原发性乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结分期的分子分析与组织病理学比较:b - close - 1研究结果。

Laia Bernet Vegué, Federico Rojo, David Hardisson, Alicia Córdoba Iturriagagoitia, Maria José Panadés, Ana Velasco, Eugeni López Bonet, Rafael Cano Muñoz, Luis Polo
{"title":"原发性乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结分期的分子分析与组织病理学比较:b - close - 1研究结果。","authors":"Laia Bernet Vegué,&nbsp;Federico Rojo,&nbsp;David Hardisson,&nbsp;Alicia Córdoba Iturriagagoitia,&nbsp;Maria José Panadés,&nbsp;Ana Velasco,&nbsp;Eugeni López Bonet,&nbsp;Rafael Cano Muñoz,&nbsp;Luis Polo","doi":"10.1097/PDM.0b013e318241117b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In breast cancer, the number of lymph node metastases is the strongest predictor of outcome. However, histopathology may underestimate the frequency of metastasis. Here we compare automated molecular detection of cytokeratin 19 mRNA by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) with histopathology of single tissue sections for the staging of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer. Axillary lymph nodes were collected from 55 patients with primary breast cancer and sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases. The central 1-mm portion of each node was processed for hematoxylin-eosin staining, and the remaining tissue was analyzed by OSNA. According to OSNA, histopathology misclassified 41.8% of patients as negative for axillary node metastasis (P=0.007). Of the individual nodes considered negative by histopathology, 4.5% contained micrometastases and 2.5% contained macrometastases according to OSNA. Furthermore, 80% of micrometastases identified by histopathology were reclassified as macrometastases by OSNA. Histopathology failed to identify 81.1% of nodes shown to contain metastasis by OSNA. However, OSNA yielded no false-negative results. On the basis of OSNA results, 3 patients were reclassified to a higher pathologic stage. The number of SLN and non-SLN metastases was unrelated according to OSNA (P=0.891). These results show that, compared with molecular detection, histopathology of single tissue sections significantly underestimates the frequency of axillary node metastases. We discuss the implications of these findings in light of current recommendations on the staging of breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11235,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","volume":"21 2","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e318241117b","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of molecular analysis and histopathology for axillary lymph node staging in primary breast cancer: results of the B-CLOSER-I study.\",\"authors\":\"Laia Bernet Vegué,&nbsp;Federico Rojo,&nbsp;David Hardisson,&nbsp;Alicia Córdoba Iturriagagoitia,&nbsp;Maria José Panadés,&nbsp;Ana Velasco,&nbsp;Eugeni López Bonet,&nbsp;Rafael Cano Muñoz,&nbsp;Luis Polo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PDM.0b013e318241117b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In breast cancer, the number of lymph node metastases is the strongest predictor of outcome. However, histopathology may underestimate the frequency of metastasis. Here we compare automated molecular detection of cytokeratin 19 mRNA by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) with histopathology of single tissue sections for the staging of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer. Axillary lymph nodes were collected from 55 patients with primary breast cancer and sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases. The central 1-mm portion of each node was processed for hematoxylin-eosin staining, and the remaining tissue was analyzed by OSNA. According to OSNA, histopathology misclassified 41.8% of patients as negative for axillary node metastasis (P=0.007). Of the individual nodes considered negative by histopathology, 4.5% contained micrometastases and 2.5% contained macrometastases according to OSNA. Furthermore, 80% of micrometastases identified by histopathology were reclassified as macrometastases by OSNA. Histopathology failed to identify 81.1% of nodes shown to contain metastasis by OSNA. However, OSNA yielded no false-negative results. On the basis of OSNA results, 3 patients were reclassified to a higher pathologic stage. The number of SLN and non-SLN metastases was unrelated according to OSNA (P=0.891). These results show that, compared with molecular detection, histopathology of single tissue sections significantly underestimates the frequency of axillary node metastases. We discuss the implications of these findings in light of current recommendations on the staging of breast cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"69-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e318241117b\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e318241117b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e318241117b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

在乳腺癌中,淋巴结转移的数量是预后的最强预测因子。然而,组织病理学可能低估了转移的频率。在这里,我们比较了一步核酸扩增(OSNA)自动分子检测细胞角蛋白19 mRNA与单个组织切片的组织病理学对乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结分期的影响。本文收集55例原发性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移患者的腋窝淋巴结。每个淋巴结的中心1mm部分进行苏木精-伊红染色,其余组织进行OSNA分析。根据OSNA, 41.8%的患者组织病理学误诊为腋窝淋巴结转移阴性(P=0.007)。根据OSNA,在组织病理学认为阴性的单个淋巴结中,4.5%包含微转移,2.5%包含大转移。此外,80%经组织病理学鉴定的微转移被OSNA重新分类为大转移。组织病理学未发现81.1%的淋巴结经OSNA显示有转移。然而,OSNA没有产生假阴性结果。根据OSNA结果,3例患者被重新划分到更高的病理阶段。根据OSNA, SLN和非SLN转移数无相关性(P=0.891)。这些结果表明,与分子检测相比,单组织切片的组织病理学明显低估了腋窝淋巴结转移的频率。我们根据目前乳腺癌分期的建议讨论这些发现的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of molecular analysis and histopathology for axillary lymph node staging in primary breast cancer: results of the B-CLOSER-I study.

In breast cancer, the number of lymph node metastases is the strongest predictor of outcome. However, histopathology may underestimate the frequency of metastasis. Here we compare automated molecular detection of cytokeratin 19 mRNA by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) with histopathology of single tissue sections for the staging of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer. Axillary lymph nodes were collected from 55 patients with primary breast cancer and sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases. The central 1-mm portion of each node was processed for hematoxylin-eosin staining, and the remaining tissue was analyzed by OSNA. According to OSNA, histopathology misclassified 41.8% of patients as negative for axillary node metastasis (P=0.007). Of the individual nodes considered negative by histopathology, 4.5% contained micrometastases and 2.5% contained macrometastases according to OSNA. Furthermore, 80% of micrometastases identified by histopathology were reclassified as macrometastases by OSNA. Histopathology failed to identify 81.1% of nodes shown to contain metastasis by OSNA. However, OSNA yielded no false-negative results. On the basis of OSNA results, 3 patients were reclassified to a higher pathologic stage. The number of SLN and non-SLN metastases was unrelated according to OSNA (P=0.891). These results show that, compared with molecular detection, histopathology of single tissue sections significantly underestimates the frequency of axillary node metastases. We discuss the implications of these findings in light of current recommendations on the staging of breast cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Molecular Pathology focuses on providing clinical and academic pathologists with coverage of the latest molecular technologies, timely reviews of established techniques, and papers on the applications of these methods to all aspects of surgical pathology and laboratory medicine. It publishes original, peer-reviewed contributions on molecular probes for diagnosis, such as tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and in situ hybridization. Articles demonstrate how these highly sensitive techniques can be applied for more accurate diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信