使用管理数据来衡量从业人员合作的程度:“相互关联”的护理在一大群家庭医生中很常见。

Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-10-25
Douglas G Manuel, Kelvin Lam, Sarah Maaten, Julie Klein-Geltink
{"title":"使用管理数据来衡量从业人员合作的程度:“相互关联”的护理在一大群家庭医生中很常见。","authors":"Douglas G Manuel,&nbsp;Kelvin Lam,&nbsp;Sarah Maaten,&nbsp;Julie Klein-Geltink","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care practitioners in jurisdictions around the world are encouraged to work in groups. The extent to which they actually do so, however, is not often measured. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the potential for administrative data to measure how practitioners are interconnected through their care of patients. Our example examined the interconnected care provided by family physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We defined a physician as being \"interconnected\" with another physician if these 2 physicians provided at least 1% of their clinic visits over a 2-year period to the same patients. We examined a cohort of 2945 primary care physicians in 309 Family Health Networks and Family Health Groups in Ontario, Canada, in 2005/06. In total, 9.3 million physician visits for 2.1 million patients were studied. For each group practice we calculated the number of interconnected physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians had, on average, 2.2 interconnected physician partners (median=1; 25th and 75th percentile: 0, 3). Physicians saw mainly their own listed patients, and 7.9% (median=5.9%; 25th and 75th percentile: 2.4%, 11.6%) of their visits were provided to patients of their interconnected partners. The number of interconnected physicians was higher in group practices that had more physicians, but levelled to 2.5 interconnected physicians in practices with 8 or 9 physicians.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Routinely collected administrative data can be used to examine how health care is organized and delivered in groups or networks of practitioners. This study's concept of interconnected care provided by primary care physicians within groups could be expanded to include other practitioners and, indeed, entire health care systems using more complex network analysis methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"5 4","pages":"e177-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/50/06/OpenMed-05-e177.PMC3345380.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using administrative data to measure the extent to which practitioners work together: \\\"interconnected\\\" care is common in a large cohort of family physicians.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas G Manuel,&nbsp;Kelvin Lam,&nbsp;Sarah Maaten,&nbsp;Julie Klein-Geltink\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care practitioners in jurisdictions around the world are encouraged to work in groups. The extent to which they actually do so, however, is not often measured. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the potential for administrative data to measure how practitioners are interconnected through their care of patients. Our example examined the interconnected care provided by family physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We defined a physician as being \\\"interconnected\\\" with another physician if these 2 physicians provided at least 1% of their clinic visits over a 2-year period to the same patients. We examined a cohort of 2945 primary care physicians in 309 Family Health Networks and Family Health Groups in Ontario, Canada, in 2005/06. In total, 9.3 million physician visits for 2.1 million patients were studied. For each group practice we calculated the number of interconnected physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians had, on average, 2.2 interconnected physician partners (median=1; 25th and 75th percentile: 0, 3). Physicians saw mainly their own listed patients, and 7.9% (median=5.9%; 25th and 75th percentile: 2.4%, 11.6%) of their visits were provided to patients of their interconnected partners. The number of interconnected physicians was higher in group practices that had more physicians, but levelled to 2.5 interconnected physicians in practices with 8 or 9 physicians.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Routinely collected administrative data can be used to examine how health care is organized and delivered in groups or networks of practitioners. This study's concept of interconnected care provided by primary care physicians within groups could be expanded to include other practitioners and, indeed, entire health care systems using more complex network analysis methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"e177-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/50/06/OpenMed-05-e177.PMC3345380.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鼓励世界各地司法管辖区的卫生保健从业人员以小组形式工作。然而,他们在多大程度上真正做到了这一点,却常常无法衡量。本文的目的是展示潜在的管理数据,以衡量从业人员如何通过他们的病人护理相互联系。我们的例子检查了家庭医生提供的相互关联的护理。方法:我们将一名医生与另一名医生定义为“相互关联”,如果这两名医生在2年期间为同一患者提供了至少1%的门诊就诊。我们在2005/06年度对加拿大安大略省309个家庭健康网络和家庭健康团体的2945名初级保健医生进行了调查。总共研究了210万名患者的930万次医生就诊。对于每一个小组实践,我们计算相互联系的医生的数量。结果:医生平均有2.2个相互联系的医生伴侣(中位数=1;第25和75百分位:0,3)。医生主要看到自己列出的患者,7.9%(中位数=5.9%;第25和75百分位:2.4%,11.6%),他们的就诊是提供给他们相互联系的伴侣的患者。在拥有更多医生的团体实践中,相互联系的医生数量更高,但在拥有8或9名医生的团体实践中,相互联系的医生数量为2.5名。解释:常规收集的行政数据可用于检查医疗保健是如何组织的,并在团体或从业者网络提供。本研究的初级保健医生在群体内提供相互关联的护理的概念可以扩展到包括其他从业人员,实际上,整个卫生保健系统使用更复杂的网络分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using administrative data to measure the extent to which practitioners work together: "interconnected" care is common in a large cohort of family physicians.

Using administrative data to measure the extent to which practitioners work together: "interconnected" care is common in a large cohort of family physicians.

Using administrative data to measure the extent to which practitioners work together: "interconnected" care is common in a large cohort of family physicians.

Using administrative data to measure the extent to which practitioners work together: "interconnected" care is common in a large cohort of family physicians.

Background: Health care practitioners in jurisdictions around the world are encouraged to work in groups. The extent to which they actually do so, however, is not often measured. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the potential for administrative data to measure how practitioners are interconnected through their care of patients. Our example examined the interconnected care provided by family physicians.

Methods: We defined a physician as being "interconnected" with another physician if these 2 physicians provided at least 1% of their clinic visits over a 2-year period to the same patients. We examined a cohort of 2945 primary care physicians in 309 Family Health Networks and Family Health Groups in Ontario, Canada, in 2005/06. In total, 9.3 million physician visits for 2.1 million patients were studied. For each group practice we calculated the number of interconnected physicians.

Results: Physicians had, on average, 2.2 interconnected physician partners (median=1; 25th and 75th percentile: 0, 3). Physicians saw mainly their own listed patients, and 7.9% (median=5.9%; 25th and 75th percentile: 2.4%, 11.6%) of their visits were provided to patients of their interconnected partners. The number of interconnected physicians was higher in group practices that had more physicians, but levelled to 2.5 interconnected physicians in practices with 8 or 9 physicians.

Interpretation: Routinely collected administrative data can be used to examine how health care is organized and delivered in groups or networks of practitioners. This study's concept of interconnected care provided by primary care physicians within groups could be expanded to include other practitioners and, indeed, entire health care systems using more complex network analysis methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信