甲状腺手术中偶发的甲状旁腺疾病:我们应该切除它们吗?

ISRN surgery Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-04-20 DOI:10.5402/2011/962186
S Helme, A Lulsegged, P Sinha
{"title":"甲状腺手术中偶发的甲状旁腺疾病:我们应该切除它们吗?","authors":"S Helme,&nbsp;A Lulsegged,&nbsp;P Sinha","doi":"10.5402/2011/962186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim. Despite an incidence of parathyroid \"incidentalomas\" of 0.2%-4.5%, only approximately 135 cases have been reported in the literature. We present eight patients in whom an incidental abnormal parathyroid gland was found during routine thyroid surgery. We have reviewed the literature and postulate whether these glands could represent further evidence of a preclinical stage of primary hyperparathyroidism. Methods. A retrospective analysis of all 236 thyroid operations performed by a single surgeon was performed to identify patients in whom abnormal parathyroid tissue was removed at surgery. Results. 8/236 patients (3.39%) had a single macroscopically abnormal parathyroid gland removed and sent for analysis. Seven patients were found to have histological evidence of a parathyroid adenoma or hyperplasia. None of the patients had abnormal serum calcium detected preoperatively. Postoperatively, four patients had normal calcium, three had temporary hypocalcaemia and one refused followup. No patients had recurrent laryngeal nerve impairment. Conclusions. Despite the risk of removing a histologically normal gland, we believe that when parathyroid \"incidentalomas\" are found during surgery they should be excised and sent for histological analysis. We have found this to be a safe procedure with minimal morbidity to the patient. As the natural history of primary hyperparathyroidism is better understood, these glands found in normocalcaemic patients may in fact represent the early or preclinical phase of the disease. By removing them at the original operation, the patient is saved redo neck surgery with its high complication rate as or when clinically apparent primary hyperparthryoidism develops in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":89400,"journal":{"name":"ISRN surgery","volume":"2011 ","pages":"962186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2011/962186","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidental Parathyroid Disease during Thyroid Surgery: Should We Remove Them?\",\"authors\":\"S Helme,&nbsp;A Lulsegged,&nbsp;P Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.5402/2011/962186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aim. Despite an incidence of parathyroid \\\"incidentalomas\\\" of 0.2%-4.5%, only approximately 135 cases have been reported in the literature. We present eight patients in whom an incidental abnormal parathyroid gland was found during routine thyroid surgery. We have reviewed the literature and postulate whether these glands could represent further evidence of a preclinical stage of primary hyperparathyroidism. Methods. A retrospective analysis of all 236 thyroid operations performed by a single surgeon was performed to identify patients in whom abnormal parathyroid tissue was removed at surgery. Results. 8/236 patients (3.39%) had a single macroscopically abnormal parathyroid gland removed and sent for analysis. Seven patients were found to have histological evidence of a parathyroid adenoma or hyperplasia. None of the patients had abnormal serum calcium detected preoperatively. Postoperatively, four patients had normal calcium, three had temporary hypocalcaemia and one refused followup. No patients had recurrent laryngeal nerve impairment. Conclusions. Despite the risk of removing a histologically normal gland, we believe that when parathyroid \\\"incidentalomas\\\" are found during surgery they should be excised and sent for histological analysis. We have found this to be a safe procedure with minimal morbidity to the patient. As the natural history of primary hyperparathyroidism is better understood, these glands found in normocalcaemic patients may in fact represent the early or preclinical phase of the disease. By removing them at the original operation, the patient is saved redo neck surgery with its high complication rate as or when clinically apparent primary hyperparthryoidism develops in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN surgery\",\"volume\":\"2011 \",\"pages\":\"962186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2011/962186\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/962186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/4/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/962186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

的目标。尽管甲状旁腺“偶发瘤”的发生率为0.2%-4.5%,但文献中仅报道了约135例。我们提出了8例患者在例行甲状腺手术中发现偶然异常甲状旁腺。我们已经回顾了文献,并假设这些腺体是否可以代表原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进临床前阶段的进一步证据。方法。回顾性分析了同一位外科医生进行的所有236例甲状腺手术,以确定在手术中切除异常甲状旁腺组织的患者。结果:236例患者中有8例(3.39%)切除了单个宏观异常甲状旁腺并送院分析。7例患者被发现有甲状旁腺瘤或增生的组织学证据。术前无血钙异常。术后4例钙正常,3例暂时性低钙,1例拒绝随访。无患者出现喉返神经损伤。结论。尽管有切除组织学正常腺体的风险,但我们认为,当在手术中发现甲状旁腺“偶发瘤”时,应切除并送去做组织学分析。我们发现这是一种安全的手术,对患者的发病率最低。随着原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症的自然史被更好地理解,这些腺体在正常钙血症患者中发现,实际上可能代表疾病的早期或临床前阶段。通过在最初的手术中切除它们,当临床表现明显的原发性甲状旁腺亢在未来发展时,患者可以避免再做颈部手术,其并发症发生率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidental Parathyroid Disease during Thyroid Surgery: Should We Remove Them?

Aim. Despite an incidence of parathyroid "incidentalomas" of 0.2%-4.5%, only approximately 135 cases have been reported in the literature. We present eight patients in whom an incidental abnormal parathyroid gland was found during routine thyroid surgery. We have reviewed the literature and postulate whether these glands could represent further evidence of a preclinical stage of primary hyperparathyroidism. Methods. A retrospective analysis of all 236 thyroid operations performed by a single surgeon was performed to identify patients in whom abnormal parathyroid tissue was removed at surgery. Results. 8/236 patients (3.39%) had a single macroscopically abnormal parathyroid gland removed and sent for analysis. Seven patients were found to have histological evidence of a parathyroid adenoma or hyperplasia. None of the patients had abnormal serum calcium detected preoperatively. Postoperatively, four patients had normal calcium, three had temporary hypocalcaemia and one refused followup. No patients had recurrent laryngeal nerve impairment. Conclusions. Despite the risk of removing a histologically normal gland, we believe that when parathyroid "incidentalomas" are found during surgery they should be excised and sent for histological analysis. We have found this to be a safe procedure with minimal morbidity to the patient. As the natural history of primary hyperparathyroidism is better understood, these glands found in normocalcaemic patients may in fact represent the early or preclinical phase of the disease. By removing them at the original operation, the patient is saved redo neck surgery with its high complication rate as or when clinically apparent primary hyperparthryoidism develops in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信