太平洋地区癌症联盟评估:地区联盟内部和外部评估的结果和影响。

Hawaii medical journal Pub Date : 2011-11-01
Angela U Sy, Karen A Heckert, Lee Buenconsejo-Lum, Johnny Hedson, Suresh Tamang, Neal Palafox
{"title":"太平洋地区癌症联盟评估:地区联盟内部和外部评估的结果和影响。","authors":"Angela U Sy, Karen A Heckert, Lee Buenconsejo-Lum, Johnny Hedson, Suresh Tamang, Neal Palafox","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>The Pacific Regional Cancer Coalition (PRCC) provides regional leadership in the U.S. Affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) to implement the Regional Comprehensive Control Plan: 2007-2012, and to evaluate its coalition and partnerships. The Pacific Center of Excellence in the Elimination of Disparities (CEED), aims to reduce cancer disparities and conducts evaluation activities relevant to cancer prevention and control in the USAPI.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The PRCC Self (internal) and Partner (external) Assessments were conducted to assess coalition functioning, regional and national partnerships, sustainability, and the role of regionalism for integrating all chronic disease prevention and control in the Pacific.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Self-administered questionnaires and key informant telephone interviews with PRCC members (N=20), and representatives from regional and national partner organizations were administered (N=26). Validated multi item measures using 5-point scales on coalition and partnership characteristics were used. Chronbach's alphas and averages for the measures were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal coalition measures: satisfaction (4.2, SD=0.48) communication (4.0, SD=0.56), respect (4.0, SD=0.60) were rated more highly than external partnership measures: resource sharing (3.5, SD=0.74), regionalism (3.9, SD=0.47), use of findings (3.9, SD=0.50). The PRCC specifically identified its level of \"collaboration\" with external partners including Pacific CEED. External partners identified its partnership with the PRCC in the \"coalition\" stage.</p><p><strong>Principal conclusions: </strong>PRCC members and external partners are satisfied with their partnerships. All groups should continue to focus on building collaboration with partners to reflect a truly regional approach to sustain the commitment, the coalitions and the programming to reduce cancer in the USAPI. PRCC and partners should also work together to integrate all chronic disease prevention and control efforts in the Pacific.</p>","PeriodicalId":12824,"journal":{"name":"Hawaii medical journal","volume":" ","pages":"47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3254227/pdf/hmj7011_suppl2_0047.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of the Pacific Regional Cancer Coalition: outcomes and implications of a regional coalition internal and external assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Angela U Sy, Karen A Heckert, Lee Buenconsejo-Lum, Johnny Hedson, Suresh Tamang, Neal Palafox\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>The Pacific Regional Cancer Coalition (PRCC) provides regional leadership in the U.S. Affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) to implement the Regional Comprehensive Control Plan: 2007-2012, and to evaluate its coalition and partnerships. The Pacific Center of Excellence in the Elimination of Disparities (CEED), aims to reduce cancer disparities and conducts evaluation activities relevant to cancer prevention and control in the USAPI.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The PRCC Self (internal) and Partner (external) Assessments were conducted to assess coalition functioning, regional and national partnerships, sustainability, and the role of regionalism for integrating all chronic disease prevention and control in the Pacific.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Self-administered questionnaires and key informant telephone interviews with PRCC members (N=20), and representatives from regional and national partner organizations were administered (N=26). Validated multi item measures using 5-point scales on coalition and partnership characteristics were used. Chronbach's alphas and averages for the measures were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal coalition measures: satisfaction (4.2, SD=0.48) communication (4.0, SD=0.56), respect (4.0, SD=0.60) were rated more highly than external partnership measures: resource sharing (3.5, SD=0.74), regionalism (3.9, SD=0.47), use of findings (3.9, SD=0.50). The PRCC specifically identified its level of \\\"collaboration\\\" with external partners including Pacific CEED. External partners identified its partnership with the PRCC in the \\\"coalition\\\" stage.</p><p><strong>Principal conclusions: </strong>PRCC members and external partners are satisfied with their partnerships. All groups should continue to focus on building collaboration with partners to reflect a truly regional approach to sustain the commitment, the coalitions and the programming to reduce cancer in the USAPI. PRCC and partners should also work together to integrate all chronic disease prevention and control efforts in the Pacific.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hawaii medical journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"47-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3254227/pdf/hmj7011_suppl2_0047.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hawaii medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hawaii medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意义重大:太平洋地区癌症联盟 (PRCC) 在美国太平洋附属岛屿 (USAPI) 发挥地区领导作用,实施地区综合控制计划:2007-2012 年,并对其联盟和合作伙伴关系进行评估。太平洋消除差异卓越中心(CEED)旨在减少癌症差异,并开展与美属太平洋岛屿癌症预防和控制相关的评估活动。目的:开展太平洋癌症联盟自我(内部)和合作伙伴(外部)评估,以评估联盟的运作、地区和国家合作伙伴关系、可持续性以及地区主义在整合太平洋地区所有慢性病预防和控制方面的作用:方法:对太平洋地区慢性病预防和控制联盟成员(20 人)以及地区和国家合作伙伴组织的代表(26 人)进行了自填式问卷调查和主要信息提供者电话访谈。对联盟和合作伙伴的特征采用了经过验证的多项目测量法,使用 5 点量表。计算了各项指标的Chronbach's alphas和平均值:内部联盟的衡量标准:满意度(4.2,标准差=0.48)、沟通(4.0,标准差=0.56)、尊重(4.0,标准差=0.60)的评分高于外部伙伴关系的衡量标准:资源共享(3.5,标准差=0.74)、地区主义(3.9,标准差=0.47)、调查结果的使用(3.9,标准差=0.50)。中心特别指出了与外部合作伙伴(包括太平洋地区教育与发展中心)的 "合作 "水平。外部合作伙伴认为其与中心的伙伴关系处于 "联盟 "阶段:主要结论:太平洋区域协调理事会成员和外部合作伙伴对其伙伴关系表示满意。所有团体都应继续重视与合作伙伴建立合作关系,以体现真正的区域性方法,维持承诺、联盟和计划,减少美国亚太地区的癌症。该委员会和合作伙伴还应共同努力,整合太平洋地区的所有慢性病预防和控制工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An assessment of the Pacific Regional Cancer Coalition: outcomes and implications of a regional coalition internal and external assessment.

Significance: The Pacific Regional Cancer Coalition (PRCC) provides regional leadership in the U.S. Affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) to implement the Regional Comprehensive Control Plan: 2007-2012, and to evaluate its coalition and partnerships. The Pacific Center of Excellence in the Elimination of Disparities (CEED), aims to reduce cancer disparities and conducts evaluation activities relevant to cancer prevention and control in the USAPI.

Purpose: The PRCC Self (internal) and Partner (external) Assessments were conducted to assess coalition functioning, regional and national partnerships, sustainability, and the role of regionalism for integrating all chronic disease prevention and control in the Pacific.

Methods: Self-administered questionnaires and key informant telephone interviews with PRCC members (N=20), and representatives from regional and national partner organizations were administered (N=26). Validated multi item measures using 5-point scales on coalition and partnership characteristics were used. Chronbach's alphas and averages for the measures were computed.

Results: Internal coalition measures: satisfaction (4.2, SD=0.48) communication (4.0, SD=0.56), respect (4.0, SD=0.60) were rated more highly than external partnership measures: resource sharing (3.5, SD=0.74), regionalism (3.9, SD=0.47), use of findings (3.9, SD=0.50). The PRCC specifically identified its level of "collaboration" with external partners including Pacific CEED. External partners identified its partnership with the PRCC in the "coalition" stage.

Principal conclusions: PRCC members and external partners are satisfied with their partnerships. All groups should continue to focus on building collaboration with partners to reflect a truly regional approach to sustain the commitment, the coalitions and the programming to reduce cancer in the USAPI. PRCC and partners should also work together to integrate all chronic disease prevention and control efforts in the Pacific.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信