三片二甲双胍缓释片在印度健康男性志愿者体内的生物等效性和药代动力学比较

Arzneimittel-Forschung-Drug Research Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-01-10 DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1295428
L S Batolar, M Iqbal, T Monif, A Khuroo, P L Sharma
{"title":"三片二甲双胍缓释片在印度健康男性志愿者体内的生物等效性和药代动力学比较","authors":"L S Batolar,&nbsp;M Iqbal,&nbsp;T Monif,&nbsp;A Khuroo,&nbsp;P L Sharma","doi":"10.1055/s-0031-1295428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was undertaken to compare the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties of 3 marketed product of metformin (CAS 1115-70-4) extended/sustained release formulation in Indian male volunteers. Study was designed as an open-label, randomized, 3-treatment, single-dose, crossover, bioavailability study comparing 3 marketed brands of 500 mg metformin extended/sustained release tablets in 18 healthy human male volunteers under fed condition. A single oral dose of 500 mg metformin sustained release products, test A (Glycomet SR), test B (Bigomet SR) and extended release reference product was administered as per computer generated randomization schedule during 3 period of the study having 7 days of washout period. A liquid Chromatography mass spectroscopy method for the determination of metformin in human plasma was developed and validated using metformin-D6 as an internal standard. A noncompartment pharmacokinetic method was employed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, Tmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and t½) of metformin using WinNonlin-Node 4.0 software. Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were used to test for bioequivalence after log transformation of plasma data. The predetermined regulatory range of 90% CI for bioequivalence was 0.80 to 1.25. The 90% confidence intervals for log transformed data for Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ for test A vs. reference were 82.11-98.91, 86.29-102.17 and 86.34-102.59 respectively whereas for test B vs. reference were 104.39-125.76, 94.78-112.22 and 92.85-110.33 respectively. The results of this study suggest that the test A was bioequivalent to reference product, whereas test B was not as per regulatory defined criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":56084,"journal":{"name":"Arzneimittel-Forschung-Drug Research","volume":"62 1","pages":"22-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1295428","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic comparison of 3 metformin extended/sustained release tablets in healthy Indian male volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"L S Batolar,&nbsp;M Iqbal,&nbsp;T Monif,&nbsp;A Khuroo,&nbsp;P L Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0031-1295428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was undertaken to compare the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties of 3 marketed product of metformin (CAS 1115-70-4) extended/sustained release formulation in Indian male volunteers. Study was designed as an open-label, randomized, 3-treatment, single-dose, crossover, bioavailability study comparing 3 marketed brands of 500 mg metformin extended/sustained release tablets in 18 healthy human male volunteers under fed condition. A single oral dose of 500 mg metformin sustained release products, test A (Glycomet SR), test B (Bigomet SR) and extended release reference product was administered as per computer generated randomization schedule during 3 period of the study having 7 days of washout period. A liquid Chromatography mass spectroscopy method for the determination of metformin in human plasma was developed and validated using metformin-D6 as an internal standard. A noncompartment pharmacokinetic method was employed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, Tmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and t½) of metformin using WinNonlin-Node 4.0 software. Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were used to test for bioequivalence after log transformation of plasma data. The predetermined regulatory range of 90% CI for bioequivalence was 0.80 to 1.25. The 90% confidence intervals for log transformed data for Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ for test A vs. reference were 82.11-98.91, 86.29-102.17 and 86.34-102.59 respectively whereas for test B vs. reference were 104.39-125.76, 94.78-112.22 and 92.85-110.33 respectively. The results of this study suggest that the test A was bioequivalent to reference product, whereas test B was not as per regulatory defined criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arzneimittel-Forschung-Drug Research\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"22-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1295428\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arzneimittel-Forschung-Drug Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1295428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arzneimittel-Forschung-Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1295428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本研究比较了三种已上市的二甲双胍(CAS 1115-70-4)缓释制剂在印度男性志愿者体内的生物利用度和药代动力学特性。研究设计为一项开放标签、随机、3个治疗、单剂量、交叉、生物利用度研究,比较了3个上市品牌的500 mg二甲双胍缓释片在18名健康男性志愿者的喂养条件下的生物利用度。试验A (Glycomet SR)、试验B (Bigomet SR)和缓释参比产品500 mg单次口服,按照计算机生成的随机化计划进行3期研究,洗脱期为7天。建立了以二甲双胍- d6为内标液相色谱-质谱法测定人血浆中二甲双胍的方法。采用非室室药代动力学方法,利用WinNonlin-Node 4.0软件测定二甲双胍的药代动力学参数(Cmax、Tmax、AUC0-t、AUC0-∞和t½)。利用Cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞对等离子体数据进行对数变换后的生物等效性进行检验。生物等效性90% CI的预定调节范围为0.80 ~ 1.25。测试A相对于参考文献的Cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞对数变换数据的90%置信区间分别为82.11-98.91、86.29-102.17和86.34-102.59,而测试B相对于参考文献的Cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞对数变换数据的90%置信区间分别为104.39-125.76、94.78-112.22和92.85-110.33。本研究结果表明,试验A与参比产品具有生物等效性,而试验B不符合监管规定的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic comparison of 3 metformin extended/sustained release tablets in healthy Indian male volunteers.

This study was undertaken to compare the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties of 3 marketed product of metformin (CAS 1115-70-4) extended/sustained release formulation in Indian male volunteers. Study was designed as an open-label, randomized, 3-treatment, single-dose, crossover, bioavailability study comparing 3 marketed brands of 500 mg metformin extended/sustained release tablets in 18 healthy human male volunteers under fed condition. A single oral dose of 500 mg metformin sustained release products, test A (Glycomet SR), test B (Bigomet SR) and extended release reference product was administered as per computer generated randomization schedule during 3 period of the study having 7 days of washout period. A liquid Chromatography mass spectroscopy method for the determination of metformin in human plasma was developed and validated using metformin-D6 as an internal standard. A noncompartment pharmacokinetic method was employed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, Tmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and t½) of metformin using WinNonlin-Node 4.0 software. Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were used to test for bioequivalence after log transformation of plasma data. The predetermined regulatory range of 90% CI for bioequivalence was 0.80 to 1.25. The 90% confidence intervals for log transformed data for Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ for test A vs. reference were 82.11-98.91, 86.29-102.17 and 86.34-102.59 respectively whereas for test B vs. reference were 104.39-125.76, 94.78-112.22 and 92.85-110.33 respectively. The results of this study suggest that the test A was bioequivalent to reference product, whereas test B was not as per regulatory defined criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信