基于计算机断层扫描的导航辅助椎弓根螺钉置入治疗胸腰椎骨折。

Chih-Yun Fan Chiang, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Lih-Huei Chen, Po-Liang Lai, Tsai-Sheng Fu, Chi-Chien Niu, Wen-Jer Chen
{"title":"基于计算机断层扫描的导航辅助椎弓根螺钉置入治疗胸腰椎骨折。","authors":"Chih-Yun Fan Chiang, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Lih-Huei Chen, Po-Liang Lai, Tsai-Sheng Fu, Chi-Chien Niu, Wen-Jer Chen","doi":"10.4103/2319-4170.106137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nIncorrect placement of pedicle screws may lead to neurovascular injury, so the position is important for the reduction of spinal fractures. CT-based image-guided surgery has been promoted as a means to theoretically improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Patients who underwent CT-based navigation-assisted pedicle screw fixation for thoracic or lumbar fractures were reviewed to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement for spinal fracture cases.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA computed tomographic (CT)-based image-guided system (BrainLAB) was used for pedicle screw insertion in 14 patients with thoracic or lumbar spine fractures. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was analyzed by the preoperative and postoperative Cobb's angle and sagittal screw angle with a review of radiographic images, and the penetration of the pedicle cortex by postoperative CT scans.\n\n\nRESULTS\nUnder the guidance of CT-based navigation 102 screws were inserted. Cobb's angle was corrected to an average of 15 degrees in the 14 patients. The sagittal screw angle was less than 10 degrees for 92 (90.2 %) screws, and the overall average was 5 degrees. The results of the postoperative CT review showed only 3 (2.9 %) screws penetrated the pedicle cortex laterally and no screw penetrated medially. No iagtrogenic neurological injury was found.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe accuracy of pedicle screw placement is crucial for thoracolumbar spine fracture fixation. The placement of pedicle screws can be done accurately with the aid of a CT-based image-guided system. Furthermore, this opens the possibility for surgeons to reduce radiation exposure by eliminating the need for intraoperative fluoroscopy.","PeriodicalId":10018,"journal":{"name":"Chang Gung medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computed tomography-based navigation-assisted pedicle screw insertion for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Yun Fan Chiang, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Lih-Huei Chen, Po-Liang Lai, Tsai-Sheng Fu, Chi-Chien Niu, Wen-Jer Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2319-4170.106137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nIncorrect placement of pedicle screws may lead to neurovascular injury, so the position is important for the reduction of spinal fractures. CT-based image-guided surgery has been promoted as a means to theoretically improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Patients who underwent CT-based navigation-assisted pedicle screw fixation for thoracic or lumbar fractures were reviewed to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement for spinal fracture cases.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA computed tomographic (CT)-based image-guided system (BrainLAB) was used for pedicle screw insertion in 14 patients with thoracic or lumbar spine fractures. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was analyzed by the preoperative and postoperative Cobb's angle and sagittal screw angle with a review of radiographic images, and the penetration of the pedicle cortex by postoperative CT scans.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nUnder the guidance of CT-based navigation 102 screws were inserted. Cobb's angle was corrected to an average of 15 degrees in the 14 patients. The sagittal screw angle was less than 10 degrees for 92 (90.2 %) screws, and the overall average was 5 degrees. The results of the postoperative CT review showed only 3 (2.9 %) screws penetrated the pedicle cortex laterally and no screw penetrated medially. No iagtrogenic neurological injury was found.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThe accuracy of pedicle screw placement is crucial for thoracolumbar spine fracture fixation. The placement of pedicle screws can be done accurately with the aid of a CT-based image-guided system. Furthermore, this opens the possibility for surgeons to reduce radiation exposure by eliminating the need for intraoperative fluoroscopy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chang Gung medical journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chang Gung medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-4170.106137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chang Gung medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-4170.106137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

背景:椎弓根螺钉放置不正确可能导致神经血管损伤,因此椎弓根螺钉的位置对脊柱骨折复位很重要。基于ct的图像引导手术作为一种理论上提高椎弓根螺钉置入精度的手段已得到推广。我们回顾了采用ct导航辅助椎弓根螺钉固定胸椎或腰椎骨折的患者,以评估椎弓根螺钉放置在脊柱骨折病例中的准确性。方法:采用基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的图像引导系统(BrainLAB)对14例胸腰椎骨折患者进行椎弓根螺钉置入。通过术前和术后Cobb角和矢状位螺钉角度,结合x线片图像,以及术后CT扫描椎弓根皮质的穿透情况,分析椎弓根螺钉放置的准确性。结果:在ct导航引导下,共置入螺钉102枚。在14名患者中,Cobb角被矫正到平均15度。92颗(90.2%)螺钉矢状位角度小于10度,总体平均值为5度。术后CT检查结果显示,只有3颗螺钉(2.9%)向外侧插入椎弓根皮质,没有螺钉向内侧插入。未发现内源性神经损伤。结论:椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性是胸腰椎骨折固定的关键。在基于ct的图像引导系统的帮助下,可以准确地放置椎弓根螺钉。此外,通过消除术中透视检查的需要,这为外科医生减少辐射暴露开辟了可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computed tomography-based navigation-assisted pedicle screw insertion for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures.
BACKGROUND Incorrect placement of pedicle screws may lead to neurovascular injury, so the position is important for the reduction of spinal fractures. CT-based image-guided surgery has been promoted as a means to theoretically improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Patients who underwent CT-based navigation-assisted pedicle screw fixation for thoracic or lumbar fractures were reviewed to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement for spinal fracture cases. METHODS A computed tomographic (CT)-based image-guided system (BrainLAB) was used for pedicle screw insertion in 14 patients with thoracic or lumbar spine fractures. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was analyzed by the preoperative and postoperative Cobb's angle and sagittal screw angle with a review of radiographic images, and the penetration of the pedicle cortex by postoperative CT scans. RESULTS Under the guidance of CT-based navigation 102 screws were inserted. Cobb's angle was corrected to an average of 15 degrees in the 14 patients. The sagittal screw angle was less than 10 degrees for 92 (90.2 %) screws, and the overall average was 5 degrees. The results of the postoperative CT review showed only 3 (2.9 %) screws penetrated the pedicle cortex laterally and no screw penetrated medially. No iagtrogenic neurological injury was found. CONCLUSION The accuracy of pedicle screw placement is crucial for thoracolumbar spine fracture fixation. The placement of pedicle screws can be done accurately with the aid of a CT-based image-guided system. Furthermore, this opens the possibility for surgeons to reduce radiation exposure by eliminating the need for intraoperative fluoroscopy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信