评估在非专业芭蕾舞者的下肢运动:髋关节外展和屈曲。

Erica E Valenti, Vitor E Valenti, Celso Ferreira, Luiz Carlos M Vanderlei, Oseas F Moura Filho, Tatiana Dias de Carvalho, Nadir Tassi, Marcio Petenusso, Claudio Leone, Edison N Fujiki, Hugo Macedo Junior, Carlos B de Mello Monteiro, Isadora L Moreno, Ana Clara Cr Gonçalves, Luiz Carlos de Abreu
{"title":"评估在非专业芭蕾舞者的下肢运动:髋关节外展和屈曲。","authors":"Erica E Valenti,&nbsp;Vitor E Valenti,&nbsp;Celso Ferreira,&nbsp;Luiz Carlos M Vanderlei,&nbsp;Oseas F Moura Filho,&nbsp;Tatiana Dias de Carvalho,&nbsp;Nadir Tassi,&nbsp;Marcio Petenusso,&nbsp;Claudio Leone,&nbsp;Edison N Fujiki,&nbsp;Hugo Macedo Junior,&nbsp;Carlos B de Mello Monteiro,&nbsp;Isadora L Moreno,&nbsp;Ana Clara Cr Gonçalves,&nbsp;Luiz Carlos de Abreu","doi":"10.1186/1758-2555-3-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The literature indicated that the majority of professional ballet dancers present static and active dynamic range of motion difference between left and right lower limbs, however, no previous study focused this difference in non-professional ballet dancers. In this study we aimed to evaluate active movements of the hip in non-professional classical dancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 10 non professional ballet dancers (16-23 years old). We measured the active range of motion and flexibility through Well Banks. We compared active range of motion between left and right sides (hip flexion and abduction) and performed correlation between active movements and flexibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a small difference between the right and left sides of the hip in relation to the movements of flexion and abduction, which suggest the dominant side of the subjects, however, there was no statistical significance. Bank of Wells test revealed statistical difference only between the 1st and the 3rd measurement. There was no correlation between the movements of the hip (abduction and flexion, right and left sides) with the three test measurements of the bank of Wells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no imbalance between the sides of the hip with respect to active abduction and flexion movements in non-professional ballet dancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":88316,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT","volume":"3 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-2555-3-16","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of movements of lower limbs in non-professional ballet dancers: hip abduction and flexion.\",\"authors\":\"Erica E Valenti,&nbsp;Vitor E Valenti,&nbsp;Celso Ferreira,&nbsp;Luiz Carlos M Vanderlei,&nbsp;Oseas F Moura Filho,&nbsp;Tatiana Dias de Carvalho,&nbsp;Nadir Tassi,&nbsp;Marcio Petenusso,&nbsp;Claudio Leone,&nbsp;Edison N Fujiki,&nbsp;Hugo Macedo Junior,&nbsp;Carlos B de Mello Monteiro,&nbsp;Isadora L Moreno,&nbsp;Ana Clara Cr Gonçalves,&nbsp;Luiz Carlos de Abreu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1758-2555-3-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The literature indicated that the majority of professional ballet dancers present static and active dynamic range of motion difference between left and right lower limbs, however, no previous study focused this difference in non-professional ballet dancers. In this study we aimed to evaluate active movements of the hip in non-professional classical dancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 10 non professional ballet dancers (16-23 years old). We measured the active range of motion and flexibility through Well Banks. We compared active range of motion between left and right sides (hip flexion and abduction) and performed correlation between active movements and flexibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a small difference between the right and left sides of the hip in relation to the movements of flexion and abduction, which suggest the dominant side of the subjects, however, there was no statistical significance. Bank of Wells test revealed statistical difference only between the 1st and the 3rd measurement. There was no correlation between the movements of the hip (abduction and flexion, right and left sides) with the three test measurements of the bank of Wells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no imbalance between the sides of the hip with respect to active abduction and flexion movements in non-professional ballet dancers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-2555-3-16\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-3-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-3-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:文献表明,大多数专业芭蕾舞者存在左右下肢静态动态范围和活动动态范围的差异,而在非专业芭蕾舞者中尚无研究关注这一差异。在本研究中,我们旨在评估非专业古典舞者的髋关节积极运动。方法:对10名非专业芭蕾舞演员(16-23岁)进行评价。我们通过Well Banks测量了活动范围和灵活性。我们比较了左右两侧的活动范围(髋关节屈曲和外展),并进行了活动与灵活性之间的相关性。结果:左右侧髋关节屈曲外展动作差异较小,提示为主体侧,但差异无统计学意义。富国银行测试仅显示了第一次和第三次测量之间的统计差异。髋关节的运动(外展和屈曲,左右两侧)与Wells银行的三个测试测量值之间没有相关性。结论:在非专业芭蕾舞者中,髋关节两侧在主动外展和屈曲动作方面不存在不平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of movements of lower limbs in non-professional ballet dancers: hip abduction and flexion.

Evaluation of movements of lower limbs in non-professional ballet dancers: hip abduction and flexion.

Evaluation of movements of lower limbs in non-professional ballet dancers: hip abduction and flexion.

Evaluation of movements of lower limbs in non-professional ballet dancers: hip abduction and flexion.

Background: The literature indicated that the majority of professional ballet dancers present static and active dynamic range of motion difference between left and right lower limbs, however, no previous study focused this difference in non-professional ballet dancers. In this study we aimed to evaluate active movements of the hip in non-professional classical dancers.

Methods: We evaluated 10 non professional ballet dancers (16-23 years old). We measured the active range of motion and flexibility through Well Banks. We compared active range of motion between left and right sides (hip flexion and abduction) and performed correlation between active movements and flexibility.

Results: There was a small difference between the right and left sides of the hip in relation to the movements of flexion and abduction, which suggest the dominant side of the subjects, however, there was no statistical significance. Bank of Wells test revealed statistical difference only between the 1st and the 3rd measurement. There was no correlation between the movements of the hip (abduction and flexion, right and left sides) with the three test measurements of the bank of Wells.

Conclusion: There is no imbalance between the sides of the hip with respect to active abduction and flexion movements in non-professional ballet dancers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信