一种在整个基因水平上评估关联证据强度的简单方法。

Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
David Curtis, Anna E Vine, Jo Knight
{"title":"一种在整个基因水平上评估关联证据强度的简单方法。","authors":"David Curtis, Anna E Vine, Jo Knight","doi":"10.2147/aabc.s4095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is expected that different markers may show different patterns of association with different pathogenic variants within a given gene. It would be helpful to combine the evidence implicating association at the level of the whole gene rather than just for individual markers or haplotypes. Doing this is complicated by the fact that different markers do not represent independent sources of information.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We propose combining the p values from all single locus and/or multilocus analyses of different markers according to the formula of Fisher, X = ∑(-2ln(p(i))), and then assessing the empirical significance of this statistic using permutation testing. We present an example application to 19 markers around the HTRA2 gene in a case-control study of Parkinson's disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applying our approach shows that, although some individual tests produce low p values, overall association at the level of the gene is not supported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Approaches such as this should be more widely used in assimilating the overall evidence supporting involvement of a gene in a particular disease. Information can be combined from biallelic and multiallelic markers and from single markers along with multimarker analyses. Single genes can be tested or results from groups of genes involved in the same pathway could be combined in order to test biologically relevant hypotheses. The approach has been implemented in a computer program called COMBASSOC which is made available for downloading.</p>","PeriodicalId":53584,"journal":{"name":"Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry","volume":"1 ","pages":"115-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3169937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simple method for assessing the strength of evidence for association at the level of the whole gene.\",\"authors\":\"David Curtis, Anna E Vine, Jo Knight\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/aabc.s4095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is expected that different markers may show different patterns of association with different pathogenic variants within a given gene. It would be helpful to combine the evidence implicating association at the level of the whole gene rather than just for individual markers or haplotypes. Doing this is complicated by the fact that different markers do not represent independent sources of information.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We propose combining the p values from all single locus and/or multilocus analyses of different markers according to the formula of Fisher, X = ∑(-2ln(p(i))), and then assessing the empirical significance of this statistic using permutation testing. We present an example application to 19 markers around the HTRA2 gene in a case-control study of Parkinson's disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applying our approach shows that, although some individual tests produce low p values, overall association at the level of the gene is not supported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Approaches such as this should be more widely used in assimilating the overall evidence supporting involvement of a gene in a particular disease. Information can be combined from biallelic and multiallelic markers and from single markers along with multimarker analyses. Single genes can be tested or results from groups of genes involved in the same pathway could be combined in order to test biologically relevant hypotheses. The approach has been implemented in a computer program called COMBASSOC which is made available for downloading.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"115-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3169937/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/aabc.s4095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2008/11/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/aabc.s4095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在给定的基因中,不同的标记物可能与不同的致病变异表现出不同的关联模式。这将有助于在整个基因水平上结合暗示关联的证据,而不仅仅是单个标记或单倍型。由于不同的标记并不代表独立的信息来源,这样做就变得复杂了。方法:我们建议根据Fisher公式,X =∑(-2ln(p(i))),将不同标记的所有单位点和/或多位点分析的p值组合起来,然后使用置换检验来评估该统计量的经验意义。在帕金森病的病例对照研究中,我们提出了一个应用于HTRA2基因周围的19个标记的例子。结果:应用我们的方法表明,尽管一些单独的测试产生低p值,但在基因水平上的总体关联不被支持。讨论:诸如此类的方法应更广泛地用于吸收支持基因参与特定疾病的总体证据。信息可以结合双等位基因和多等位基因标记,以及单标记和多标记分析。可以测试单个基因,也可以将参与同一途径的基因组的结果结合起来,以测试生物学相关的假设。该方法已在一个名为COMBASSOC的计算机程序中实现,该程序可供下载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A simple method for assessing the strength of evidence for association at the level of the whole gene.

Introduction: It is expected that different markers may show different patterns of association with different pathogenic variants within a given gene. It would be helpful to combine the evidence implicating association at the level of the whole gene rather than just for individual markers or haplotypes. Doing this is complicated by the fact that different markers do not represent independent sources of information.

Method: We propose combining the p values from all single locus and/or multilocus analyses of different markers according to the formula of Fisher, X = ∑(-2ln(p(i))), and then assessing the empirical significance of this statistic using permutation testing. We present an example application to 19 markers around the HTRA2 gene in a case-control study of Parkinson's disease.

Results: Applying our approach shows that, although some individual tests produce low p values, overall association at the level of the gene is not supported.

Discussion: Approaches such as this should be more widely used in assimilating the overall evidence supporting involvement of a gene in a particular disease. Information can be combined from biallelic and multiallelic markers and from single markers along with multimarker analyses. Single genes can be tested or results from groups of genes involved in the same pathway could be combined in order to test biologically relevant hypotheses. The approach has been implemented in a computer program called COMBASSOC which is made available for downloading.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry
Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信