手术部位感染预防的主动性-患者态度和依从性。

Nicholas Ramos, Faith Skeete, Janet P Haas, Lorraine Hutzler, James Slover, Michael Phillips, Joseph Bosco
{"title":"手术部位感染预防的主动性-患者态度和依从性。","authors":"Nicholas Ramos,&nbsp;Faith Skeete,&nbsp;Janet P Haas,&nbsp;Lorraine Hutzler,&nbsp;James Slover,&nbsp;Michael Phillips,&nbsp;Joseph Bosco","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the effect of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) decolonization on surgical site infection (SSI) rates has been studied, patient tolerance and acceptance of these regimens has not been assessed. Surgical patients at our hospital's Pre-Admission Testing Clinic (PAT) receive SA reduction protocols instructing the preoperative use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) soap and intranasal mupirocin ointment (MO). Certain insurers do not cover MO costs resulting in out of pocket (OOP) expenses for some patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed patient attitudes and compliance with our hospital's SA decolonization regimen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-hundred-forty-six patients received surveys. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of respondents fitting inclusion criteria, 81% followed the MO protocol (MO users) while 89% followed the CHG protocol (CHG users). Fifty-four percent of MO users reported OOP expenses and 13% reported a hard or very hard financial burden. Ninety-three percent of CHG users reported the protocol was easy or very easy to follow.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Eighty-one percent of patients receiving the SA protocol were fully compliant despite cost or difficulty obtaining MO. Given these barriers and some difficulty with CHG application, we hypothesize compliance may be improved if MO is provided to patients without OOP expenses and if the CHG application method is simplified.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical site infection prevention initiative - patient attitude and compliance.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Ramos,&nbsp;Faith Skeete,&nbsp;Janet P Haas,&nbsp;Lorraine Hutzler,&nbsp;James Slover,&nbsp;Michael Phillips,&nbsp;Joseph Bosco\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the effect of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) decolonization on surgical site infection (SSI) rates has been studied, patient tolerance and acceptance of these regimens has not been assessed. Surgical patients at our hospital's Pre-Admission Testing Clinic (PAT) receive SA reduction protocols instructing the preoperative use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) soap and intranasal mupirocin ointment (MO). Certain insurers do not cover MO costs resulting in out of pocket (OOP) expenses for some patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed patient attitudes and compliance with our hospital's SA decolonization regimen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-hundred-forty-six patients received surveys. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of respondents fitting inclusion criteria, 81% followed the MO protocol (MO users) while 89% followed the CHG protocol (CHG users). Fifty-four percent of MO users reported OOP expenses and 13% reported a hard or very hard financial burden. Ninety-three percent of CHG users reported the protocol was easy or very easy to follow.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Eighty-one percent of patients receiving the SA protocol were fully compliant despite cost or difficulty obtaining MO. Given these barriers and some difficulty with CHG application, we hypothesize compliance may be improved if MO is provided to patients without OOP expenses and if the CHG application method is simplified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然已经研究了金黄色葡萄球菌(SA)去菌落对手术部位感染(SSI)率的影响,但尚未评估患者对这些方案的耐受性和接受度。我院入院前检查门诊(PAT)的外科患者接受SA降低方案,指导术前使用葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)肥皂和鼻内莫匹罗星软膏(MO)。某些保险公司不承担MO费用,导致一些患者的自费(OOP)费用。目的:本研究评估患者对我院SA去殖民化方案的态度和依从性。方法:对146例患者进行问卷调查。采用描述性统计进行分析。结果:符合纳入标准的受访者中,81%的人遵循MO方案(MO用户),89%的人遵循CHG方案(CHG用户)。54%的MO用户报告了OOP费用,13%的用户报告了严重或非常严重的财务负担。百分之九十三的CHG用户报告说,该方案很容易或非常容易遵循。结论:81%接受SA方案的患者完全依从,尽管成本或难以获得MO。考虑到这些障碍和CHG应用的一些困难,我们假设如果向患者提供MO而不需要OOP费用,并简化CHG应用方法,可能会提高依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical site infection prevention initiative - patient attitude and compliance.

Background: Although the effect of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) decolonization on surgical site infection (SSI) rates has been studied, patient tolerance and acceptance of these regimens has not been assessed. Surgical patients at our hospital's Pre-Admission Testing Clinic (PAT) receive SA reduction protocols instructing the preoperative use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) soap and intranasal mupirocin ointment (MO). Certain insurers do not cover MO costs resulting in out of pocket (OOP) expenses for some patients.

Objective: This study assessed patient attitudes and compliance with our hospital's SA decolonization regimen.

Methods: One-hundred-forty-six patients received surveys. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

Results: Of respondents fitting inclusion criteria, 81% followed the MO protocol (MO users) while 89% followed the CHG protocol (CHG users). Fifty-four percent of MO users reported OOP expenses and 13% reported a hard or very hard financial burden. Ninety-three percent of CHG users reported the protocol was easy or very easy to follow.

Conclusion: Eighty-one percent of patients receiving the SA protocol were fully compliant despite cost or difficulty obtaining MO. Given these barriers and some difficulty with CHG application, we hypothesize compliance may be improved if MO is provided to patients without OOP expenses and if the CHG application method is simplified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信