联邦巡回法院歧视分析:合成生物学中DNA和生物技术发明的书面描述要求的演变。

Dov Greenbaum
{"title":"联邦巡回法院歧视分析:合成生物学中DNA和生物技术发明的书面描述要求的演变。","authors":"Dov Greenbaum","doi":"10.2174/187221511797636284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Federal Circuit uses particular patent doctrines as policy levers to control the nature of the nation's patent output. To this end, the Court will actively discriminate in it's application of the Patent Act, depending on the nature of the technology before it. One example of such a lever is the written description doctrine. Most recently, the court has looked to this doctrine in an effort to limit the scope of biotechnology patents in general and DNA patents in particular. This paper provides a cursory review of this law regarding the enigmatic written description requirement, examining particularly its history and purposes. It then examines some of the recent cases that allude to the Federal Circuit's particular efforts in the biotechnology industry. Finally, it presents a potentially problematic technology for future implementation of discriminatory practices by the court.</p>","PeriodicalId":74646,"journal":{"name":"Recent patents on DNA & gene sequences","volume":"5 3","pages":"153-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/187221511797636284","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of federal circuit discrimination: the evolution of the written description requirement vis-a-vis DNA and biotechnological inventions concerns for synthetic biology.\",\"authors\":\"Dov Greenbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/187221511797636284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Federal Circuit uses particular patent doctrines as policy levers to control the nature of the nation's patent output. To this end, the Court will actively discriminate in it's application of the Patent Act, depending on the nature of the technology before it. One example of such a lever is the written description doctrine. Most recently, the court has looked to this doctrine in an effort to limit the scope of biotechnology patents in general and DNA patents in particular. This paper provides a cursory review of this law regarding the enigmatic written description requirement, examining particularly its history and purposes. It then examines some of the recent cases that allude to the Federal Circuit's particular efforts in the biotechnology industry. Finally, it presents a potentially problematic technology for future implementation of discriminatory practices by the court.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recent patents on DNA & gene sequences\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"153-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/187221511797636284\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recent patents on DNA & gene sequences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/187221511797636284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent patents on DNA & gene sequences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/187221511797636284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

联邦巡回法院使用特定的专利原则作为政策杠杆来控制国家专利产出的性质。为此,法院将根据其面临的技术的性质,积极地区别对待《专利法》的适用。这种杠杆的一个例子是书面描述原则。最近,最高法院在试图限制生物技术专利,特别是DNA专利的范围时,考虑到了这一原则。本文提供了一个关于神秘的书面描述要求这一法律的粗略审查,特别是审查其历史和目的。然后,它考察了最近的一些案件,这些案件暗示了联邦巡回法院在生物技术行业的特殊努力。最后,它为法院未来实施歧视性做法提供了一种潜在的问题技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analysis of federal circuit discrimination: the evolution of the written description requirement vis-a-vis DNA and biotechnological inventions concerns for synthetic biology.

The Federal Circuit uses particular patent doctrines as policy levers to control the nature of the nation's patent output. To this end, the Court will actively discriminate in it's application of the Patent Act, depending on the nature of the technology before it. One example of such a lever is the written description doctrine. Most recently, the court has looked to this doctrine in an effort to limit the scope of biotechnology patents in general and DNA patents in particular. This paper provides a cursory review of this law regarding the enigmatic written description requirement, examining particularly its history and purposes. It then examines some of the recent cases that allude to the Federal Circuit's particular efforts in the biotechnology industry. Finally, it presents a potentially problematic technology for future implementation of discriminatory practices by the court.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信