体外膜氧合加持续动静脉血液滤过的预后分析。

Chang Gung medical journal Pub Date : 2011-11-01
Tsung-Yu Tsai Tsai, Feng-Chun Tsai, Chih-Hsiang Chang, Chang-Chyi Jenq, Hsiang-Hao Hsu, Ming-Yang Chang, Ya-Chung Tian, Cheng-Chieh Hung, Ji-Tseng Fang, Chih-Wei Yang, Yung-Chang Chen
{"title":"体外膜氧合加持续动静脉血液滤过的预后分析。","authors":"Tsung-Yu Tsai Tsai,&nbsp;Feng-Chun Tsai,&nbsp;Chih-Hsiang Chang,&nbsp;Chang-Chyi Jenq,&nbsp;Hsiang-Hao Hsu,&nbsp;Ming-Yang Chang,&nbsp;Ya-Chung Tian,&nbsp;Cheng-Chieh Hung,&nbsp;Ji-Tseng Fang,&nbsp;Chih-Wei Yang,&nbsp;Yung-Chang Chen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been utilized for critically ill patients such as those with life-threatening respiratory failure or post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Patients on ECMO with acute renal failure have high mortality rates. This study identifies specific predictors of hospital mortality for patients receiving ECMO and continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration (CAVH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reviewed the medical records of 123 critically ill patients on ECMO plus CAVH at a cardiovascular surgical intensive care unit (CVSICU) at a tertiary care university hospital between March 2003 and August 2010. Patient baseline, clinical, and laboratory data were collected retrospectively as survival predicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall mortality rate was 85.4%. The most common conditions requiring ECMO plus CAVH were cardiogenic shock and oliguria. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and organ system failure (OSF) score both indicated good discriminative power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.812 ± 0.048 and 0.758 ± 0.057, respectively). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that age, mean arterial pressure, and OSF score on day 1 of ECMO plus CAVH were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. Cumulative survival rates at the 6-month follow-up differed significantly (p < 0.001) between those with an OSF score ≤ 4 vs. those with an OSF score > 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During ECMO plus CAVH support, both the OSF and APACHE II scores showed good discriminative power in predicting hospital mortality for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10018,"journal":{"name":"Chang Gung medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognosis of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation plus continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration.\",\"authors\":\"Tsung-Yu Tsai Tsai,&nbsp;Feng-Chun Tsai,&nbsp;Chih-Hsiang Chang,&nbsp;Chang-Chyi Jenq,&nbsp;Hsiang-Hao Hsu,&nbsp;Ming-Yang Chang,&nbsp;Ya-Chung Tian,&nbsp;Cheng-Chieh Hung,&nbsp;Ji-Tseng Fang,&nbsp;Chih-Wei Yang,&nbsp;Yung-Chang Chen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been utilized for critically ill patients such as those with life-threatening respiratory failure or post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Patients on ECMO with acute renal failure have high mortality rates. This study identifies specific predictors of hospital mortality for patients receiving ECMO and continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration (CAVH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reviewed the medical records of 123 critically ill patients on ECMO plus CAVH at a cardiovascular surgical intensive care unit (CVSICU) at a tertiary care university hospital between March 2003 and August 2010. Patient baseline, clinical, and laboratory data were collected retrospectively as survival predicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall mortality rate was 85.4%. The most common conditions requiring ECMO plus CAVH were cardiogenic shock and oliguria. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and organ system failure (OSF) score both indicated good discriminative power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.812 ± 0.048 and 0.758 ± 0.057, respectively). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that age, mean arterial pressure, and OSF score on day 1 of ECMO plus CAVH were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. Cumulative survival rates at the 6-month follow-up differed significantly (p < 0.001) between those with an OSF score ≤ 4 vs. those with an OSF score > 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During ECMO plus CAVH support, both the OSF and APACHE II scores showed good discriminative power in predicting hospital mortality for these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chang Gung medical journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chang Gung medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chang Gung medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体外膜氧合(ECMO)已被用于危重患者,如危及生命的呼吸衰竭或心脏切开术后心源性休克。急性肾功能衰竭的ECMO患者死亡率高。本研究确定了接受ECMO和持续动静脉血液滤过(CAVH)患者住院死亡率的具体预测因素。方法:本研究回顾了2003年3月至2010年8月在某三级大学医院心血管外科重症监护病房(CVSICU)接受ECMO + CAVH治疗的123例危重患者的医疗记录。回顾性收集患者基线、临床和实验室数据作为生存预测指标。结果:总死亡率为85.4%。最常见的需要ECMO加CAVH的情况是心源性休克和少尿。急性生理与慢性健康评估II (APACHE II)评分和器官系统衰竭(OSF)评分均显示良好的判别能力(受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUROC]分别为0.812±0.048和0.758±0.057)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,年龄、平均动脉压、ECMO + CAVH第1天OSF评分是院内死亡的独立危险因素。OSF评分≤4与OSF评分> 4的患者6个月随访累积生存率差异显著(p < 0.001)。结论:在ECMO + CAVH支持期间,OSF和APACHE II评分在预测这些患者的住院死亡率方面具有良好的判别能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognosis of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation plus continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been utilized for critically ill patients such as those with life-threatening respiratory failure or post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Patients on ECMO with acute renal failure have high mortality rates. This study identifies specific predictors of hospital mortality for patients receiving ECMO and continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration (CAVH).

Methods: This study reviewed the medical records of 123 critically ill patients on ECMO plus CAVH at a cardiovascular surgical intensive care unit (CVSICU) at a tertiary care university hospital between March 2003 and August 2010. Patient baseline, clinical, and laboratory data were collected retrospectively as survival predicators.

Results: The overall mortality rate was 85.4%. The most common conditions requiring ECMO plus CAVH were cardiogenic shock and oliguria. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and organ system failure (OSF) score both indicated good discriminative power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.812 ± 0.048 and 0.758 ± 0.057, respectively). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that age, mean arterial pressure, and OSF score on day 1 of ECMO plus CAVH were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. Cumulative survival rates at the 6-month follow-up differed significantly (p < 0.001) between those with an OSF score ≤ 4 vs. those with an OSF score > 4.

Conclusions: During ECMO plus CAVH support, both the OSF and APACHE II scores showed good discriminative power in predicting hospital mortality for these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信