{"title":"实时荧光定量PCR与RFLP检测结直肠癌样本K-ras的实验室间比较。","authors":"Andrea Judith Lanthaler, Gilbert Spizzo, Manfred Mitterer, Christine Mian, Guido Mazzoleni","doi":"10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820e5f9a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Activating mutations of K-ras have been described in approximately 40% of patients with colorectal cancer, and are associated with resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted antibodies, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. Cost-effective and easy methods to determine K-ras mutations are urgently needed. Samples from 31 patients were tested. In laboratory 1, a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique was used. All samples (n=31) were additionally tested using a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis in laboratory 2. All results were confirmed by direct sequencing. In the first run, a concordance of real-time PCR and RFLP was observed in 77.4% (24 of 31) of samples. After resampling and reevaluation, a concordance of 93.5% (30 of 31) could be achieved. One of 7 (6.5%) initial discordant cases showed a mutation using real-time PCR and no mutation using RFLP, but the mutation was confirmed by direct sequencing. Real-time PCR and RFLP can be considered as valid K-ras mutation detection techniques. However, in patient probes with lower amounts of tumor cells and wild-type K-ras, reanalysis of further tumor tissue is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":11235,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","volume":"20 2","pages":"90-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820e5f9a","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interlaboratory comparison of K-ras testing by real-time PCR and RFLP in colorectal cancer samples.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Judith Lanthaler, Gilbert Spizzo, Manfred Mitterer, Christine Mian, Guido Mazzoleni\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820e5f9a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Activating mutations of K-ras have been described in approximately 40% of patients with colorectal cancer, and are associated with resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted antibodies, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. Cost-effective and easy methods to determine K-ras mutations are urgently needed. Samples from 31 patients were tested. In laboratory 1, a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique was used. All samples (n=31) were additionally tested using a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis in laboratory 2. All results were confirmed by direct sequencing. In the first run, a concordance of real-time PCR and RFLP was observed in 77.4% (24 of 31) of samples. After resampling and reevaluation, a concordance of 93.5% (30 of 31) could be achieved. One of 7 (6.5%) initial discordant cases showed a mutation using real-time PCR and no mutation using RFLP, but the mutation was confirmed by direct sequencing. Real-time PCR and RFLP can be considered as valid K-ras mutation detection techniques. However, in patient probes with lower amounts of tumor cells and wild-type K-ras, reanalysis of further tumor tissue is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"90-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820e5f9a\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820e5f9a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820e5f9a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interlaboratory comparison of K-ras testing by real-time PCR and RFLP in colorectal cancer samples.
Activating mutations of K-ras have been described in approximately 40% of patients with colorectal cancer, and are associated with resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted antibodies, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. Cost-effective and easy methods to determine K-ras mutations are urgently needed. Samples from 31 patients were tested. In laboratory 1, a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique was used. All samples (n=31) were additionally tested using a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis in laboratory 2. All results were confirmed by direct sequencing. In the first run, a concordance of real-time PCR and RFLP was observed in 77.4% (24 of 31) of samples. After resampling and reevaluation, a concordance of 93.5% (30 of 31) could be achieved. One of 7 (6.5%) initial discordant cases showed a mutation using real-time PCR and no mutation using RFLP, but the mutation was confirmed by direct sequencing. Real-time PCR and RFLP can be considered as valid K-ras mutation detection techniques. However, in patient probes with lower amounts of tumor cells and wild-type K-ras, reanalysis of further tumor tissue is recommended.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Molecular Pathology focuses on providing clinical and academic pathologists with coverage of the latest molecular technologies, timely reviews of established techniques, and papers on the applications of these methods to all aspects of surgical pathology and laboratory medicine. It publishes original, peer-reviewed contributions on molecular probes for diagnosis, such as tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and in situ hybridization. Articles demonstrate how these highly sensitive techniques can be applied for more accurate diagnosis.