用生物力学的方法来理解体操式撞击着地的潜在伤害。

Marianne Gittoes, Gareth Irwin
{"title":"用生物力学的方法来理解体操式撞击着地的潜在伤害。","authors":"Marianne Gittoes,&nbsp;Gareth Irwin","doi":"10.1186/1758-2555-4-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p> Gymnasts are exposed to a high incidence of impact landings due to the execution of repeated dismount performances. Biomechanical research can help inform recent discussions surrounding a proposed rule change in potentially injurious gymnastic dismounting. The review examines existing understanding of the mechanisms influencing the impact loads incurred in gymnastic-style landings achieved using biomechanical approaches. Laboratory-based and theoretical modelling research of inherent and regulatory mechanisms is appraised. The integration of the existing insights into injury prevention interventions studies is further considered in the appraisals. While laboratory-based studies have traditionally been favoured, the difficulty in controlling and isolating mechanisms of interest has partially restricted the understanding gained. An increase in the use of theoretical approaches has been evident over the past two decades, which has successfully enhanced insight into less readily modified mechanisms. For example, the important contribution of mass compositions and 'tuned' mass coupling responses to impact loading has been evidenced. While theoretical studies have advanced knowledge in impact landing mechanics, restrictions in the availability of laboratory-based input data have suppressed the benefits gained. The advantages of integrating laboratory-based and theoretical approaches in furthering scientific understanding of loading mechanisms have been recognised in the literature. Since a multi-mechanism contribution to impact loading has been evident, a deviation away from studies examining isolated mechanisms may be supported for the future. A further scientific understanding of the use of regulatory mechanisms in alleviating a performer's inherent injury predisposition may subsequently be gained and used to inform potential rule changes in gymnastics. While the use of controlled studies for providing scientific evidence for the effectiveness of gymnastics injury counter measures has been advocated over the past decade, a lack of information based on randomised controlled studies or actual evaluation of counter measures in the field setting has been highlighted. The subsequent integration of insight into biomechanical risk factors of landing with clinical practice interventions has been recently advocated.</p>","PeriodicalId":88316,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT","volume":"4 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-2555-4-4","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical approaches to understanding the potentially injurious demands of gymnastic-style impact landings.\",\"authors\":\"Marianne Gittoes,&nbsp;Gareth Irwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1758-2555-4-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p> Gymnasts are exposed to a high incidence of impact landings due to the execution of repeated dismount performances. Biomechanical research can help inform recent discussions surrounding a proposed rule change in potentially injurious gymnastic dismounting. The review examines existing understanding of the mechanisms influencing the impact loads incurred in gymnastic-style landings achieved using biomechanical approaches. Laboratory-based and theoretical modelling research of inherent and regulatory mechanisms is appraised. The integration of the existing insights into injury prevention interventions studies is further considered in the appraisals. While laboratory-based studies have traditionally been favoured, the difficulty in controlling and isolating mechanisms of interest has partially restricted the understanding gained. An increase in the use of theoretical approaches has been evident over the past two decades, which has successfully enhanced insight into less readily modified mechanisms. For example, the important contribution of mass compositions and 'tuned' mass coupling responses to impact loading has been evidenced. While theoretical studies have advanced knowledge in impact landing mechanics, restrictions in the availability of laboratory-based input data have suppressed the benefits gained. The advantages of integrating laboratory-based and theoretical approaches in furthering scientific understanding of loading mechanisms have been recognised in the literature. Since a multi-mechanism contribution to impact loading has been evident, a deviation away from studies examining isolated mechanisms may be supported for the future. A further scientific understanding of the use of regulatory mechanisms in alleviating a performer's inherent injury predisposition may subsequently be gained and used to inform potential rule changes in gymnastics. While the use of controlled studies for providing scientific evidence for the effectiveness of gymnastics injury counter measures has been advocated over the past decade, a lack of information based on randomised controlled studies or actual evaluation of counter measures in the field setting has been highlighted. The subsequent integration of insight into biomechanical risk factors of landing with clinical practice interventions has been recently advocated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-2555-4-4\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-4-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-4-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

体操运动员由于反复的下马动作,很容易发生撞击着地。生物力学研究可以帮助告知最近围绕潜在伤害的体操下马拟议规则变化的讨论。这篇综述考察了现有的对使用生物力学方法实现体操式着陆时产生的冲击载荷影响机制的理解。基于实验室和理论建模研究的内在和调节机制进行了评价。在评估中进一步考虑了对伤害预防干预研究的现有见解的整合。虽然以实验室为基础的研究传统上受到青睐,但在控制和分离感兴趣的机制方面的困难部分限制了所获得的理解。在过去的二十年中,理论方法的使用明显增加,这已经成功地增强了对不易修改的机制的洞察力。例如,质量组成和“调谐”质量耦合响应对冲击载荷的重要贡献已得到证明。虽然理论研究在撞击着陆力学方面具有先进的知识,但基于实验室输入数据的可用性的限制抑制了所获得的好处。整合基于实验室和理论的方法在进一步科学理解加载机制方面的优势已经在文献中得到认可。由于对冲击载荷的多机制贡献已经很明显,因此将来可能会支持偏离对孤立机制的研究。对使用调节机制来减轻运动员固有的损伤倾向的进一步科学理解可能随后会得到,并用于告知潜在的体操规则变化。虽然在过去的十年中一直提倡使用对照研究来为体操损伤对抗措施的有效性提供科学证据,但缺乏基于随机对照研究或在现场设置对抗措施的实际评估的信息已被强调。最近,人们提倡将着陆的生物力学危险因素与临床实践干预措施结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanical approaches to understanding the potentially injurious demands of gymnastic-style impact landings.

Gymnasts are exposed to a high incidence of impact landings due to the execution of repeated dismount performances. Biomechanical research can help inform recent discussions surrounding a proposed rule change in potentially injurious gymnastic dismounting. The review examines existing understanding of the mechanisms influencing the impact loads incurred in gymnastic-style landings achieved using biomechanical approaches. Laboratory-based and theoretical modelling research of inherent and regulatory mechanisms is appraised. The integration of the existing insights into injury prevention interventions studies is further considered in the appraisals. While laboratory-based studies have traditionally been favoured, the difficulty in controlling and isolating mechanisms of interest has partially restricted the understanding gained. An increase in the use of theoretical approaches has been evident over the past two decades, which has successfully enhanced insight into less readily modified mechanisms. For example, the important contribution of mass compositions and 'tuned' mass coupling responses to impact loading has been evidenced. While theoretical studies have advanced knowledge in impact landing mechanics, restrictions in the availability of laboratory-based input data have suppressed the benefits gained. The advantages of integrating laboratory-based and theoretical approaches in furthering scientific understanding of loading mechanisms have been recognised in the literature. Since a multi-mechanism contribution to impact loading has been evident, a deviation away from studies examining isolated mechanisms may be supported for the future. A further scientific understanding of the use of regulatory mechanisms in alleviating a performer's inherent injury predisposition may subsequently be gained and used to inform potential rule changes in gymnastics. While the use of controlled studies for providing scientific evidence for the effectiveness of gymnastics injury counter measures has been advocated over the past decade, a lack of information based on randomised controlled studies or actual evaluation of counter measures in the field setting has been highlighted. The subsequent integration of insight into biomechanical risk factors of landing with clinical practice interventions has been recently advocated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信