桃金娘(Myrtus communis)、万寿菊(Calendula officinalis)精油与避蚊胺对人体按蚊的驱避效果比较

Iranian Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-12-31
M Tavassoli, M Shayeghi, Mr Abai, H Vatandoost, M Khoobdel, M Salari, A Ghaderi, F Rafi
{"title":"桃金娘(Myrtus communis)、万寿菊(Calendula officinalis)精油与避蚊胺对人体按蚊的驱避效果比较","authors":"M Tavassoli,&nbsp;M Shayeghi,&nbsp;Mr Abai,&nbsp;H Vatandoost,&nbsp;M Khoobdel,&nbsp;M Salari,&nbsp;A Ghaderi,&nbsp;F Rafi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria and leishmaniasis are two most significant parasitic diseases which are endemic in Iran. Over the past decades, interest in botanical repellents has increased as a result of safety to human. The comparative efficacy of essential oils of two native plants, myrtle (Myrtus communis) and marigold (Calendula officinalis) collected from natural habitats at southern Iran was compared with DEET as synthetic repellent against Anopheles stephensi on human subjects under laboratory condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Essential oils from two species of native plants were obtained by Clevenger-type water distillation. The protection time of DEET, marigold and myrtle was assessed on human subject using screened cage method against An. stephensi. The effective dose of 50% essential oils of two latter species and DEET were determined by modified ASTM method. ED(50) and ED(90) values and related statistical parameters were calculated by probit analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The protection time of 50% essential oils of marigold and myrtle were respectively 2.15 and 4.36 hours compared to 6.23 hours for DEET 25%. The median effective dose (ED(50)) of 50% essential oils was 0.1105 and 0.6034 mg/cm(2) respectively in myrtle and marigold. The figure for DEET was 0.0023 mg/cm(2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study exhibited that the repellency of both botanical repellents was generally lower than DEET as a synthetic repellent. However the 50% essential oil of myrtle showed a moderate repellency effects compared to marigold against An. stephensi.</p>","PeriodicalId":14525,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases","volume":"5 2","pages":"10-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/26/bc/ijad-5-10.PMC3385578.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repellency Effects of Essential Oils of Myrtle (Myrtus communis), Marigold (Calendula officinalis) Compared with DEET against Anopheles stephensi on Human Volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"M Tavassoli,&nbsp;M Shayeghi,&nbsp;Mr Abai,&nbsp;H Vatandoost,&nbsp;M Khoobdel,&nbsp;M Salari,&nbsp;A Ghaderi,&nbsp;F Rafi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria and leishmaniasis are two most significant parasitic diseases which are endemic in Iran. Over the past decades, interest in botanical repellents has increased as a result of safety to human. The comparative efficacy of essential oils of two native plants, myrtle (Myrtus communis) and marigold (Calendula officinalis) collected from natural habitats at southern Iran was compared with DEET as synthetic repellent against Anopheles stephensi on human subjects under laboratory condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Essential oils from two species of native plants were obtained by Clevenger-type water distillation. The protection time of DEET, marigold and myrtle was assessed on human subject using screened cage method against An. stephensi. The effective dose of 50% essential oils of two latter species and DEET were determined by modified ASTM method. ED(50) and ED(90) values and related statistical parameters were calculated by probit analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The protection time of 50% essential oils of marigold and myrtle were respectively 2.15 and 4.36 hours compared to 6.23 hours for DEET 25%. The median effective dose (ED(50)) of 50% essential oils was 0.1105 and 0.6034 mg/cm(2) respectively in myrtle and marigold. The figure for DEET was 0.0023 mg/cm(2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study exhibited that the repellency of both botanical repellents was generally lower than DEET as a synthetic repellent. However the 50% essential oil of myrtle showed a moderate repellency effects compared to marigold against An. stephensi.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"10-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/26/bc/ijad-5-10.PMC3385578.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/12/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疟疾和利什曼病是伊朗流行的两种最重要的寄生虫病。在过去的几十年里,由于对人类的安全性,人们对植物驱蚊剂的兴趣越来越大。在实验室条件下,比较了伊朗南部自然生境中采集的两种本土植物——桃金娘(Myrtus communis)和万寿菊(Calendula officinalis)精油与避蚊胺(DEET)作为人工合成驱蚊剂对斯氏按蚊的驱蚊效果。方法:采用Clevenger-type水蒸馏法提取两种本土植物精油。采用屏蔽笼法对避蚊胺、万寿菊、桃金娘对安虫的防护时间进行了人体试验。stephensi。采用改进的ASTM方法测定后两种植物50%精油和避蚊胺的有效剂量。采用概率分析法计算ED(50)、ED(90)值及相关统计参数。结果:50%金盏花精油的保护时间分别为2.15和4.36小时,而25%避蚊胺精油的保护时间为6.23小时。50%精油对桃金娘和万寿菊的中位有效剂量(ED(50))分别为0.1105和0.6034 mg/cm(2)。避蚊胺含量为0.0023 mg/cm(2)。结论:两种植物驱蚊剂的驱蚊效果普遍低于避蚊胺。与万金菊相比,50%桃金娘精油对豚鼠的驱避效果中等。stephensi。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Repellency Effects of Essential Oils of Myrtle (Myrtus communis), Marigold (Calendula officinalis) Compared with DEET against Anopheles stephensi on Human Volunteers.

Repellency Effects of Essential Oils of Myrtle (Myrtus communis), Marigold (Calendula officinalis) Compared with DEET against Anopheles stephensi on Human Volunteers.

Repellency Effects of Essential Oils of Myrtle (Myrtus communis), Marigold (Calendula officinalis) Compared with DEET against Anopheles stephensi on Human Volunteers.

Repellency Effects of Essential Oils of Myrtle (Myrtus communis), Marigold (Calendula officinalis) Compared with DEET against Anopheles stephensi on Human Volunteers.

Background: Malaria and leishmaniasis are two most significant parasitic diseases which are endemic in Iran. Over the past decades, interest in botanical repellents has increased as a result of safety to human. The comparative efficacy of essential oils of two native plants, myrtle (Myrtus communis) and marigold (Calendula officinalis) collected from natural habitats at southern Iran was compared with DEET as synthetic repellent against Anopheles stephensi on human subjects under laboratory condition.

Methods: Essential oils from two species of native plants were obtained by Clevenger-type water distillation. The protection time of DEET, marigold and myrtle was assessed on human subject using screened cage method against An. stephensi. The effective dose of 50% essential oils of two latter species and DEET were determined by modified ASTM method. ED(50) and ED(90) values and related statistical parameters were calculated by probit analysis.

Results: The protection time of 50% essential oils of marigold and myrtle were respectively 2.15 and 4.36 hours compared to 6.23 hours for DEET 25%. The median effective dose (ED(50)) of 50% essential oils was 0.1105 and 0.6034 mg/cm(2) respectively in myrtle and marigold. The figure for DEET was 0.0023 mg/cm(2).

Conclusion: This study exhibited that the repellency of both botanical repellents was generally lower than DEET as a synthetic repellent. However the 50% essential oil of myrtle showed a moderate repellency effects compared to marigold against An. stephensi.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases
Iranian Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信