鸟类、灵长类动物和口语起源:行为表型和神经生物学基础。

Frontiers in evolutionary neuroscience Pub Date : 2012-08-16 eCollection Date: 2012-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnevo.2012.00012
Christopher I Petkov, Erich D Jarvis
{"title":"鸟类、灵长类动物和口语起源:行为表型和神经生物学基础。","authors":"Christopher I Petkov, Erich D Jarvis","doi":"10.3389/fnevo.2012.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vocal learners such as humans and songbirds can learn to produce elaborate patterns of structurally organized vocalizations, whereas many other vertebrates such as non-human primates and most other bird groups either cannot or do so to a very limited degree. To explain the similarities among humans and vocal-learning birds and the differences with other species, various theories have been proposed. One set of theories are motor theories, which underscore the role of the motor system as an evolutionary substrate for vocal production learning. For instance, the motor theory of speech and song perception proposes enhanced auditory perceptual learning of speech in humans and song in birds, which suggests a considerable level of neurobiological specialization. Another, a motor theory of vocal learning origin, proposes that the brain pathways that control the learning and production of song and speech were derived from adjacent motor brain pathways. Another set of theories are cognitive theories, which address the interface between cognition and the auditory-vocal domains to support language learning in humans. Here we critically review the behavioral and neurobiological evidence for parallels and differences between the so-called vocal learners and vocal non-learners in the context of motor and cognitive theories. In doing so, we note that behaviorally vocal-production learning abilities are more distributed than categorical, as are the auditory-learning abilities of animals. We propose testable hypotheses on the extent of the specializations and cross-species correspondences suggested by motor and cognitive theories. We believe that determining how spoken language evolved is likely to become clearer with concerted efforts in testing comparative data from many non-human animal species.</p>","PeriodicalId":88241,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in evolutionary neuroscience","volume":"4 ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3419981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Birds, primates, and spoken language origins: behavioral phenotypes and neurobiological substrates.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher I Petkov, Erich D Jarvis\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnevo.2012.00012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Vocal learners such as humans and songbirds can learn to produce elaborate patterns of structurally organized vocalizations, whereas many other vertebrates such as non-human primates and most other bird groups either cannot or do so to a very limited degree. To explain the similarities among humans and vocal-learning birds and the differences with other species, various theories have been proposed. One set of theories are motor theories, which underscore the role of the motor system as an evolutionary substrate for vocal production learning. For instance, the motor theory of speech and song perception proposes enhanced auditory perceptual learning of speech in humans and song in birds, which suggests a considerable level of neurobiological specialization. Another, a motor theory of vocal learning origin, proposes that the brain pathways that control the learning and production of song and speech were derived from adjacent motor brain pathways. Another set of theories are cognitive theories, which address the interface between cognition and the auditory-vocal domains to support language learning in humans. Here we critically review the behavioral and neurobiological evidence for parallels and differences between the so-called vocal learners and vocal non-learners in the context of motor and cognitive theories. In doing so, we note that behaviorally vocal-production learning abilities are more distributed than categorical, as are the auditory-learning abilities of animals. We propose testable hypotheses on the extent of the specializations and cross-species correspondences suggested by motor and cognitive theories. We believe that determining how spoken language evolved is likely to become clearer with concerted efforts in testing comparative data from many non-human animal species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in evolutionary neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3419981/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in evolutionary neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2012.00012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in evolutionary neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2012.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类和鸣禽等发声学习者可以学会发出结构严谨的发声模式,而许多其他脊椎动物,如非人类灵长类动物和大多数其他鸟类,要么不能学会发声,要么学会的程度非常有限。为了解释人类与学习发声的鸟类之间的相似之处以及与其他物种的不同之处,人们提出了各种理论。其中一套理论是运动理论,强调运动系统是发声学习的进化基础。例如,语言和歌曲感知的运动理论提出,人类对语言的听觉感知学习和鸟类对歌曲的听觉感知学习都得到了增强,这表明神经生物学的专业化程度相当高。另一种是声乐学习起源的运动理论,提出控制歌曲和语音学习与产生的大脑通路来自相邻的运动大脑通路。另一组理论是认知理论,该理论探讨了认知与听觉-发声领域之间的界面,以支持人类的语言学习。在此,我们从行为学和神经生物学的角度,以运动理论和认知理论为背景,对所谓的发声学习者和非发声学习者之间的相似之处和不同之处进行了批判性评述。在此过程中,我们注意到,从行为学角度看,发声学习能力更多是分布式的,而不是分类的,动物的听觉学习能力也是如此。我们就运动和认知理论提出的特化程度和跨物种对应关系提出了可检验的假设。我们相信,通过共同努力测试来自许多非人类动物物种的比较数据,口语如何进化的问题可能会变得更加清晰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Birds, primates, and spoken language origins: behavioral phenotypes and neurobiological substrates.

Birds, primates, and spoken language origins: behavioral phenotypes and neurobiological substrates.

Birds, primates, and spoken language origins: behavioral phenotypes and neurobiological substrates.

Birds, primates, and spoken language origins: behavioral phenotypes and neurobiological substrates.

Vocal learners such as humans and songbirds can learn to produce elaborate patterns of structurally organized vocalizations, whereas many other vertebrates such as non-human primates and most other bird groups either cannot or do so to a very limited degree. To explain the similarities among humans and vocal-learning birds and the differences with other species, various theories have been proposed. One set of theories are motor theories, which underscore the role of the motor system as an evolutionary substrate for vocal production learning. For instance, the motor theory of speech and song perception proposes enhanced auditory perceptual learning of speech in humans and song in birds, which suggests a considerable level of neurobiological specialization. Another, a motor theory of vocal learning origin, proposes that the brain pathways that control the learning and production of song and speech were derived from adjacent motor brain pathways. Another set of theories are cognitive theories, which address the interface between cognition and the auditory-vocal domains to support language learning in humans. Here we critically review the behavioral and neurobiological evidence for parallels and differences between the so-called vocal learners and vocal non-learners in the context of motor and cognitive theories. In doing so, we note that behaviorally vocal-production learning abilities are more distributed than categorical, as are the auditory-learning abilities of animals. We propose testable hypotheses on the extent of the specializations and cross-species correspondences suggested by motor and cognitive theories. We believe that determining how spoken language evolved is likely to become clearer with concerted efforts in testing comparative data from many non-human animal species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信