局部晚期直肠癌的多脏器切除术:切除远端边缘的适当长度。

Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Pub Date : 2012-02-01 Epub Date: 2012-01-27 DOI:10.4174/jkss.2012.82.2.87
Hyo Kang, Ho Goon Kim, Jae Kyun Ju, Dong Yi Kim
{"title":"局部晚期直肠癌的多脏器切除术:切除远端边缘的适当长度。","authors":"Hyo Kang, Ho Goon Kim, Jae Kyun Ju, Dong Yi Kim","doi":"10.4174/jkss.2012.82.2.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Locally advanced rectal cancer may require an intraoperative decision regarding curative multivisceral resection (MVR) of adjacent organs. In bulky tumor cases, ensuring sufficient distal resection margin (DRM) for achievement of oncologic safety is very difficult. This study is designed to evaluate the adequate length of DRM in multiviscerally resected rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 324 patients who underwent curative low anterior resection for primary pT3-4 rectal cancer between 1995 and 2004 were identified from a prospectively collected colorectal database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Short lengths of DRM (≤1 cm) did not compromise essentially poor oncologic outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer (P = 0.736). However, especially in rectal cancers invading adjacent organs, DRM of less than 2 cm showed poor survival outcome. In 5-year and 10-year survival analysis of MVR, a shorter DRM (<2 cm) showed 41.9% and 30.5%, although a longer DRM (≥2 cm) showed 72.4% and 60.2% (P = 0.03, 0.044). In multivariate analysis of MVR, poorly differentiated histology, ulceroinfiltrative growth of tumor, and short DRM (<2 cm) were significant factors for prediction of poor survival outcome, although short DRM was not significantly related to local and systemic recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In locally advanced rectal cancer of pT3-4, a short length of DRM (≤1 cm) did not compromise essentially poor oncologic outcome. In rectal cancers invading adjacent organs and requiring MVR, a shorter DRM (<2 cm) was found to be related to poor survival outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":49157,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","volume":"82 2","pages":"87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/49/jkss-82-87.PMC3278640.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multivisceral resection for locally advanced rectal cancer: adequate length of distal resection margin.\",\"authors\":\"Hyo Kang, Ho Goon Kim, Jae Kyun Ju, Dong Yi Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4174/jkss.2012.82.2.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Locally advanced rectal cancer may require an intraoperative decision regarding curative multivisceral resection (MVR) of adjacent organs. In bulky tumor cases, ensuring sufficient distal resection margin (DRM) for achievement of oncologic safety is very difficult. This study is designed to evaluate the adequate length of DRM in multiviscerally resected rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 324 patients who underwent curative low anterior resection for primary pT3-4 rectal cancer between 1995 and 2004 were identified from a prospectively collected colorectal database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Short lengths of DRM (≤1 cm) did not compromise essentially poor oncologic outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer (P = 0.736). However, especially in rectal cancers invading adjacent organs, DRM of less than 2 cm showed poor survival outcome. In 5-year and 10-year survival analysis of MVR, a shorter DRM (<2 cm) showed 41.9% and 30.5%, although a longer DRM (≥2 cm) showed 72.4% and 60.2% (P = 0.03, 0.044). In multivariate analysis of MVR, poorly differentiated histology, ulceroinfiltrative growth of tumor, and short DRM (<2 cm) were significant factors for prediction of poor survival outcome, although short DRM was not significantly related to local and systemic recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In locally advanced rectal cancer of pT3-4, a short length of DRM (≤1 cm) did not compromise essentially poor oncologic outcome. In rectal cancers invading adjacent organs and requiring MVR, a shorter DRM (<2 cm) was found to be related to poor survival outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society\",\"volume\":\"82 2\",\"pages\":\"87-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/49/jkss-82-87.PMC3278640.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2012.82.2.87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2012.82.2.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:局部晚期直肠癌可能需要在术中决定是否对邻近器官进行根治性多脏器切除(MVR)。在体积巨大的肿瘤病例中,确保足够的远端切除边缘(DRM)以实现肿瘤学安全是非常困难的。本研究旨在评估多脏器直肠癌切除术中 DRM 的适当长度:方法:从前瞻性收集的结直肠数据库中筛选出 1995 年至 2004 年间接受原发性 pT3-4 直肠癌低位前切除术的 324 例患者:结果:在局部晚期直肠癌中,DRM 长度较短(≤1 厘米)并不影响较差的肿瘤治疗效果(P = 0.736)。然而,特别是在侵犯邻近器官的直肠癌中,小于 2 厘米的 DRM 会导致不良的生存结果。在 MVR 的 5 年和 10 年生存分析中,DRM 越短(结论:DRM 小于 2 cm 的局部晚期直肠癌生存率越高):在 pT3-4 的局部晚期直肠癌中,较短的 DRM(≤1 厘米)并不会影响较差的肿瘤治疗效果。对于侵犯邻近器官并需要进行MVR的直肠癌,较短的DRM(≤1厘米)并不会影响较差的肿瘤预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multivisceral resection for locally advanced rectal cancer: adequate length of distal resection margin.

Multivisceral resection for locally advanced rectal cancer: adequate length of distal resection margin.

Multivisceral resection for locally advanced rectal cancer: adequate length of distal resection margin.

Multivisceral resection for locally advanced rectal cancer: adequate length of distal resection margin.

Purpose: Locally advanced rectal cancer may require an intraoperative decision regarding curative multivisceral resection (MVR) of adjacent organs. In bulky tumor cases, ensuring sufficient distal resection margin (DRM) for achievement of oncologic safety is very difficult. This study is designed to evaluate the adequate length of DRM in multiviscerally resected rectal cancer.

Methods: A total of 324 patients who underwent curative low anterior resection for primary pT3-4 rectal cancer between 1995 and 2004 were identified from a prospectively collected colorectal database.

Results: Short lengths of DRM (≤1 cm) did not compromise essentially poor oncologic outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer (P = 0.736). However, especially in rectal cancers invading adjacent organs, DRM of less than 2 cm showed poor survival outcome. In 5-year and 10-year survival analysis of MVR, a shorter DRM (<2 cm) showed 41.9% and 30.5%, although a longer DRM (≥2 cm) showed 72.4% and 60.2% (P = 0.03, 0.044). In multivariate analysis of MVR, poorly differentiated histology, ulceroinfiltrative growth of tumor, and short DRM (<2 cm) were significant factors for prediction of poor survival outcome, although short DRM was not significantly related to local and systemic recurrence.

Conclusion: In locally advanced rectal cancer of pT3-4, a short length of DRM (≤1 cm) did not compromise essentially poor oncologic outcome. In rectal cancers invading adjacent organs and requiring MVR, a shorter DRM (<2 cm) was found to be related to poor survival outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信