80岁以上急性阑尾炎的临床特点及手术安全性。

Kwon Sang Moon, Yong Hwan Jung, Eun Hun Lee, Yong Hee Hwang
{"title":"80岁以上急性阑尾炎的临床特点及手术安全性。","authors":"Kwon Sang Moon,&nbsp;Yong Hwan Jung,&nbsp;Eun Hun Lee,&nbsp;Yong Hee Hwang","doi":"10.3393/jksc.2012.28.2.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes, including surgical safety, in patients over 80 years of age who underwent an appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved 160 elderly patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis: 28 patients over 80 years old and 132 patients between 65 and 79 years old.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of positive rebound tenderness was significantly higher in the over 80 group (P = 0.002). Comparisons of comorbidity, diagnostic tool and delay in surgical treatment between the two groups were not statistically different. American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly higher in the over 80 group than in the 65 to 79 group (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5; P < 0.00005). Comparisons of operative times and use of drainage between the two groups were not statistically different. In the pathologic findings, periappendiceal abscess was more frequent in the over 80 group (P = 0.011). No significant differences existed between the two groups when comparing the results of gas out and the time to liquid diet, but the postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the over 80 group (P = 0.001). Among the postoperative complications, pulmonary complication was significantly higher in the over 80 group (P = 0.005). However, operative mortality was zero in each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In case of suspicious appendicitis in elderly patients, efforts should be made to use aggressive diagnostic intervention, do appropriate surgery and prevent pulmonary complications especially in patients over 80 years of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":17346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology","volume":"28 2","pages":"94-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/75/jksc-28-94.PMC3349817.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Safety in Patients with Acute Appendicitis Aged over 80.\",\"authors\":\"Kwon Sang Moon,&nbsp;Yong Hwan Jung,&nbsp;Eun Hun Lee,&nbsp;Yong Hee Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.3393/jksc.2012.28.2.94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes, including surgical safety, in patients over 80 years of age who underwent an appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved 160 elderly patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis: 28 patients over 80 years old and 132 patients between 65 and 79 years old.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of positive rebound tenderness was significantly higher in the over 80 group (P = 0.002). Comparisons of comorbidity, diagnostic tool and delay in surgical treatment between the two groups were not statistically different. American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly higher in the over 80 group than in the 65 to 79 group (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5; P < 0.00005). Comparisons of operative times and use of drainage between the two groups were not statistically different. In the pathologic findings, periappendiceal abscess was more frequent in the over 80 group (P = 0.011). No significant differences existed between the two groups when comparing the results of gas out and the time to liquid diet, but the postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the over 80 group (P = 0.001). Among the postoperative complications, pulmonary complication was significantly higher in the over 80 group (P = 0.005). However, operative mortality was zero in each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In case of suspicious appendicitis in elderly patients, efforts should be made to use aggressive diagnostic intervention, do appropriate surgery and prevent pulmonary complications especially in patients over 80 years of age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"94-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/75/jksc-28-94.PMC3349817.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.2.94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.2.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估80岁以上阑尾切除术患者的临床特征和治疗结果,包括手术安全性。方法:本研究纳入160例因急性阑尾炎行阑尾切除术的老年患者,其中28例年龄在80岁以上,132例年龄在65 ~ 79岁之间。结果:80岁以上年龄组的阳性反跳压痛发生率明显高于对照组(P = 0.002)。两组的合并症、诊断工具和手术治疗延迟比较无统计学差异。80岁以上组的美国麻醉医师学会评分显著高于65 ~ 79岁组(2.4±0.5∶1.6±0.5;P < 0.00005)。两组手术次数及引流使用比较无统计学差异。病理表现上,80岁以上年龄组阑尾周围脓肿发生率较高(P = 0.011)。两组患者排气结果和流食时间比较差异无统计学意义,但80岁以上患者术后住院时间明显延长(P = 0.001)。术后并发症中,80岁以上年龄组肺部并发症明显高于对照组(P = 0.005)。然而,两组的手术死亡率均为零。结论:老年疑为阑尾炎的患者,尤其是80岁以上的老年患者,应积极进行诊断干预,适当行手术治疗,预防肺部并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Safety in Patients with Acute Appendicitis Aged over 80.

Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Safety in Patients with Acute Appendicitis Aged over 80.

Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Safety in Patients with Acute Appendicitis Aged over 80.

Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Safety in Patients with Acute Appendicitis Aged over 80.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes, including surgical safety, in patients over 80 years of age who underwent an appendectomy.

Methods: This study involved 160 elderly patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis: 28 patients over 80 years old and 132 patients between 65 and 79 years old.

Results: The rate of positive rebound tenderness was significantly higher in the over 80 group (P = 0.002). Comparisons of comorbidity, diagnostic tool and delay in surgical treatment between the two groups were not statistically different. American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly higher in the over 80 group than in the 65 to 79 group (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5; P < 0.00005). Comparisons of operative times and use of drainage between the two groups were not statistically different. In the pathologic findings, periappendiceal abscess was more frequent in the over 80 group (P = 0.011). No significant differences existed between the two groups when comparing the results of gas out and the time to liquid diet, but the postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the over 80 group (P = 0.001). Among the postoperative complications, pulmonary complication was significantly higher in the over 80 group (P = 0.005). However, operative mortality was zero in each group.

Conclusion: In case of suspicious appendicitis in elderly patients, efforts should be made to use aggressive diagnostic intervention, do appropriate surgery and prevent pulmonary complications especially in patients over 80 years of age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信