of a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach to pain management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of neurology\",\"volume\":\"69 11\",\"pages\":\"1482-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archneurol.2012.768\",\"citationCount\":\"84\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2012.768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2012.768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

摘要

目的:比较视神经脊髓炎(NMO)和多发性硬化症(MS)在疼痛和治疗效果方面的差异。设计:回顾性横断面队列研究。设置:学术MS中心。患者:完全确定一个学术多发性硬化症中心队列和一个多发性硬化症比较样本队列。主要结果测量:当前疼痛通过10分制和麦吉尔疼痛问卷进行量化。除了对认知、疲劳、抑郁和生活质量进行测试外,还收集了扩展残疾状态量表评分和涉及脊髓水平的数量。将止痛药的数量和种类制成表格。结果:NMO患者(n=29)比MS患者(n=66)当前疼痛更常见(86.2% vs 40.9%;P.001)和更严重的10分制(5.38 vs 1.85;P.001)。在控制残疾和脊髓节段数后,疼痛仍然更常见(P=.03)。NMO患者使用处方止痛药的频率高于MS患者(75.9% vs 37.8%;P.001),通常需要1种以上的药物(65.5% vs 15.2%;P.001)。没有患有多发性硬化症的受试者服用止痛药(29人中有22人)将他们目前的疼痛评分为0分(满分为10分),而几乎一半的患有多发性硬化症的患者服用止痛药目前没有疼痛(0%对48%;P = .006)。结论:视神经脊髓炎常伴有严重的疼痛,药物干预不足以控制疼痛。未来的研究应评估多学科和多模式的疼痛管理方法的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of neuromyelitis optica with severe and intractable pain.

Objective: To contrast differences in pain and treatment outcomes between neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and multiple sclerosis (MS).

Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study.

Setting: Academic MS center.

Patients: Complete ascertainment of an academic MS center cohort of NMO and an MS comparison sample cohort.

Main outcome measures: Current pain was quantified by a 10-point scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire.Expanded Disability Status Scale score and number of involved spinal cord levels were collected in addition to testing for cognition, fatigue, depression, and quality of life. Number and types of pain medications were tabulated.

Results: Current pain was more common in subjects with NMO (n=29) vs MS (n=66) (86.2% vs 40.9%; P.001)and more severe on a 10-point scale (5.38 vs 1.85;P.001). Pain remained more common after controlling for disability and number of spinal cord segments(P=.03). Prescription pain medication was used more frequently in subjects with NMO compared with subjects with MS(75.9% vs 37.8%; P.001), often requiring more than 1 medication (65.5% vs 15.2%; P.001). No subject with NMO taking pain medication (22 of 29) rated their current pain as 0 of 10, whereas almost half of those taking pain medication with MS were currently free of pain (0% vs 48%; P=.006).

Conclusions: Neuromyelitis optica is frequently associated with severe pain that appears insufficiently controlled by pharmacologic interventions. Future studies should evaluate the efficacy of a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach to pain management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of neurology
Archives of neurology 医学-临床神经学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信