用氘化内标(包括MPA)测定5种免疫抑制剂的LC-MS/MS方法的验证。

Armin Buchwald, Karl Winkler, Thomas Epting
{"title":"用氘化内标(包括MPA)测定5种免疫抑制剂的LC-MS/MS方法的验证。","authors":"Armin Buchwald,&nbsp;Karl Winkler,&nbsp;Thomas Epting","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-12-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs in organ-transplanted patients is crucial to prevent intoxication or transplant rejection due to inadequate dosage. The commonly used immunoassays have been gradually undergoing replacement by mass spectrometry, since this physical method offers both a higher sensitivity and specificity. However, a switch should be carefully considered because it is a challenging procedure and needs to be thoroughly validated. From an economic perspective it is reasonable to include mycophenolic acid into the assay, because this saves the necessity for an additional measurement. However, to date very few validation protocols for the measurement of immunosuppressants, including mycophenolic acid, are available. In order to adequately compensate for matrix effects, the use of stable isotope labeled internal standards is advisable. Here, the authors describe a single method suitable for the quantification of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus and mycophenolic acid, based on deuterated internal standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plasma proteins were precipitated with zinc-sulfate, followed by an online solid phase extraction in the flow-through direction. Chromatographic separation was performed by a c18-phenyl-hexyl column. For subsequent mass spectrometric analysis stable-isotope-labeled internal standards were used. Results were available after 3.5 minutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low quantification limits (accuracy: 104 - 118%) and linearity resulted in 2 -1250 ng/ml for cyclosporine A; 0.5 - 42.2 ng/ml for tacrolimus; 0.6 - 49.2 ng/ml for sirolimus; 0.5 - 40.8 ng/ml for everolimus and 0.01 - 7.5 μg/ml for mycophenolic acid. Intra-assay precision revealed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.9 - 14.7%, with an accuracy of 89 - 138%. The CV of inter-assay precision was 2.5 - 12.5%, with an accuracy of 90 - 113%. Recovery ranged from 76.6 to 84%. Matrix effects were well compensated by deuterated internal standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors present a fast, economical and robust method for routine therapeutic drug monitoring comprising five immunosuppressants including mycophenolic acid.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"12 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-12-2","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of an LC-MS/MS method to determine five immunosuppressants with deuterated internal standards including MPA.\",\"authors\":\"Armin Buchwald,&nbsp;Karl Winkler,&nbsp;Thomas Epting\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1472-6904-12-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs in organ-transplanted patients is crucial to prevent intoxication or transplant rejection due to inadequate dosage. The commonly used immunoassays have been gradually undergoing replacement by mass spectrometry, since this physical method offers both a higher sensitivity and specificity. However, a switch should be carefully considered because it is a challenging procedure and needs to be thoroughly validated. From an economic perspective it is reasonable to include mycophenolic acid into the assay, because this saves the necessity for an additional measurement. However, to date very few validation protocols for the measurement of immunosuppressants, including mycophenolic acid, are available. In order to adequately compensate for matrix effects, the use of stable isotope labeled internal standards is advisable. Here, the authors describe a single method suitable for the quantification of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus and mycophenolic acid, based on deuterated internal standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plasma proteins were precipitated with zinc-sulfate, followed by an online solid phase extraction in the flow-through direction. Chromatographic separation was performed by a c18-phenyl-hexyl column. For subsequent mass spectrometric analysis stable-isotope-labeled internal standards were used. Results were available after 3.5 minutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low quantification limits (accuracy: 104 - 118%) and linearity resulted in 2 -1250 ng/ml for cyclosporine A; 0.5 - 42.2 ng/ml for tacrolimus; 0.6 - 49.2 ng/ml for sirolimus; 0.5 - 40.8 ng/ml for everolimus and 0.01 - 7.5 μg/ml for mycophenolic acid. Intra-assay precision revealed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.9 - 14.7%, with an accuracy of 89 - 138%. The CV of inter-assay precision was 2.5 - 12.5%, with an accuracy of 90 - 113%. Recovery ranged from 76.6 to 84%. Matrix effects were well compensated by deuterated internal standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors present a fast, economical and robust method for routine therapeutic drug monitoring comprising five immunosuppressants including mycophenolic acid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-12-2\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-12-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-12-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

摘要

背景:在器官移植患者中监测免疫抑制药物的治疗药物对防止因剂量不足引起的中毒或移植排斥反应至关重要。常用的免疫测定法已逐渐被质谱法所取代,因为这种物理方法具有更高的灵敏度和特异性。但是,应该仔细考虑切换,因为这是一个具有挑战性的过程,需要彻底验证。从经济角度来看,将霉酚酸纳入分析是合理的,因为这节省了额外测量的必要性。然而,迄今为止,用于免疫抑制剂(包括霉酚酸)测量的验证方案很少。为了充分补偿基质效应,建议使用稳定同位素标记的内标。本文介绍了一种基于氘化内标的环孢素a、他克莫司、西罗莫司、依维莫司和霉酚酸的定量方法。方法:血浆蛋白用硫酸锌沉淀,然后在流动方向进行在线固相萃取。采用c18-苯基-己基柱进行色谱分离。随后的质谱分析使用稳定同位素标记的内标。3.5分钟后可得到结果。结果:环孢素A的定量限低(准确度为104 ~ 118%),线性良好,为2 ~ 1250 ng/ml;他克莫司0.5 ~ 42.2 ng/ml;西罗莫司0.6 ~ 49.2 ng/ml;依维莫司0.5 ~ 40.8 ng/ml,霉酚酸0.01 ~ 7.5 ng/ml。测定内精密度变异系数(CV)为0.9 ~ 14.7%,准确度为89 ~ 138%。测定间精密度的变异系数为2.5 ~ 12.5%,准确度为90 ~ 113%。回收率从76.6到84%不等。氘化内标能很好地补偿基质效应。结论:本文提出了一种由霉酚酸等5种免疫抑制剂组成的快速、经济、可靠的常规治疗药物监测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of an LC-MS/MS method to determine five immunosuppressants with deuterated internal standards including MPA.

Validation of an LC-MS/MS method to determine five immunosuppressants with deuterated internal standards including MPA.

Validation of an LC-MS/MS method to determine five immunosuppressants with deuterated internal standards including MPA.

Validation of an LC-MS/MS method to determine five immunosuppressants with deuterated internal standards including MPA.

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs in organ-transplanted patients is crucial to prevent intoxication or transplant rejection due to inadequate dosage. The commonly used immunoassays have been gradually undergoing replacement by mass spectrometry, since this physical method offers both a higher sensitivity and specificity. However, a switch should be carefully considered because it is a challenging procedure and needs to be thoroughly validated. From an economic perspective it is reasonable to include mycophenolic acid into the assay, because this saves the necessity for an additional measurement. However, to date very few validation protocols for the measurement of immunosuppressants, including mycophenolic acid, are available. In order to adequately compensate for matrix effects, the use of stable isotope labeled internal standards is advisable. Here, the authors describe a single method suitable for the quantification of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus and mycophenolic acid, based on deuterated internal standards.

Methods: Plasma proteins were precipitated with zinc-sulfate, followed by an online solid phase extraction in the flow-through direction. Chromatographic separation was performed by a c18-phenyl-hexyl column. For subsequent mass spectrometric analysis stable-isotope-labeled internal standards were used. Results were available after 3.5 minutes.

Results: Low quantification limits (accuracy: 104 - 118%) and linearity resulted in 2 -1250 ng/ml for cyclosporine A; 0.5 - 42.2 ng/ml for tacrolimus; 0.6 - 49.2 ng/ml for sirolimus; 0.5 - 40.8 ng/ml for everolimus and 0.01 - 7.5 μg/ml for mycophenolic acid. Intra-assay precision revealed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.9 - 14.7%, with an accuracy of 89 - 138%. The CV of inter-assay precision was 2.5 - 12.5%, with an accuracy of 90 - 113%. Recovery ranged from 76.6 to 84%. Matrix effects were well compensated by deuterated internal standards.

Conclusions: The authors present a fast, economical and robust method for routine therapeutic drug monitoring comprising five immunosuppressants including mycophenolic acid.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信