新旧托槽摩擦力的体内比较。

Alexandre A Ribeiro, Cláudia T Mattos, Antonio Carlos O Ruellas, Monica T S Araújo, Carlos Nelson Elias
{"title":"新旧托槽摩擦力的体内比较。","authors":"Alexandre A Ribeiro,&nbsp;Cláudia T Mattos,&nbsp;Antonio Carlos O Ruellas,&nbsp;Monica T S Araújo,&nbsp;Carlos Nelson Elias","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies that evaluate frictional force on orthodontic brackets usually compare ligature, archwire size, bracket alloys, and systems. However, these studies do not simulate in vitro specific conditions of in vivo situations. Aiming to evaluate some conditions not created in vitro, 30 used standard edgewise brackets (30.7 months) collected from patients in the end of treatment (group 1) and 20 as-received brackets (group 2) of the same brand were compared. The brackets used in vivo were carefully removed to avoid deformation. Frictional resistance tests of both groups were performed in a universal testing machine using a system that standardizes normal force. Five brackets from each group were analyzed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Student t tests were used to compare the frictional force between groups 1 and 2 and showed a statistically difference (32.91 and 21.22 g, respectively). The Mann-Whitney test showed that group 1 had more organic matter attached to the slot surface compared with group 2 (P < .05). However, a comparison of topography between the groups did not show a statistically significant difference. SEM analysis showed a statistically high correlation (r = 0.73) between organic matter adhesion to the slot surface and frictional resistance. However, the results were not significant. These results indicate the clearance of brackets and wires during sliding mechanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":89450,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement","volume":"13 1","pages":"e44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vivo comparison of the friction forces in new and used brackets.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre A Ribeiro,&nbsp;Cláudia T Mattos,&nbsp;Antonio Carlos O Ruellas,&nbsp;Monica T S Araújo,&nbsp;Carlos Nelson Elias\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies that evaluate frictional force on orthodontic brackets usually compare ligature, archwire size, bracket alloys, and systems. However, these studies do not simulate in vitro specific conditions of in vivo situations. Aiming to evaluate some conditions not created in vitro, 30 used standard edgewise brackets (30.7 months) collected from patients in the end of treatment (group 1) and 20 as-received brackets (group 2) of the same brand were compared. The brackets used in vivo were carefully removed to avoid deformation. Frictional resistance tests of both groups were performed in a universal testing machine using a system that standardizes normal force. Five brackets from each group were analyzed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Student t tests were used to compare the frictional force between groups 1 and 2 and showed a statistically difference (32.91 and 21.22 g, respectively). The Mann-Whitney test showed that group 1 had more organic matter attached to the slot surface compared with group 2 (P < .05). However, a comparison of topography between the groups did not show a statistically significant difference. SEM analysis showed a statistically high correlation (r = 0.73) between organic matter adhesion to the slot surface and frictional resistance. However, the results were not significant. These results indicate the clearance of brackets and wires during sliding mechanics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"e44-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估正畸托槽摩擦力的研究通常比较结扎法、弓丝尺寸、托槽合金和系统。然而,这些研究并没有模拟体内情况的体外特定条件。为了评估一些体外未创造的条件,我们比较了治疗结束时从患者中收集的30个(30.7个月)使用标准楔形托槽(1组)和20个相同品牌的接受托槽(2组)。小心取下体内使用的托槽,避免变形。两组的摩擦阻力测试均在通用试验机中使用标准化法向力系统进行。用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对每组5个支架进行分析。采用学生t检验比较1组和2组的摩擦力,差异有统计学意义(分别为32.91 g和21.22 g)。Mann-Whitney检验结果显示,1组槽面附着有机质高于2组(P < 0.05)。然而,组间地形的比较没有显示出统计学上的显著差异。SEM分析显示,有机物质粘附在槽表面与摩擦阻力之间具有统计学上的高相关性(r = 0.73)。然而,结果并不显著。这些结果反映了在滑动力学过程中支架和钢丝的间隙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vivo comparison of the friction forces in new and used brackets.

Studies that evaluate frictional force on orthodontic brackets usually compare ligature, archwire size, bracket alloys, and systems. However, these studies do not simulate in vitro specific conditions of in vivo situations. Aiming to evaluate some conditions not created in vitro, 30 used standard edgewise brackets (30.7 months) collected from patients in the end of treatment (group 1) and 20 as-received brackets (group 2) of the same brand were compared. The brackets used in vivo were carefully removed to avoid deformation. Frictional resistance tests of both groups were performed in a universal testing machine using a system that standardizes normal force. Five brackets from each group were analyzed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Student t tests were used to compare the frictional force between groups 1 and 2 and showed a statistically difference (32.91 and 21.22 g, respectively). The Mann-Whitney test showed that group 1 had more organic matter attached to the slot surface compared with group 2 (P < .05). However, a comparison of topography between the groups did not show a statistically significant difference. SEM analysis showed a statistically high correlation (r = 0.73) between organic matter adhesion to the slot surface and frictional resistance. However, the results were not significant. These results indicate the clearance of brackets and wires during sliding mechanics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信