{"title":"为什么规模越大越有利于控制肿瘤支出:它可能带来较少的竞争,但对循证途径倡议来说可能是一个福音。","authors":"John Carroll","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oncology practices nationwide face rising maintenance costs and lower reimbursements for biologic therapies. It's even tougher for small community-based practices, which often lag in adopting new standards of cancer care. Group purchasing organizations claim they have the market clout that oncologists need, and McKesson is betting that they are right. Will the US Oncology buyout deliver?</p>","PeriodicalId":89534,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology healthcare","volume":"8 1","pages":"17-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3086127/pdf/bth08_1p017.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Bigger Is Better For Controlling Oncology Spend: It offers less competition - perhaps - but can be a boon for evidence-based pathway initiatives.\",\"authors\":\"John Carroll\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Oncology practices nationwide face rising maintenance costs and lower reimbursements for biologic therapies. It's even tougher for small community-based practices, which often lag in adopting new standards of cancer care. Group purchasing organizations claim they have the market clout that oncologists need, and McKesson is betting that they are right. Will the US Oncology buyout deliver?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotechnology healthcare\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"17-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3086127/pdf/bth08_1p017.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotechnology healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Why Bigger Is Better For Controlling Oncology Spend: It offers less competition - perhaps - but can be a boon for evidence-based pathway initiatives.
Oncology practices nationwide face rising maintenance costs and lower reimbursements for biologic therapies. It's even tougher for small community-based practices, which often lag in adopting new standards of cancer care. Group purchasing organizations claim they have the market clout that oncologists need, and McKesson is betting that they are right. Will the US Oncology buyout deliver?