辅助结肠镜插入的水法:经验丰富的结肠镜医师的学习曲线。

Francisco C Ramirez, Felix W Leung
{"title":"辅助结肠镜插入的水法:经验丰富的结肠镜医师的学习曲线。","authors":"Francisco C Ramirez,&nbsp;Felix W Leung","doi":"10.4161/jig.1.3.18507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: The water method has promising features for colonoscopy but the learning curve to master the technique is unknown. AIMS: To describe the learning phase, and pitfalls of the water method and its impact on procedural outcomes by an experienced colonoscopist. DESIGN: Review of prospectively collected data in a performance improvement project SETTING: endoscopy Unit at a VA medical center PATIENTS: 200 consecutive veterans undergoing colonoscopy METHODS: An experienced colonoscopist examined 4 consecutive groups of 25 patients each using the water method to define the learning curve. Outcomes were compared to a historical cohort (n=100) examined by the same colonoscopist using usual air insufflation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intent-to-treat (ITT) cecal intubation rate. RESULTS: ITT cecal intubation rate increased from 76% (first) to 96% (fourth quartile). Cecal intubation time in the first 2 quartiles was significantly longer (8.9±1.0 and 8.2±0.8 min, respectively) than that in the historical cohort (5.8±0.4 min) but decreased and became comparable to control values in the next 2 quartiles (7.2±0.9 and 6.6±0.6 min, respectively). Overall adenoma detection rate as a group (55%), compared favorably to the historical cohort (46%). CONCLUSIONS: The water method is relatively easy to learn for an experienced colonoscopist. Mastery of the method resulted in cecal intubation rate and overall adenoma detection rate meeting quality performance standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":89416,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional gastroenterology","volume":"1 3","pages":"97-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234692/pdf/jig0103_0097.pdf","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The water method for aiding colonoscope insertion: the learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist.\",\"authors\":\"Francisco C Ramirez,&nbsp;Felix W Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.4161/jig.1.3.18507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND: The water method has promising features for colonoscopy but the learning curve to master the technique is unknown. AIMS: To describe the learning phase, and pitfalls of the water method and its impact on procedural outcomes by an experienced colonoscopist. DESIGN: Review of prospectively collected data in a performance improvement project SETTING: endoscopy Unit at a VA medical center PATIENTS: 200 consecutive veterans undergoing colonoscopy METHODS: An experienced colonoscopist examined 4 consecutive groups of 25 patients each using the water method to define the learning curve. Outcomes were compared to a historical cohort (n=100) examined by the same colonoscopist using usual air insufflation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intent-to-treat (ITT) cecal intubation rate. RESULTS: ITT cecal intubation rate increased from 76% (first) to 96% (fourth quartile). Cecal intubation time in the first 2 quartiles was significantly longer (8.9±1.0 and 8.2±0.8 min, respectively) than that in the historical cohort (5.8±0.4 min) but decreased and became comparable to control values in the next 2 quartiles (7.2±0.9 and 6.6±0.6 min, respectively). Overall adenoma detection rate as a group (55%), compared favorably to the historical cohort (46%). CONCLUSIONS: The water method is relatively easy to learn for an experienced colonoscopist. Mastery of the method resulted in cecal intubation rate and overall adenoma detection rate meeting quality performance standards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"97-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234692/pdf/jig0103_0097.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4161/jig.1.3.18507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/jig.1.3.18507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

背景:水法在结肠镜检查中具有很好的特点,但掌握这项技术的学习曲线尚不清楚。目的:描述一名经验丰富的结肠镜医师对水法的学习阶段、陷阱及其对手术结果的影响。设计:回顾一项绩效改善项目前瞻性收集的数据设置:退伍军人医疗中心内窥镜检查室患者:200名连续接受结肠镜检查的退伍军人方法:一名经验丰富的结肠镜检查者使用水法对4组连续25名患者进行检查,以确定学习曲线。结果与历史队列(n=100)进行比较,该队列由同一名结肠镜检查师使用常规充气检查。主要观察指标:意向治疗(ITT)盲肠插管率。结果:ITT盲肠插管率从76%(第一组)上升到96%(第四组)。前2个四分位数的盲肠插管时间(分别为8.9±1.0和8.2±0.8 min)明显高于历史队列(5.8±0.4 min),但在后2个四分位数(分别为7.2±0.9和6.6±0.6 min)减少并与对照组相当。整体腺瘤检出率(55%)优于历史队列(46%)。结论:对于经验丰富的结肠镜医师来说,水法相对容易学习。掌握该方法后,盲肠插管率和整体腺瘤检出率均达到质量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The water method for aiding colonoscope insertion: the learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist.

The water method for aiding colonoscope insertion: the learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist.

BACKGROUND: The water method has promising features for colonoscopy but the learning curve to master the technique is unknown. AIMS: To describe the learning phase, and pitfalls of the water method and its impact on procedural outcomes by an experienced colonoscopist. DESIGN: Review of prospectively collected data in a performance improvement project SETTING: endoscopy Unit at a VA medical center PATIENTS: 200 consecutive veterans undergoing colonoscopy METHODS: An experienced colonoscopist examined 4 consecutive groups of 25 patients each using the water method to define the learning curve. Outcomes were compared to a historical cohort (n=100) examined by the same colonoscopist using usual air insufflation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intent-to-treat (ITT) cecal intubation rate. RESULTS: ITT cecal intubation rate increased from 76% (first) to 96% (fourth quartile). Cecal intubation time in the first 2 quartiles was significantly longer (8.9±1.0 and 8.2±0.8 min, respectively) than that in the historical cohort (5.8±0.4 min) but decreased and became comparable to control values in the next 2 quartiles (7.2±0.9 and 6.6±0.6 min, respectively). Overall adenoma detection rate as a group (55%), compared favorably to the historical cohort (46%). CONCLUSIONS: The water method is relatively easy to learn for an experienced colonoscopist. Mastery of the method resulted in cecal intubation rate and overall adenoma detection rate meeting quality performance standards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信