CBCT比较SureSmile和常规边缘治疗的前牙根吸收。

Neepa Patel, G Frans Currier, Onur Kadioglu, J Peter Kierl, Valerie J Skaggs
{"title":"CBCT比较SureSmile和常规边缘治疗的前牙根吸收。","authors":"Neepa Patel,&nbsp;G Frans Currier,&nbsp;Onur Kadioglu,&nbsp;J Peter Kierl,&nbsp;Valerie J Skaggs","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To utilize cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to analyze the amount of linear root resorption that occurs in maxillary and mandibular permanent incisors during orthodontic treatment when comparing the SureSmile technique with conventional edgewise treatment. In addition, patient and treatment factors that may be correlated with root resorption were studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of 28 patients (14 SureSmile and 14 edgewise) treated in an orthodontic office were used for this study. CBCTs were taken of all patients prior to (T1) and after completion of orthodontic treatment (T2). Total tooth length of the permanent incisors were measured on the CBCTs at T1 and T2. Root resorption was calculated for each tooth by subtracting T1 from T2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences in mean root resorption (MRR) were found for the permanent incisors when comparing SureSmile patients with conventional edgewise patients. The MRR for each tooth was found to be less than 1 mm when using either treatment modality. Subjects with increased resorption included Class II malocclusion, severe overjet, and treatment time greater than or equal to 25 months. Sex and the use of Class II elastics showed no significant differences in mean root resorption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No differences were found in root resorption of the permanent incisors when comparing SureSmile and edgewise treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":89450,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement","volume":"13 1","pages":"100-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A CBCT comparison of anterior root resorption in SureSmile and conventional edgewise treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Neepa Patel,&nbsp;G Frans Currier,&nbsp;Onur Kadioglu,&nbsp;J Peter Kierl,&nbsp;Valerie J Skaggs\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To utilize cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to analyze the amount of linear root resorption that occurs in maxillary and mandibular permanent incisors during orthodontic treatment when comparing the SureSmile technique with conventional edgewise treatment. In addition, patient and treatment factors that may be correlated with root resorption were studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of 28 patients (14 SureSmile and 14 edgewise) treated in an orthodontic office were used for this study. CBCTs were taken of all patients prior to (T1) and after completion of orthodontic treatment (T2). Total tooth length of the permanent incisors were measured on the CBCTs at T1 and T2. Root resorption was calculated for each tooth by subtracting T1 from T2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences in mean root resorption (MRR) were found for the permanent incisors when comparing SureSmile patients with conventional edgewise patients. The MRR for each tooth was found to be less than 1 mm when using either treatment modality. Subjects with increased resorption included Class II malocclusion, severe overjet, and treatment time greater than or equal to 25 months. Sex and the use of Class II elastics showed no significant differences in mean root resorption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No differences were found in root resorption of the permanent incisors when comparing SureSmile and edgewise treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"100-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)分析在正畸治疗中上颌和下颌恒切牙线状牙根吸收的数量,并与常规边缘治疗进行比较。此外,我们还研究了可能与牙根吸收相关的患者和治疗因素。方法:28例患者(14例surresmile和14例edgewise)在正畸诊所接受治疗。对所有患者在正畸治疗前(T1)和完成正畸治疗后(T2)进行cbct检查。在T1和T2时用cbct测量恒切牙的总牙长。用T2减去T1计算每颗牙的牙根吸收。结果:固定门牙的平均牙根吸收(MRR)与常规门牙患者比较无统计学差异。两种治疗方式的MRR均小于1mm。吸收增加的受试者包括II类错颌,严重的覆盖,治疗时间大于或等于25个月。性别和II类弹性材料的使用在平均根吸收方面没有显著差异。结论:在恒切牙根吸收方面,SureSmile与边缘治疗无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A CBCT comparison of anterior root resorption in SureSmile and conventional edgewise treatments.

Aim: To utilize cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to analyze the amount of linear root resorption that occurs in maxillary and mandibular permanent incisors during orthodontic treatment when comparing the SureSmile technique with conventional edgewise treatment. In addition, patient and treatment factors that may be correlated with root resorption were studied.

Methods: The records of 28 patients (14 SureSmile and 14 edgewise) treated in an orthodontic office were used for this study. CBCTs were taken of all patients prior to (T1) and after completion of orthodontic treatment (T2). Total tooth length of the permanent incisors were measured on the CBCTs at T1 and T2. Root resorption was calculated for each tooth by subtracting T1 from T2.

Results: No statistically significant differences in mean root resorption (MRR) were found for the permanent incisors when comparing SureSmile patients with conventional edgewise patients. The MRR for each tooth was found to be less than 1 mm when using either treatment modality. Subjects with increased resorption included Class II malocclusion, severe overjet, and treatment time greater than or equal to 25 months. Sex and the use of Class II elastics showed no significant differences in mean root resorption.

Conclusion: No differences were found in root resorption of the permanent incisors when comparing SureSmile and edgewise treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信