暴露于x线造影剂后乙酰半胱氨酸对肾功能影响的机制:研究方案。

Euan A Sandilands, Sharon Cameron, Frances Paterson, Sam Donaldson, Lesley Briody, Jane Crowe, Julie Donnelly, Adrian Thompson, Neil R Johnston, Ivor Mackenzie, Neal Uren, Jane Goddard, David J Webb, Ian L Megson, Nicholas Bateman, Michael Eddleston
{"title":"暴露于x线造影剂后乙酰半胱氨酸对肾功能影响的机制:研究方案。","authors":"Euan A Sandilands,&nbsp;Sharon Cameron,&nbsp;Frances Paterson,&nbsp;Sam Donaldson,&nbsp;Lesley Briody,&nbsp;Jane Crowe,&nbsp;Julie Donnelly,&nbsp;Adrian Thompson,&nbsp;Neil R Johnston,&nbsp;Ivor Mackenzie,&nbsp;Neal Uren,&nbsp;Jane Goddard,&nbsp;David J Webb,&nbsp;Ian L Megson,&nbsp;Nicholas Bateman,&nbsp;Michael Eddleston","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-12-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contrast-induced nephropathy is a common complication of contrast administration in patients with chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Its pathophysiology is not well understood; similarly the role of intravenous or oral acetylcysteine is unclear. Randomized controlled trials to date have been conducted without detailed knowledge of the effect of acetylcysteine on renal function. We are conducting a detailed mechanistic study of acetylcysteine on normal and impaired kidneys, both with and without contrast. This information would guide the choice of dose, route, and appropriate outcome measure for future clinical trials in patients with chronic kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>We designed a 4-part study. We have set up randomised controlled cross-over studies to assess the effect of intravenous (50 mg/kg/hr for 2 hrs before contrast exposure, then 20 mg/kg/hr for 5 hrs) or oral acetylcysteine (1200 mg twice daily for 2 days, starting the day before contrast exposure) on renal function in normal and diseased kidneys, and normal kidneys exposed to contrast. We have also set up a parallel-group randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of intravenous or oral acetylcysteine on patients with chronic kidney disease stage III undergoing elective coronary angiography. The primary outcome is change in renal blood flow; secondary outcomes include change in glomerular filtration rate, tubular function, urinary proteins, and oxidative balance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Contrast-induced nephropathy represents a significant source of hospital morbidity and mortality. Over the last ten years, acetylcysteine has been administered prior to contrast to reduce the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Randomized controlled trials, however, have not reliably demonstrated renoprotection; a recent large randomized controlled trial assessing a dose of oral acetylcysteine selected without mechanistic insight did not reduce the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy. Our study should reveal the mechanism of effect of acetylcysteine on renal function and identify an appropriate route for future dose response studies and in time randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trials.gov: NCT00558142; EudraCT: 2006-003509-18.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"12 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-12-3","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanisms for an effect of acetylcysteine on renal function after exposure to radio-graphic contrast material: study protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Euan A Sandilands,&nbsp;Sharon Cameron,&nbsp;Frances Paterson,&nbsp;Sam Donaldson,&nbsp;Lesley Briody,&nbsp;Jane Crowe,&nbsp;Julie Donnelly,&nbsp;Adrian Thompson,&nbsp;Neil R Johnston,&nbsp;Ivor Mackenzie,&nbsp;Neal Uren,&nbsp;Jane Goddard,&nbsp;David J Webb,&nbsp;Ian L Megson,&nbsp;Nicholas Bateman,&nbsp;Michael Eddleston\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1472-6904-12-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contrast-induced nephropathy is a common complication of contrast administration in patients with chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Its pathophysiology is not well understood; similarly the role of intravenous or oral acetylcysteine is unclear. Randomized controlled trials to date have been conducted without detailed knowledge of the effect of acetylcysteine on renal function. We are conducting a detailed mechanistic study of acetylcysteine on normal and impaired kidneys, both with and without contrast. This information would guide the choice of dose, route, and appropriate outcome measure for future clinical trials in patients with chronic kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>We designed a 4-part study. We have set up randomised controlled cross-over studies to assess the effect of intravenous (50 mg/kg/hr for 2 hrs before contrast exposure, then 20 mg/kg/hr for 5 hrs) or oral acetylcysteine (1200 mg twice daily for 2 days, starting the day before contrast exposure) on renal function in normal and diseased kidneys, and normal kidneys exposed to contrast. We have also set up a parallel-group randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of intravenous or oral acetylcysteine on patients with chronic kidney disease stage III undergoing elective coronary angiography. The primary outcome is change in renal blood flow; secondary outcomes include change in glomerular filtration rate, tubular function, urinary proteins, and oxidative balance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Contrast-induced nephropathy represents a significant source of hospital morbidity and mortality. Over the last ten years, acetylcysteine has been administered prior to contrast to reduce the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Randomized controlled trials, however, have not reliably demonstrated renoprotection; a recent large randomized controlled trial assessing a dose of oral acetylcysteine selected without mechanistic insight did not reduce the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy. Our study should reveal the mechanism of effect of acetylcysteine on renal function and identify an appropriate route for future dose response studies and in time randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trials.gov: NCT00558142; EudraCT: 2006-003509-18.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-12-3\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-12-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-12-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

背景:造影剂肾病是慢性肾病和糖尿病患者使用造影剂后常见的并发症。其病理生理机制尚不清楚;同样,静脉注射或口服乙酰半胱氨酸的作用尚不清楚。迄今为止进行的随机对照试验没有详细了解乙酰半胱氨酸对肾功能的影响。我们正在进行一项详细的机制研究乙酰半胱氨酸对正常和受损肾脏的作用,包括有和没有对比。这些信息将指导未来慢性肾脏疾病患者临床试验中剂量、途径和适当结果测量的选择。方法/设计:我们设计了一个四部分的研究。我们已经建立了随机对照交叉研究,以评估静脉注射(50mg /kg/小时,对比剂暴露前2小时,然后20mg /kg/小时,持续5小时)或口服乙酰半胱氨酸(1200mg,每天两次,持续2天,从对比剂暴露前一天开始)对正常肾脏和病变肾脏以及暴露于对比剂的正常肾脏肾功能的影响。我们还建立了一项平行组随机对照试验,以评估静脉注射或口服乙酰半胱氨酸对接受选择性冠状动脉造影的慢性肾脏疾病III期患者的影响。主要结局是肾血流量的改变;次要结局包括肾小球滤过率、肾小管功能、尿蛋白和氧化平衡的改变。讨论:造影剂肾病是医院发病率和死亡率的重要来源。在过去的十年中,乙酰半胱氨酸在造影剂之前使用,以降低造影剂肾病的风险。然而,随机对照试验并没有可靠地证明肾保护作用;最近的一项大型随机对照试验评估了口服乙酰半胱氨酸的剂量,但没有深入了解其机制,并没有降低造影剂肾病的发生率。我们的研究应该揭示乙酰半胱氨酸对肾功能影响的机制,并为未来的剂量反应研究和及时的随机对照试验确定合适的途径。试验注册:Clinical Trials.gov: NCT00558142;EudraCT: 2006-003509-18。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mechanisms for an effect of acetylcysteine on renal function after exposure to radio-graphic contrast material: study protocol.

Mechanisms for an effect of acetylcysteine on renal function after exposure to radio-graphic contrast material: study protocol.

Mechanisms for an effect of acetylcysteine on renal function after exposure to radio-graphic contrast material: study protocol.

Background: Contrast-induced nephropathy is a common complication of contrast administration in patients with chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Its pathophysiology is not well understood; similarly the role of intravenous or oral acetylcysteine is unclear. Randomized controlled trials to date have been conducted without detailed knowledge of the effect of acetylcysteine on renal function. We are conducting a detailed mechanistic study of acetylcysteine on normal and impaired kidneys, both with and without contrast. This information would guide the choice of dose, route, and appropriate outcome measure for future clinical trials in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Methods/design: We designed a 4-part study. We have set up randomised controlled cross-over studies to assess the effect of intravenous (50 mg/kg/hr for 2 hrs before contrast exposure, then 20 mg/kg/hr for 5 hrs) or oral acetylcysteine (1200 mg twice daily for 2 days, starting the day before contrast exposure) on renal function in normal and diseased kidneys, and normal kidneys exposed to contrast. We have also set up a parallel-group randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of intravenous or oral acetylcysteine on patients with chronic kidney disease stage III undergoing elective coronary angiography. The primary outcome is change in renal blood flow; secondary outcomes include change in glomerular filtration rate, tubular function, urinary proteins, and oxidative balance.

Discussion: Contrast-induced nephropathy represents a significant source of hospital morbidity and mortality. Over the last ten years, acetylcysteine has been administered prior to contrast to reduce the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Randomized controlled trials, however, have not reliably demonstrated renoprotection; a recent large randomized controlled trial assessing a dose of oral acetylcysteine selected without mechanistic insight did not reduce the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy. Our study should reveal the mechanism of effect of acetylcysteine on renal function and identify an appropriate route for future dose response studies and in time randomized controlled trials.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT00558142; EudraCT: 2006-003509-18.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信