{"title":"为标签外使用生物制剂设定更高的标准:在医生努力寻求最佳治疗的过程中,标签外使用生物制剂很常见。病人想要任何有效的方法。制药商希望扩大标签,但纳税人对缺乏疗效数据感到恼火。这个难题有答案吗?","authors":"Ed Silverman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Off-label use of biologics is common as physicians strive to treat patients as best they can. But payers and purchasers want evidence of value before they pay for off-label use, and the FDA has moved to mitigate off-label prescribing. With patient activism increasing, how should off-label use be handled? And where do the drug makers fit in?</p>","PeriodicalId":89534,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology healthcare","volume":"8 3","pages":"14-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278115/pdf/bh0803014.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Setting the Bar Higher For Off-Label Use of Biologics: Off-label use of biologics is common as physicians strive for optimal treatment. Patients want whatever works. Drug makers want expanded labeling, but payers chafe at the lack of efficacy data. Is there an answer to this conundrum?\",\"authors\":\"Ed Silverman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Off-label use of biologics is common as physicians strive to treat patients as best they can. But payers and purchasers want evidence of value before they pay for off-label use, and the FDA has moved to mitigate off-label prescribing. With patient activism increasing, how should off-label use be handled? And where do the drug makers fit in?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotechnology healthcare\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"14-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278115/pdf/bh0803014.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotechnology healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Setting the Bar Higher For Off-Label Use of Biologics: Off-label use of biologics is common as physicians strive for optimal treatment. Patients want whatever works. Drug makers want expanded labeling, but payers chafe at the lack of efficacy data. Is there an answer to this conundrum?
Off-label use of biologics is common as physicians strive to treat patients as best they can. But payers and purchasers want evidence of value before they pay for off-label use, and the FDA has moved to mitigate off-label prescribing. With patient activism increasing, how should off-label use be handled? And where do the drug makers fit in?