罕见儿童疾病的危险和昂贵的筛查和治疗:克拉伯病的案例

John D. Lantos
{"title":"罕见儿童疾病的危险和昂贵的筛查和治疗:克拉伯病的案例","authors":"John D. Lantos","doi":"10.1002/ddrr.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Public policy surrounding newborn screening is in flux. New technology allows more screening for more diseases at lower cost. Traditional criteria for target diseases have been criticized by leading health policymakers. The example of newborn screening for Krabbe disease highlights many of the dilemmas associated with population-based screening programs. Krabbe is difficult to diagnose, variable in its natural history, and does not always respond to treatment. The only available treatment is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which is expensive, risky, and of uncertain efficacy. This article analyzes the debate about Krabbe as an example of the sorts of debates that will likely arise for many more diseases over the next decade. I conclude that pilot programs in pioneer states should be carefully evaluated before testing for Krabbe is universalized. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2011; 17:15–18.</p>","PeriodicalId":55176,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","volume":"17 1","pages":"15-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ddrr.133","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dangerous and expensive screening and treatment for rare childhood diseases: The case of krabbe disease\",\"authors\":\"John D. Lantos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ddrr.133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Public policy surrounding newborn screening is in flux. New technology allows more screening for more diseases at lower cost. Traditional criteria for target diseases have been criticized by leading health policymakers. The example of newborn screening for Krabbe disease highlights many of the dilemmas associated with population-based screening programs. Krabbe is difficult to diagnose, variable in its natural history, and does not always respond to treatment. The only available treatment is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which is expensive, risky, and of uncertain efficacy. This article analyzes the debate about Krabbe as an example of the sorts of debates that will likely arise for many more diseases over the next decade. I conclude that pilot programs in pioneer states should be carefully evaluated before testing for Krabbe is universalized. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2011; 17:15–18.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"15-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ddrr.133\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ddrr.133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ddrr.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

围绕新生儿筛查的公共政策在不断变化。新技术可以以更低的成本对更多的疾病进行更多的筛查。传统的目标疾病标准受到主要卫生政策制定者的批评。新生儿克拉布氏病筛查的例子突出了与基于人群的筛查计划相关的许多困境。蟹蟹病很难诊断,其自然史多变,治疗并不总是有效。唯一可用的治疗方法是造血干细胞移植,但这种方法昂贵、风险大、疗效不确定。这篇文章分析了关于蟹蟹的争论,作为未来十年可能出现的更多疾病的争论的一个例子。我的结论是,在推广克拉伯病检测之前,应该仔细评估先锋州的试点项目。©2012 Wiley期刊公司Dev disability Res Rev 2011;17:15-18。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dangerous and expensive screening and treatment for rare childhood diseases: The case of krabbe disease

Public policy surrounding newborn screening is in flux. New technology allows more screening for more diseases at lower cost. Traditional criteria for target diseases have been criticized by leading health policymakers. The example of newborn screening for Krabbe disease highlights many of the dilemmas associated with population-based screening programs. Krabbe is difficult to diagnose, variable in its natural history, and does not always respond to treatment. The only available treatment is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which is expensive, risky, and of uncertain efficacy. This article analyzes the debate about Krabbe as an example of the sorts of debates that will likely arise for many more diseases over the next decade. I conclude that pilot programs in pioneer states should be carefully evaluated before testing for Krabbe is universalized. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2011; 17:15–18.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信