胸腹主动脉瘤混合修复的现状及未来发展方向。

Gustavo S Oderich, Bernardo C Mendes, Peter Gloviczki, Manju Kalra, Audra A Duncan, Thomas C Bower
{"title":"胸腹主动脉瘤混合修复的现状及未来发展方向。","authors":"Gustavo S Oderich,&nbsp;Bernardo C Mendes,&nbsp;Peter Gloviczki,&nbsp;Manju Kalra,&nbsp;Audra A Duncan,&nbsp;Thomas C Bower","doi":"10.1177/1531003512445808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hybrid procedures were introduced as a less invasive alternative to open conventional repair, avoiding thoracotomy, single-lung ventilation, and in many patients, aortic cross-clamping. Despite these potential advantages over open repair, results of hybrid repair have varied in the literature, with several reports indicating high morbidity and mortality rates. It is likely that once fenestrated and branched endografts receive approval from the Food and Drug Administration for clinical use, indications for hybrid repair of complex aortic aneurysms will further diminish. This article summarizes the current state of the art on patient selection, techniques, and results of hybrid procedures for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.</p>","PeriodicalId":87201,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy","volume":"24 1","pages":"14-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1531003512445808","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current role and future directions of hybrid repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo S Oderich,&nbsp;Bernardo C Mendes,&nbsp;Peter Gloviczki,&nbsp;Manju Kalra,&nbsp;Audra A Duncan,&nbsp;Thomas C Bower\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1531003512445808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hybrid procedures were introduced as a less invasive alternative to open conventional repair, avoiding thoracotomy, single-lung ventilation, and in many patients, aortic cross-clamping. Despite these potential advantages over open repair, results of hybrid repair have varied in the literature, with several reports indicating high morbidity and mortality rates. It is likely that once fenestrated and branched endografts receive approval from the Food and Drug Administration for clinical use, indications for hybrid repair of complex aortic aneurysms will further diminish. This article summarizes the current state of the art on patient selection, techniques, and results of hybrid procedures for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"14-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1531003512445808\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1531003512445808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1531003512445808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

混合手术作为一种侵入性较小的传统开放式修复方法,避免了开胸、单肺通气和许多患者的主动脉交叉夹持。尽管与开放式修复相比有这些潜在的优势,但混合修复的结果在文献中有所不同,有几篇报道表明高发病率和死亡率。有可能一旦开窗和分支的内移植物获得美国食品和药物管理局的临床应用批准,复合修复复杂主动脉瘤的适应症将进一步减少。本文总结了目前胸腹主动脉瘤混合手术的患者选择、技术和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current role and future directions of hybrid repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Hybrid procedures were introduced as a less invasive alternative to open conventional repair, avoiding thoracotomy, single-lung ventilation, and in many patients, aortic cross-clamping. Despite these potential advantages over open repair, results of hybrid repair have varied in the literature, with several reports indicating high morbidity and mortality rates. It is likely that once fenestrated and branched endografts receive approval from the Food and Drug Administration for clinical use, indications for hybrid repair of complex aortic aneurysms will further diminish. This article summarizes the current state of the art on patient selection, techniques, and results of hybrid procedures for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信