乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂对成年大鼠脑细胞外乙酰胆碱浓度的影响:一项荟萃分析。

Synapse (New York, N.y.) Pub Date : 2012-10-01 Epub Date: 2012-07-27 DOI:10.1002/syn.21581
Hamid R Noori, Sarah Fliegel, Ines Brand, Rainer Spanagel
{"title":"乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂对成年大鼠脑细胞外乙酰胆碱浓度的影响:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Hamid R Noori,&nbsp;Sarah Fliegel,&nbsp;Ines Brand,&nbsp;Rainer Spanagel","doi":"10.1002/syn.21581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vivo microdialysis has become a key method in investigating the dynamics of different neurotransmitter systems such as acetylcholine in the extracellular fluid. Depending on the sensitivity of the analytical method applied for measuring acetylcholine levels in brain dialysates, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors are often used to increase the basal acetylcholine level up to a detectable magnitude. This artificial manipulation of the system questions the outcome of pharmacological studies and has led to a large number of experiments pursuing the appropriate physiological and pharmacological concentration of the AChE inhibitors in a range between 0.01 and 100 μM. However, the complexity of the action of these substances, particularly through the involvement of muscarinic autoreceptors and the induction of an autoinhibitory effect on acetylcholine release, did not allow this quest to be resolved completely and suggests the application of advanced mathematical methods for the evaluation of acetylcholine baseline levels. Here we performed a meta-analysis on published datasets of in vivo microdialysis measurements to assess the concentration-dependent effects of various AChE inhibitors on acetylcholine levels within the prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen, and hippocampus in adult rats. In total 3255 rats were analyzed and we found that when compared with the minority of studies (14%) that did not use AChE inhibitors (these studies yielded basal levels between 0.55 and 2.71 nM depending on the brain site) an up to 350-fold increase in baseline values after the application of an inhibitor could be detected. Especially, the derivates neostigmine bromide and physostigmine sulfate seem to produce dramatic effects. Furthermore, concentration-dependent effects after the application of AChE inhibitors could not be established. In the case of neostigmine bromide an inverted concentration (0.1-10 μM)-response relationship was even detected. We conclude that although the presynaptic action of AChE inhibitors is well understood the nonphysiological and concentration-independent augmentation of the acetylcholine system requires the use of a standard protocol in order to produce replicable and comparable results. Our meta-analysis suggests the use of 0.1 μM neostigmine which produces an approximately 10-fold boost of brain baseline levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":118978,"journal":{"name":"Synapse (New York, N.y.)","volume":" ","pages":"893-901"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/syn.21581","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors on the extracellular acetylcholine concentrations in the adult rat brain: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hamid R Noori,&nbsp;Sarah Fliegel,&nbsp;Ines Brand,&nbsp;Rainer Spanagel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/syn.21581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In vivo microdialysis has become a key method in investigating the dynamics of different neurotransmitter systems such as acetylcholine in the extracellular fluid. Depending on the sensitivity of the analytical method applied for measuring acetylcholine levels in brain dialysates, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors are often used to increase the basal acetylcholine level up to a detectable magnitude. This artificial manipulation of the system questions the outcome of pharmacological studies and has led to a large number of experiments pursuing the appropriate physiological and pharmacological concentration of the AChE inhibitors in a range between 0.01 and 100 μM. However, the complexity of the action of these substances, particularly through the involvement of muscarinic autoreceptors and the induction of an autoinhibitory effect on acetylcholine release, did not allow this quest to be resolved completely and suggests the application of advanced mathematical methods for the evaluation of acetylcholine baseline levels. Here we performed a meta-analysis on published datasets of in vivo microdialysis measurements to assess the concentration-dependent effects of various AChE inhibitors on acetylcholine levels within the prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen, and hippocampus in adult rats. In total 3255 rats were analyzed and we found that when compared with the minority of studies (14%) that did not use AChE inhibitors (these studies yielded basal levels between 0.55 and 2.71 nM depending on the brain site) an up to 350-fold increase in baseline values after the application of an inhibitor could be detected. Especially, the derivates neostigmine bromide and physostigmine sulfate seem to produce dramatic effects. Furthermore, concentration-dependent effects after the application of AChE inhibitors could not be established. In the case of neostigmine bromide an inverted concentration (0.1-10 μM)-response relationship was even detected. We conclude that although the presynaptic action of AChE inhibitors is well understood the nonphysiological and concentration-independent augmentation of the acetylcholine system requires the use of a standard protocol in order to produce replicable and comparable results. Our meta-analysis suggests the use of 0.1 μM neostigmine which produces an approximately 10-fold boost of brain baseline levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":118978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Synapse (New York, N.y.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"893-901\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/syn.21581\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Synapse (New York, N.y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.21581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/7/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synapse (New York, N.y.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.21581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

体内微透析已成为研究细胞外液中不同神经递质系统(如乙酰胆碱)动力学的关键方法。根据用于测量脑透析液中乙酰胆碱水平的分析方法的灵敏度,乙酰胆碱酯酶(AChE)抑制剂通常用于将基础乙酰胆碱水平提高到可检测的幅度。这种对系统的人为操纵对药理学研究的结果提出了质疑,并导致了大量的实验,以追求在0.01至100 μM范围内适当的AChE抑制剂的生理和药理学浓度。然而,这些物质作用的复杂性,特别是通过毒蕈碱自身受体的参与和诱导对乙酰胆碱释放的自身抑制作用,不允许这个问题得到完全解决,并建议应用先进的数学方法来评估乙酰胆碱基线水平。在此,我们对已发表的体内微透析测量数据集进行了荟萃分析,以评估各种乙酰胆碱抑制剂对成年大鼠前额皮质、伏隔核、尾状壳核和海马内乙酰胆碱水平的浓度依赖性影响。总共分析了3255只大鼠,我们发现,与少数未使用乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂的研究(14%)相比(这些研究的基础水平在0.55至2.71 nM之间,取决于大脑部位),应用抑制剂后可以检测到基线值增加350倍。特别是其衍生物溴化新斯的明和硫酸重斯的明似乎产生了显著的效果。此外,乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂应用后的浓度依赖效应无法建立。对于溴化新斯的明,甚至检测到浓度(0.1 ~ 10 μM)的反向响应关系。我们得出的结论是,尽管乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂的突触前作用被很好地理解,但乙酰胆碱系统的非生理性和浓度无关的增强需要使用标准方案,以产生可复制和可比较的结果。我们的荟萃分析表明,使用0.1 μM的新斯的明可以使大脑基线水平提高约10倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors on the extracellular acetylcholine concentrations in the adult rat brain: a meta-analysis.

In vivo microdialysis has become a key method in investigating the dynamics of different neurotransmitter systems such as acetylcholine in the extracellular fluid. Depending on the sensitivity of the analytical method applied for measuring acetylcholine levels in brain dialysates, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors are often used to increase the basal acetylcholine level up to a detectable magnitude. This artificial manipulation of the system questions the outcome of pharmacological studies and has led to a large number of experiments pursuing the appropriate physiological and pharmacological concentration of the AChE inhibitors in a range between 0.01 and 100 μM. However, the complexity of the action of these substances, particularly through the involvement of muscarinic autoreceptors and the induction of an autoinhibitory effect on acetylcholine release, did not allow this quest to be resolved completely and suggests the application of advanced mathematical methods for the evaluation of acetylcholine baseline levels. Here we performed a meta-analysis on published datasets of in vivo microdialysis measurements to assess the concentration-dependent effects of various AChE inhibitors on acetylcholine levels within the prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen, and hippocampus in adult rats. In total 3255 rats were analyzed and we found that when compared with the minority of studies (14%) that did not use AChE inhibitors (these studies yielded basal levels between 0.55 and 2.71 nM depending on the brain site) an up to 350-fold increase in baseline values after the application of an inhibitor could be detected. Especially, the derivates neostigmine bromide and physostigmine sulfate seem to produce dramatic effects. Furthermore, concentration-dependent effects after the application of AChE inhibitors could not be established. In the case of neostigmine bromide an inverted concentration (0.1-10 μM)-response relationship was even detected. We conclude that although the presynaptic action of AChE inhibitors is well understood the nonphysiological and concentration-independent augmentation of the acetylcholine system requires the use of a standard protocol in order to produce replicable and comparable results. Our meta-analysis suggests the use of 0.1 μM neostigmine which produces an approximately 10-fold boost of brain baseline levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信