微创鼻瓣膜手术的解剖学比较。

David M Weeks, David D Walker, Jay M Dutton
{"title":"微创鼻瓣膜手术的解剖学比较。","authors":"David M Weeks, David D Walker, Jay M Dutton","doi":"10.1001/archfacial.2012.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo determine the quantitative effects of Z-plasty vs spreader grafts on nasal valve surface area.\n\n\nMETHODS\nEight fresh cadaver heads were used that provided 16 total nasal valve procedures. Surgical sides were randomized, and Z-plasty was performed on 8 valves and endonasal spreader grafts were performed on 8 valves. The minimal cross-sectional area at the level of the nasal valve was measured preoperatively and postoperatively using acoustic rhinometry. We then compared Z-plasty and spreader grafts using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe mean nasal surface area at the nasal valve before Z-plasty was 1.37 cm(2) (range, 0.39-2.25 cm(2)) and after Z-plasty was 1.95 cm(2) (range, 1.08-2.62 cm(2)). The mean surface area at the nasal valve before spreader grafts was 1.15 cm(2) (range, 0.75-1.48 cm(2)) and after spreader grafts was 1.48 cm(2) (0.95-1.95 cm(2)). This correlates with a mean increase in the nasal valve surface area of 65% when Z-plasty was performed (95% CI, 28%-88%; P = .007) and 31% when a spreader graft was performed (95% CI, 15%-54%; P = .01).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nZ-plasty and spreader grafts were shown to increase nasal valve surface area. Z-plasty seems to increase nasal valve surface area more than spreader grafts.","PeriodicalId":55470,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archfacial.2012.24","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomical comparison of minimally invasive nasal valve procedures.\",\"authors\":\"David M Weeks, David D Walker, Jay M Dutton\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archfacial.2012.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nTo determine the quantitative effects of Z-plasty vs spreader grafts on nasal valve surface area.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nEight fresh cadaver heads were used that provided 16 total nasal valve procedures. Surgical sides were randomized, and Z-plasty was performed on 8 valves and endonasal spreader grafts were performed on 8 valves. The minimal cross-sectional area at the level of the nasal valve was measured preoperatively and postoperatively using acoustic rhinometry. We then compared Z-plasty and spreader grafts using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe mean nasal surface area at the nasal valve before Z-plasty was 1.37 cm(2) (range, 0.39-2.25 cm(2)) and after Z-plasty was 1.95 cm(2) (range, 1.08-2.62 cm(2)). The mean surface area at the nasal valve before spreader grafts was 1.15 cm(2) (range, 0.75-1.48 cm(2)) and after spreader grafts was 1.48 cm(2) (0.95-1.95 cm(2)). This correlates with a mean increase in the nasal valve surface area of 65% when Z-plasty was performed (95% CI, 28%-88%; P = .007) and 31% when a spreader graft was performed (95% CI, 15%-54%; P = .01).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nZ-plasty and spreader grafts were shown to increase nasal valve surface area. Z-plasty seems to increase nasal valve surface area more than spreader grafts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archfacial.2012.24\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2012.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2012.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:比较z形成形术与扩张体移植对鼻瓣表面积的影响。方法:使用8个新鲜尸体头部,提供16个全鼻瓣手术。手术侧随机选取8个瓣膜行z形成形术,8个瓣膜行鼻内扩散片移植。术前和术后使用声学鼻测量术测量鼻阀水平的最小横截面积。然后,我们使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较z -成形术和扩张移植物。结果:z -成形术前鼻瓣处平均鼻表面积为1.37 cm(2)(范围0.39 ~ 2.25 cm(2)), z -成形术后平均鼻表面积为1.95 cm(2)(范围1.08 ~ 2.62 cm(2))。植片前鼻瓣平均表面积为1.15 cm(2)(范围0.75 ~ 1.48 cm(2)),植片后鼻瓣平均表面积为1.48 cm(2) (0.95 ~ 1.95 cm(2))。这与进行z -成形术时鼻阀表面积平均增加65%相关(95% CI, 28%-88%;P = .007),扩散片移植为31% (95% CI, 15%-54%;P = 0.01)。结论:z形成形术和扩张体移植可增加鼻瓣表面积。z形成形术似乎比扩散器移植物更能增加鼻瓣表面积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anatomical comparison of minimally invasive nasal valve procedures.
OBJECTIVE To determine the quantitative effects of Z-plasty vs spreader grafts on nasal valve surface area. METHODS Eight fresh cadaver heads were used that provided 16 total nasal valve procedures. Surgical sides were randomized, and Z-plasty was performed on 8 valves and endonasal spreader grafts were performed on 8 valves. The minimal cross-sectional area at the level of the nasal valve was measured preoperatively and postoperatively using acoustic rhinometry. We then compared Z-plasty and spreader grafts using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS The mean nasal surface area at the nasal valve before Z-plasty was 1.37 cm(2) (range, 0.39-2.25 cm(2)) and after Z-plasty was 1.95 cm(2) (range, 1.08-2.62 cm(2)). The mean surface area at the nasal valve before spreader grafts was 1.15 cm(2) (range, 0.75-1.48 cm(2)) and after spreader grafts was 1.48 cm(2) (0.95-1.95 cm(2)). This correlates with a mean increase in the nasal valve surface area of 65% when Z-plasty was performed (95% CI, 28%-88%; P = .007) and 31% when a spreader graft was performed (95% CI, 15%-54%; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS Z-plasty and spreader grafts were shown to increase nasal valve surface area. Z-plasty seems to increase nasal valve surface area more than spreader grafts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信