直接接触试验评价4种牙髓封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性:体外研究。

ISRN dentistry Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-07-19 DOI:10.5402/2012/989781
Lavanya Anumula, Swaroop Kumar, Venkata Suneel Kumar, Chandra Sekhar, Murali Krishna, Rama Mohan Pathapati, Prathi Venkata Sarath, Yamini Vadaganadam, Rakesh Kumar Manne, Srinath Mudlapudi
{"title":"直接接触试验评价4种牙髓封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性:体外研究。","authors":"Lavanya Anumula,&nbsp;Swaroop Kumar,&nbsp;Venkata Suneel Kumar,&nbsp;Chandra Sekhar,&nbsp;Murali Krishna,&nbsp;Rama Mohan Pathapati,&nbsp;Prathi Venkata Sarath,&nbsp;Yamini Vadaganadam,&nbsp;Rakesh Kumar Manne,&nbsp;Srinath Mudlapudi","doi":"10.5402/2012/989781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim. To evaluate the antibacterial activity of four endodontic sealers on Enterococcus faecalis by a direct contact test. Material and Methods. Enterococcus faecalis was used as a test organism. Direct contact test which is based on measuring the effect of close contact between test bacteria and tested material on the kinetics of bacterial growth was performed to overcome the disadvantages of agar diffusion test. The sealers tested were zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer, glass-ionomer-based sealer, polydimethyl-siloxane-based sealer, and urethane dimethacrylate resin-based sealer. Data was collected by recording the optical density with the help of a spectrophotometer. Results. The sealers exhibited different inhibitory effects. The results obtained were subjected to statistical analysis by Kruskal Wallis analysis of variance and Dunn's multiple comparison test. Group comparison showed very highly significant difference between the groups. Conclusion. Zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer was the most effective and urethane dimethacrylate resin-based sealer was the least effective against Enterococcus faecalis, whereas glass-ionomer-based and polydimethyl-siloxane-based sealers were effective only for a short period. Inhibition of the bacterial growth is related to the direct contact of the microorganism with the sealer.</p>","PeriodicalId":89396,"journal":{"name":"ISRN dentistry","volume":"2012 ","pages":"989781"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3408652/pdf/","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment of Antibacterial Activity of Four Endodontic Sealers on Enterococcus faecalis by a Direct Contact Test: An In Vitro Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lavanya Anumula,&nbsp;Swaroop Kumar,&nbsp;Venkata Suneel Kumar,&nbsp;Chandra Sekhar,&nbsp;Murali Krishna,&nbsp;Rama Mohan Pathapati,&nbsp;Prathi Venkata Sarath,&nbsp;Yamini Vadaganadam,&nbsp;Rakesh Kumar Manne,&nbsp;Srinath Mudlapudi\",\"doi\":\"10.5402/2012/989781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aim. To evaluate the antibacterial activity of four endodontic sealers on Enterococcus faecalis by a direct contact test. Material and Methods. Enterococcus faecalis was used as a test organism. Direct contact test which is based on measuring the effect of close contact between test bacteria and tested material on the kinetics of bacterial growth was performed to overcome the disadvantages of agar diffusion test. The sealers tested were zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer, glass-ionomer-based sealer, polydimethyl-siloxane-based sealer, and urethane dimethacrylate resin-based sealer. Data was collected by recording the optical density with the help of a spectrophotometer. Results. The sealers exhibited different inhibitory effects. The results obtained were subjected to statistical analysis by Kruskal Wallis analysis of variance and Dunn's multiple comparison test. Group comparison showed very highly significant difference between the groups. Conclusion. Zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer was the most effective and urethane dimethacrylate resin-based sealer was the least effective against Enterococcus faecalis, whereas glass-ionomer-based and polydimethyl-siloxane-based sealers were effective only for a short period. Inhibition of the bacterial growth is related to the direct contact of the microorganism with the sealer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2012 \",\"pages\":\"989781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3408652/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/989781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/989781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

的目标。采用直接接触法评价4种牙髓封口剂对粪肠球菌的抑菌活性。材料和方法。以粪肠球菌为试验菌。为克服琼脂扩散法的缺点,采用直接接触法测量被试细菌与被试材料的密切接触对细菌生长动力学的影响。测试的密封剂有氧化锌丁香酚基密封剂、玻璃离子基密封剂、聚二甲基硅氧烷基密封剂和聚氨酯二甲基丙烯酸酯树脂基密封剂。利用分光光度计记录光密度来收集数据。结果。封口剂表现出不同的抑制作用。所得结果采用Kruskal Wallis方差分析和Dunn多重比较检验进行统计分析。组间比较显示组间差异极显著。结论。氧化锌丁香酚类封口剂对粪肠球菌的效果最好,聚氨酯二甲基丙烯酸酯树脂类封口剂效果最差,而玻璃离子聚体和聚二甲基硅氧烷类封口剂仅在短时间内有效。细菌生长的抑制与微生物与封口机的直接接触有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An Assessment of Antibacterial Activity of Four Endodontic Sealers on Enterococcus faecalis by a Direct Contact Test: An In Vitro Study.

An Assessment of Antibacterial Activity of Four Endodontic Sealers on Enterococcus faecalis by a Direct Contact Test: An In Vitro Study.

An Assessment of Antibacterial Activity of Four Endodontic Sealers on Enterococcus faecalis by a Direct Contact Test: An In Vitro Study.

An Assessment of Antibacterial Activity of Four Endodontic Sealers on Enterococcus faecalis by a Direct Contact Test: An In Vitro Study.

Aim. To evaluate the antibacterial activity of four endodontic sealers on Enterococcus faecalis by a direct contact test. Material and Methods. Enterococcus faecalis was used as a test organism. Direct contact test which is based on measuring the effect of close contact between test bacteria and tested material on the kinetics of bacterial growth was performed to overcome the disadvantages of agar diffusion test. The sealers tested were zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer, glass-ionomer-based sealer, polydimethyl-siloxane-based sealer, and urethane dimethacrylate resin-based sealer. Data was collected by recording the optical density with the help of a spectrophotometer. Results. The sealers exhibited different inhibitory effects. The results obtained were subjected to statistical analysis by Kruskal Wallis analysis of variance and Dunn's multiple comparison test. Group comparison showed very highly significant difference between the groups. Conclusion. Zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer was the most effective and urethane dimethacrylate resin-based sealer was the least effective against Enterococcus faecalis, whereas glass-ionomer-based and polydimethyl-siloxane-based sealers were effective only for a short period. Inhibition of the bacterial growth is related to the direct contact of the microorganism with the sealer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信