简·奥斯汀谈爱情和教育力量。

Patrick Fessenbecker
{"title":"简·奥斯汀谈爱情和教育力量。","authors":"Patrick Fessenbecker","doi":"10.1353/sel.2011.0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay notes initially recent prominence of theories of pedagogy that attempt to \"de-mystify\" it and reveal troubling power relations, and their subsequent contention that love is impossible in the student-teacher relationship. \"Pedagogical\" interpretations of Jane Austen's fiction, however, see pedagogy as essential to love. I argue that this is so precisely because of the power dynamics involved; drawing on Jessica Benjamin's psychoanalytic interpretation of G. W. F. Hegel's analysis of the \"Lord-Bondsman,\" I suggest that Austen portrays the loving relationship as inherently involving the occupation and subsequent exchange of roles as superior and inferior, incarnated as \"teacher\" and \"student.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":82839,"journal":{"name":"Studies in English literature","volume":"51 4","pages":"747-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/sel.2011.0038","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jane Austen on love and pedagogical power.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Fessenbecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sel.2011.0038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This essay notes initially recent prominence of theories of pedagogy that attempt to \\\"de-mystify\\\" it and reveal troubling power relations, and their subsequent contention that love is impossible in the student-teacher relationship. \\\"Pedagogical\\\" interpretations of Jane Austen's fiction, however, see pedagogy as essential to love. I argue that this is so precisely because of the power dynamics involved; drawing on Jessica Benjamin's psychoanalytic interpretation of G. W. F. Hegel's analysis of the \\\"Lord-Bondsman,\\\" I suggest that Austen portrays the loving relationship as inherently involving the occupation and subsequent exchange of roles as superior and inferior, incarnated as \\\"teacher\\\" and \\\"student.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":82839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in English literature\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"747-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/sel.2011.0038\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in English literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2011.0038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in English literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2011.0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文首先注意到最近教育学理论的突出,这些理论试图“去神秘化”它,揭示令人不安的权力关系,以及他们随后的争论,即爱在师生关系中是不可能的。然而,对简·奥斯汀小说的“教育学”解读认为,教育学对爱情至关重要。我认为,这正是因为其中涉及的权力动态;根据杰西卡·本杰明(Jessica Benjamin)对黑格尔(G. W. F. Hegel)对“领主-奴仆”(Lord-Bondsman)的分析所作的精神分析,我认为奥斯汀将爱情关系描绘为固有的,包括职业和随后的上级和下级角色互换,化身为“老师”和“学生”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jane Austen on love and pedagogical power.

This essay notes initially recent prominence of theories of pedagogy that attempt to "de-mystify" it and reveal troubling power relations, and their subsequent contention that love is impossible in the student-teacher relationship. "Pedagogical" interpretations of Jane Austen's fiction, however, see pedagogy as essential to love. I argue that this is so precisely because of the power dynamics involved; drawing on Jessica Benjamin's psychoanalytic interpretation of G. W. F. Hegel's analysis of the "Lord-Bondsman," I suggest that Austen portrays the loving relationship as inherently involving the occupation and subsequent exchange of roles as superior and inferior, incarnated as "teacher" and "student."

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信