手术治疗复发性静脉曲张:微创方法?

Marianne De Maeseneer
{"title":"手术治疗复发性静脉曲张:微创方法?","authors":"Marianne De Maeseneer","doi":"10.1177/1531003511408338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Redo surgery for recurrent varicose veins, involving the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) or saphenopopliteal junction has a bad reputation because it is a laborious, time-consuming intervention, characterized by a high incidence of postoperative complications. Moreover, outcome is worse than after primary surgery. This is illustrated by long-term (5 years) prospective follow-up of 235 reoperated limbs after redo procedure at the SFJ, all performed at the University Hospital of Antwerp between 1991 and 2009. Such invasive redo procedures will soon belong to the past because, nowadays, many less-invasive alternatives are available: phlebectomies without reopening the groin, focusing on the \"varicose reservoir\"; limited redo surgery with combined with foam sclerotherapy; endovenous ablation of a residual refluxing saphenous trunk; ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy; embolization treatment of pelvic vein incompetence; and treatment of an underlying deep-venous obstruction. All these interventions can be performed in an ambulatory setting, without need for general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":87201,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy","volume":"23 4","pages":"244-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1531003511408338","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgery for recurrent varicose veins: toward a less-invasive approach?\",\"authors\":\"Marianne De Maeseneer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1531003511408338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Redo surgery for recurrent varicose veins, involving the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) or saphenopopliteal junction has a bad reputation because it is a laborious, time-consuming intervention, characterized by a high incidence of postoperative complications. Moreover, outcome is worse than after primary surgery. This is illustrated by long-term (5 years) prospective follow-up of 235 reoperated limbs after redo procedure at the SFJ, all performed at the University Hospital of Antwerp between 1991 and 2009. Such invasive redo procedures will soon belong to the past because, nowadays, many less-invasive alternatives are available: phlebectomies without reopening the groin, focusing on the \\\"varicose reservoir\\\"; limited redo surgery with combined with foam sclerotherapy; endovenous ablation of a residual refluxing saphenous trunk; ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy; embolization treatment of pelvic vein incompetence; and treatment of an underlying deep-venous obstruction. All these interventions can be performed in an ambulatory setting, without need for general anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"244-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1531003511408338\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1531003511408338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1531003511408338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

对于复发性静脉曲张,累及隐股交界处(SFJ)或隐腘交界处的重做手术有着不好的名声,因为这是一项费力、耗时的干预,其特点是术后并发症的发生率高。此外,结果比初次手术后更差。1991年至2009年期间,安特卫普大学医院在SFJ进行了235例肢体再手术后的长期(5年)前瞻性随访,证明了这一点。这种侵入性的重做手术将很快成为过去,因为现在有许多侵入性更小的替代方法:不重新打开腹股沟的静脉切除术,专注于“静脉曲张储层”;有限重做手术联合泡沫硬化疗法;静脉内消融残余返流性隐静脉干超声引导泡沫硬化疗法;盆腔静脉功能不全的栓塞治疗治疗潜在的深静脉阻塞。所有这些干预都可以在门诊环境中进行,而不需要全身麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgery for recurrent varicose veins: toward a less-invasive approach?

Redo surgery for recurrent varicose veins, involving the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) or saphenopopliteal junction has a bad reputation because it is a laborious, time-consuming intervention, characterized by a high incidence of postoperative complications. Moreover, outcome is worse than after primary surgery. This is illustrated by long-term (5 years) prospective follow-up of 235 reoperated limbs after redo procedure at the SFJ, all performed at the University Hospital of Antwerp between 1991 and 2009. Such invasive redo procedures will soon belong to the past because, nowadays, many less-invasive alternatives are available: phlebectomies without reopening the groin, focusing on the "varicose reservoir"; limited redo surgery with combined with foam sclerotherapy; endovenous ablation of a residual refluxing saphenous trunk; ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy; embolization treatment of pelvic vein incompetence; and treatment of an underlying deep-venous obstruction. All these interventions can be performed in an ambulatory setting, without need for general anesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信