对智能手机和移动设备上的临床决策支持工具中的儿科药物信息内容进行系统评估。

Sandra Benavides, Hyla H Polen, Chilla E Goncz, Kevin A Clauson
{"title":"对智能手机和移动设备上的临床决策支持工具中的儿科药物信息内容进行系统评估。","authors":"Sandra Benavides,&nbsp;Hyla H Polen,&nbsp;Chilla E Goncz,&nbsp;Kevin A Clauson","doi":"10.14236/jhi.v19i1.792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication information is often poorly delineated for paediatric patients, resulting in high off-label and non-licensed use of drugs in this population. Access to accurate medicines information in this population becomes a necessity in order to avoid medication errors. Clinical decision support tools (CDSTs), which are increasingly available on mobile devices (e.g. smartphones), can provide healthcare providers with convenient access to paediatric medicines information at point of care. However, to date no systematic evaluation of the content in these CDSTs has been conducted.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate paediatric medicines information in CDSTs for smartphones and other mobile devices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Evaluation of CDSTs according to scope and completeness was accomplished via weighted categories of 108 questions distributed evenly across three age groups: infants, children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three paediatric-specific databases and six general databases were evaluated. The best performer provided 75.9% of the answers for scope and scored 69.7% for completeness. Databases generally performed less effectively in providing answers sourced from clinical guidelines compared with more conservative sources such as package inserts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, general medicines information CDSTs performed better than paediatric-specific CDSTs in both scope and completeness. Results from this study may help guide CDST selection on mobile devices by healthcare professionals whose patient populations include paediatrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":30591,"journal":{"name":"Informatics in Primary Care","volume":"19 1","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic evaluation of paediatric medicines information content in clinical decision support tools on smartphones and mobile devices.\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Benavides,&nbsp;Hyla H Polen,&nbsp;Chilla E Goncz,&nbsp;Kevin A Clauson\",\"doi\":\"10.14236/jhi.v19i1.792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication information is often poorly delineated for paediatric patients, resulting in high off-label and non-licensed use of drugs in this population. Access to accurate medicines information in this population becomes a necessity in order to avoid medication errors. Clinical decision support tools (CDSTs), which are increasingly available on mobile devices (e.g. smartphones), can provide healthcare providers with convenient access to paediatric medicines information at point of care. However, to date no systematic evaluation of the content in these CDSTs has been conducted.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate paediatric medicines information in CDSTs for smartphones and other mobile devices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Evaluation of CDSTs according to scope and completeness was accomplished via weighted categories of 108 questions distributed evenly across three age groups: infants, children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three paediatric-specific databases and six general databases were evaluated. The best performer provided 75.9% of the answers for scope and scored 69.7% for completeness. Databases generally performed less effectively in providing answers sourced from clinical guidelines compared with more conservative sources such as package inserts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, general medicines information CDSTs performed better than paediatric-specific CDSTs in both scope and completeness. Results from this study may help guide CDST selection on mobile devices by healthcare professionals whose patient populations include paediatrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informatics in Primary Care\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"39-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informatics in Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v19i1.792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics in Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v19i1.792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:儿科患者的药物信息通常描述不清,导致该人群中超说明书和未经许可使用药物的情况很高。为了避免用药错误,在这一人群中获得准确的药物信息是必要的。临床决策支持工具(CDSTs)越来越多地在移动设备(如智能手机)上使用,可以为医疗保健提供者提供方便的儿科药物信息。然而,到目前为止,还没有对这些CDSTs的内容进行系统的评估。目的:评价智能手机和其他移动设备CDSTs中的儿科药物信息。方法:对CDSTs的范围和完整性进行评估,通过加权分类108个问题,均匀分布在三个年龄组:婴儿、儿童和青少年。结果:对3个儿科数据库和6个普通数据库进行了评估。表现最好的人提供了75.9%的范围答案和69.7%的完整性答案。数据库通常在提供来自临床指南的答案方面表现得不如更保守的来源(如包装说明书)有效。结论:总体而言,一般药物信息CDSTs在范围和完整性方面优于儿科特异性CDSTs。本研究的结果可能有助于指导包括儿科在内的医疗保健专业人员在移动设备上选择CDST。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic evaluation of paediatric medicines information content in clinical decision support tools on smartphones and mobile devices.

Background: Medication information is often poorly delineated for paediatric patients, resulting in high off-label and non-licensed use of drugs in this population. Access to accurate medicines information in this population becomes a necessity in order to avoid medication errors. Clinical decision support tools (CDSTs), which are increasingly available on mobile devices (e.g. smartphones), can provide healthcare providers with convenient access to paediatric medicines information at point of care. However, to date no systematic evaluation of the content in these CDSTs has been conducted.

Objectives: To evaluate paediatric medicines information in CDSTs for smartphones and other mobile devices.

Method: Evaluation of CDSTs according to scope and completeness was accomplished via weighted categories of 108 questions distributed evenly across three age groups: infants, children and adolescents.

Results: Three paediatric-specific databases and six general databases were evaluated. The best performer provided 75.9% of the answers for scope and scored 69.7% for completeness. Databases generally performed less effectively in providing answers sourced from clinical guidelines compared with more conservative sources such as package inserts.

Conclusions: Overall, general medicines information CDSTs performed better than paediatric-specific CDSTs in both scope and completeness. Results from this study may help guide CDST selection on mobile devices by healthcare professionals whose patient populations include paediatrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信