学习阅读将视觉分析技能与字素-音素映射结合起来:来自文盲的证据。

Frontiers in evolutionary neuroscience Pub Date : 2012-06-12 eCollection Date: 2012-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnevo.2012.00008
Thomas Lachmann, Gunjan Khera, Narayanan Srinivasan, Cees van Leeuwen
{"title":"学习阅读将视觉分析技能与字素-音素映射结合起来:来自文盲的证据。","authors":"Thomas Lachmann,&nbsp;Gunjan Khera,&nbsp;Narayanan Srinivasan,&nbsp;Cees van Leeuwen","doi":"10.3389/fnevo.2012.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Learning to read puts evolutionary established speech and visual object recognition functions to novel use. As we previously showed, this leads to particular rearrangements and differentiations in these functions, for instance the habitual preference for holistic perceptual organization in visual object recognition and its suppression in perceiving letters. We performed the experiment in which the differentiation between holistic non-letter processing and analytic letter processing in literates was originally shown (van Leeuwen and Lachmann, 2004) with illiterate adults. The original differentiation is absent in illiterates; they uniformly showed analytic perception for both letters and non-letters. The result implies that analytic visual perception is not a secondary development resulting from learning to read but, rather, a primary mode of perceptual organization on a par with holistic perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":88241,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in evolutionary neuroscience","volume":"4 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3389/fnevo.2012.00008","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning to read aligns visual analytical skills with grapheme-phoneme mapping: evidence from illiterates.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Lachmann,&nbsp;Gunjan Khera,&nbsp;Narayanan Srinivasan,&nbsp;Cees van Leeuwen\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnevo.2012.00008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Learning to read puts evolutionary established speech and visual object recognition functions to novel use. As we previously showed, this leads to particular rearrangements and differentiations in these functions, for instance the habitual preference for holistic perceptual organization in visual object recognition and its suppression in perceiving letters. We performed the experiment in which the differentiation between holistic non-letter processing and analytic letter processing in literates was originally shown (van Leeuwen and Lachmann, 2004) with illiterate adults. The original differentiation is absent in illiterates; they uniformly showed analytic perception for both letters and non-letters. The result implies that analytic visual perception is not a secondary development resulting from learning to read but, rather, a primary mode of perceptual organization on a par with holistic perception.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in evolutionary neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3389/fnevo.2012.00008\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in evolutionary neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2012.00008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in evolutionary neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2012.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

学习阅读使进化中建立的语言和视觉物体识别功能有了新的用途。正如我们之前所展示的,这导致了这些功能的特殊重排和区分,例如,在视觉对象识别中对整体感知组织的习惯性偏好以及在感知字母时对其的抑制。我们进行了一项实验,在该实验中,文盲的整体非字母处理和分析字母处理之间的区别最初被证明(van Leeuwen和Lachmann, 2004)。文盲没有原始的分化;他们对字母和非字母都表现出一致的分析感知。结果表明,分析性视觉感知不是学习阅读的二次发展,而是与整体感知相当的感知组织的主要模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Learning to read aligns visual analytical skills with grapheme-phoneme mapping: evidence from illiterates.

Learning to read aligns visual analytical skills with grapheme-phoneme mapping: evidence from illiterates.

Learning to read aligns visual analytical skills with grapheme-phoneme mapping: evidence from illiterates.

Learning to read aligns visual analytical skills with grapheme-phoneme mapping: evidence from illiterates.

Learning to read puts evolutionary established speech and visual object recognition functions to novel use. As we previously showed, this leads to particular rearrangements and differentiations in these functions, for instance the habitual preference for holistic perceptual organization in visual object recognition and its suppression in perceiving letters. We performed the experiment in which the differentiation between holistic non-letter processing and analytic letter processing in literates was originally shown (van Leeuwen and Lachmann, 2004) with illiterate adults. The original differentiation is absent in illiterates; they uniformly showed analytic perception for both letters and non-letters. The result implies that analytic visual perception is not a secondary development resulting from learning to read but, rather, a primary mode of perceptual organization on a par with holistic perception.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信