受伤患者现场分诊指南:国家现场分诊专家小组的建议,2011年。

IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Mmwr Recommendations and Reports Pub Date : 2012-01-13
Scott M Sasser, Richard C Hunt, Mark Faul, David Sugerman, William S Pearson, Theresa Dulski, Marlena M Wald, Gregory J Jurkovich, Craig D Newgard, E Brooke Lerner
{"title":"受伤患者现场分诊指南:国家现场分诊专家小组的建议,2011年。","authors":"Scott M Sasser,&nbsp;Richard C Hunt,&nbsp;Mark Faul,&nbsp;David Sugerman,&nbsp;William S Pearson,&nbsp;Theresa Dulski,&nbsp;Marlena M Wald,&nbsp;Gregory J Jurkovich,&nbsp;Craig D Newgard,&nbsp;E Brooke Lerner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United States, injury is the leading cause of death for persons aged 1-44 years. In 2008, approximately 30 million injuries were serious enough to require the injured person to visit a hospital emergency department (ED); 5.4 million (18%) of these injured patients were transported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). On arrival at the scene of an injury, the EMS provider must determine the severity of injury, initiate management of the patient's injuries, and decide the most appropriate destination hospital for the individual patient. These destination decisions are made through a process known as \"field triage,\" which involves an assessment not only of the physiology and anatomy of injury but also of the mechanism of the injury and special patient and system considerations. Since 1986, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) has provided guidance for the field triage process through its \"Field Triage Decision Scheme.\" This guidance was updated with each version of the decision scheme (published in 1986, 1990, 1993, and 1999). In 2005, CDC, with financial support from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, collaborated with ACS-COT to convene the initial meetings of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage (the Panel) to revise the decision scheme; the revised version was published in 2006 by ACS-COT (American College of Surgeons. Resources for the optimal care of the injured patient: 2006. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2006). In 2009, CDC published a detailed description of the scientific rationale for revising the field triage criteria (CDC. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage. MMWR 2009;58[No. RR-1]). In 2011, CDC reconvened the Panel to review the 2006 Guidelines in the context of recently published literature, assess the experiences of states and local communities working to implement the Guidelines, and recommend any needed changes or modifications to the Guidelines. This report describes the dissemination and impact of the 2006 Guidelines; outlines the methodology used by the Panel for its 2011 review; explains the revisions and modifications to the physiologic, anatomic, mechanism-of-injury, and special considerations criteria; updates the schematic of the 2006 Guidelines; and provides the rationale used by the Panel for these changes. This report is intended to help prehospital-care providers in their daily duties recognize individual injured patients who are most likely to benefit from specialized trauma center resources and is not intended as a mass casualty or disaster triage tool. The Panel anticipates a review of these Guidelines approximately every 5 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":33.7000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011.\",\"authors\":\"Scott M Sasser,&nbsp;Richard C Hunt,&nbsp;Mark Faul,&nbsp;David Sugerman,&nbsp;William S Pearson,&nbsp;Theresa Dulski,&nbsp;Marlena M Wald,&nbsp;Gregory J Jurkovich,&nbsp;Craig D Newgard,&nbsp;E Brooke Lerner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the United States, injury is the leading cause of death for persons aged 1-44 years. In 2008, approximately 30 million injuries were serious enough to require the injured person to visit a hospital emergency department (ED); 5.4 million (18%) of these injured patients were transported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). On arrival at the scene of an injury, the EMS provider must determine the severity of injury, initiate management of the patient's injuries, and decide the most appropriate destination hospital for the individual patient. These destination decisions are made through a process known as \\\"field triage,\\\" which involves an assessment not only of the physiology and anatomy of injury but also of the mechanism of the injury and special patient and system considerations. Since 1986, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) has provided guidance for the field triage process through its \\\"Field Triage Decision Scheme.\\\" This guidance was updated with each version of the decision scheme (published in 1986, 1990, 1993, and 1999). In 2005, CDC, with financial support from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, collaborated with ACS-COT to convene the initial meetings of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage (the Panel) to revise the decision scheme; the revised version was published in 2006 by ACS-COT (American College of Surgeons. Resources for the optimal care of the injured patient: 2006. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2006). In 2009, CDC published a detailed description of the scientific rationale for revising the field triage criteria (CDC. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage. MMWR 2009;58[No. RR-1]). In 2011, CDC reconvened the Panel to review the 2006 Guidelines in the context of recently published literature, assess the experiences of states and local communities working to implement the Guidelines, and recommend any needed changes or modifications to the Guidelines. This report describes the dissemination and impact of the 2006 Guidelines; outlines the methodology used by the Panel for its 2011 review; explains the revisions and modifications to the physiologic, anatomic, mechanism-of-injury, and special considerations criteria; updates the schematic of the 2006 Guidelines; and provides the rationale used by the Panel for these changes. This report is intended to help prehospital-care providers in their daily duties recognize individual injured patients who are most likely to benefit from specialized trauma center resources and is not intended as a mass casualty or disaster triage tool. The Panel anticipates a review of these Guidelines approximately every 5 years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":33.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,伤害是1-44岁人群死亡的主要原因。2008年,大约有3000万起伤害严重到需要伤者去医院急诊室(ED);其中540万(18%)受伤患者由紧急医疗服务(EMS)运送。到达受伤现场后,EMS提供者必须确定受伤的严重程度,开始对患者的伤害进行管理,并为个体患者决定最合适的目的地医院。这些目的地的决定是通过一个被称为“现场分诊”的过程做出的,这不仅包括对损伤的生理学和解剖学的评估,还包括损伤的机制和特殊的患者和系统考虑。自1986年以来,美国外科医师学会创伤委员会(ACS-COT)通过其“现场分诊决定方案”为现场分诊过程提供指导。该指南随着决策方案的每个版本(分别于1986年、1990年、1993年和1999年出版)而更新。2005年,疾病预防控制中心在国家公路交通安全管理局的财政支持下,与ACS-COT合作召开了国家现场分诊专家小组(小组)的首次会议,以修订决策方案;修订版于2006年由ACS-COT(美国外科医师学会)出版。为伤员提供最佳护理的资源:2006年。芝加哥,伊利诺斯州:美国外科医师学会;2006)。2009年,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)发表了一份关于修订现场分类标准的科学依据的详细描述。受伤病人现场分诊指南:国家现场分诊专家小组的建议。(没有MMWR 2009; 58。RR-1])。2011年,疾病控制与预防中心再次召集该小组,在最近发表的文献的背景下审查2006年指南,评估各州和地方社区努力实施指南的经验,并建议对指南进行任何必要的修改或修改。本报告描述了2006年指南的传播和影响;概述了小组2011年审查所使用的方法;解释对生理学、解剖学、损伤机制和特殊考虑标准的修订和修改;更新2006年指南的概要;并提供小组作出这些改变的理由。本报告旨在帮助院前护理提供者在日常工作中识别最有可能从专门的创伤中心资源中受益的个别受伤患者,而不是作为大规模伤亡或灾难分诊工具。小组预计大约每5年对这些准则进行一次审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011.

In the United States, injury is the leading cause of death for persons aged 1-44 years. In 2008, approximately 30 million injuries were serious enough to require the injured person to visit a hospital emergency department (ED); 5.4 million (18%) of these injured patients were transported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). On arrival at the scene of an injury, the EMS provider must determine the severity of injury, initiate management of the patient's injuries, and decide the most appropriate destination hospital for the individual patient. These destination decisions are made through a process known as "field triage," which involves an assessment not only of the physiology and anatomy of injury but also of the mechanism of the injury and special patient and system considerations. Since 1986, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) has provided guidance for the field triage process through its "Field Triage Decision Scheme." This guidance was updated with each version of the decision scheme (published in 1986, 1990, 1993, and 1999). In 2005, CDC, with financial support from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, collaborated with ACS-COT to convene the initial meetings of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage (the Panel) to revise the decision scheme; the revised version was published in 2006 by ACS-COT (American College of Surgeons. Resources for the optimal care of the injured patient: 2006. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2006). In 2009, CDC published a detailed description of the scientific rationale for revising the field triage criteria (CDC. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage. MMWR 2009;58[No. RR-1]). In 2011, CDC reconvened the Panel to review the 2006 Guidelines in the context of recently published literature, assess the experiences of states and local communities working to implement the Guidelines, and recommend any needed changes or modifications to the Guidelines. This report describes the dissemination and impact of the 2006 Guidelines; outlines the methodology used by the Panel for its 2011 review; explains the revisions and modifications to the physiologic, anatomic, mechanism-of-injury, and special considerations criteria; updates the schematic of the 2006 Guidelines; and provides the rationale used by the Panel for these changes. This report is intended to help prehospital-care providers in their daily duties recognize individual injured patients who are most likely to benefit from specialized trauma center resources and is not intended as a mass casualty or disaster triage tool. The Panel anticipates a review of these Guidelines approximately every 5 years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mmwr Recommendations and Reports
Mmwr Recommendations and Reports PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The MMWR series of publications is published by the Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. The MMWR Recommendations and Reports contain in-depth articles that relay policy statements for prevention and treatment in all areas in the CDC’s scope of responsibility (e.g., recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信