Kyoung-Jin Park, Eui-Hoon Kwon, Hee-Jin Kim, Sun-Hee Kim
{"title":"纤维蛋白单体在弥散性血管内凝血诊断中的价值评价。","authors":"Kyoung-Jin Park, Eui-Hoon Kwon, Hee-Jin Kim, Sun-Hee Kim","doi":"10.3343/kjlm.2011.31.3.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibrin-related markers (FRM) such as fibrin monomer (FM) and D-dimer (DD) are considered useful biological markers for the diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, no studies on the diagnostic performance of different FRMs have been published in Korea. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FM for DIC in comparison with DD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The reference limit of FM was determined based on plasma sample data obtained from 210 control individuals. To evaluate diagnostic performance, FM data from the plasma samples of 139 patients with DIC-associated diseases were obtained for DIC scoring. FM was measured by immunoturbidimetry using STA-LIATEST FM (Diagnostica Stago, France). Patients were classified according to the DIC score as non-DIC, non-overt DIC, or overt DIC. ROC curve analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reference limit in the control individuals was determined to be 7.80 µg/mL. Patients with DIC-associated diseases were categorized as non-DIC (N=43), non-overt DIC (N=80), and overt DIC (N=16). ROC curve analyses showed that the diagnostic performance of FM was comparable to DD in both non-overt DIC and overt DIC (P=0.596 and 0.553, respectively). In addition, FM had higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value than DD for differentiating overt DIC from non-DIC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that the diagnostic performance of FM for DIC was comparable to DD. FM might be more sensitive and more specific than DD in the diagnosis of overt DIC, but not non-overt DIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17890,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"31 3","pages":"143-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3343/kjlm.2011.31.3.143","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of fibrin monomer in disseminated intravascular coagulation.\",\"authors\":\"Kyoung-Jin Park, Eui-Hoon Kwon, Hee-Jin Kim, Sun-Hee Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3343/kjlm.2011.31.3.143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibrin-related markers (FRM) such as fibrin monomer (FM) and D-dimer (DD) are considered useful biological markers for the diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, no studies on the diagnostic performance of different FRMs have been published in Korea. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FM for DIC in comparison with DD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The reference limit of FM was determined based on plasma sample data obtained from 210 control individuals. To evaluate diagnostic performance, FM data from the plasma samples of 139 patients with DIC-associated diseases were obtained for DIC scoring. FM was measured by immunoturbidimetry using STA-LIATEST FM (Diagnostica Stago, France). Patients were classified according to the DIC score as non-DIC, non-overt DIC, or overt DIC. ROC curve analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reference limit in the control individuals was determined to be 7.80 µg/mL. Patients with DIC-associated diseases were categorized as non-DIC (N=43), non-overt DIC (N=80), and overt DIC (N=16). ROC curve analyses showed that the diagnostic performance of FM was comparable to DD in both non-overt DIC and overt DIC (P=0.596 and 0.553, respectively). In addition, FM had higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value than DD for differentiating overt DIC from non-DIC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that the diagnostic performance of FM for DIC was comparable to DD. FM might be more sensitive and more specific than DD in the diagnosis of overt DIC, but not non-overt DIC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"143-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3343/kjlm.2011.31.3.143\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2011.31.3.143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2011.31.3.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
摘要
背景:纤维蛋白相关标志物(FRM),如纤维蛋白单体(FM)和d -二聚体(DD)被认为是诊断弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)的有用生物标志物。然而,韩国尚未发表关于不同FRMs诊断性能的研究。本研究的目的是评价FM对DIC的诊断价值,并与dd进行比较。方法:根据210例对照患者的血浆样本数据确定FM的参考限。为了评估诊断性能,从139例DIC相关疾病患者的血浆样本中获取FM数据进行DIC评分。FM采用STA-LIATEST FM (Diagnostica Stago, France)的免疫比浊法测定。根据DIC评分将患者分为非DIC、非显性DIC和显性DIC。进行ROC曲线分析。结果:确定对照个体的参考限为7.80µg/mL。伴有DIC相关疾病的患者分为非DIC (N=43)、非显性DIC (N=80)和显性DIC (N=16)。ROC曲线分析显示FM对非显性DIC和显性DIC的诊断效果与DD相当(P值分别为0.596和0.553)。此外,FM在区分显性DIC与非DIC的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值均高于DD。结论:本研究表明FM对DIC的诊断性能与DD相当,FM对显性DIC的诊断可能比DD更敏感、更特异,但对非显性DIC的诊断则不然。
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of fibrin monomer in disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Background: Fibrin-related markers (FRM) such as fibrin monomer (FM) and D-dimer (DD) are considered useful biological markers for the diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, no studies on the diagnostic performance of different FRMs have been published in Korea. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FM for DIC in comparison with DD.
Methods: The reference limit of FM was determined based on plasma sample data obtained from 210 control individuals. To evaluate diagnostic performance, FM data from the plasma samples of 139 patients with DIC-associated diseases were obtained for DIC scoring. FM was measured by immunoturbidimetry using STA-LIATEST FM (Diagnostica Stago, France). Patients were classified according to the DIC score as non-DIC, non-overt DIC, or overt DIC. ROC curve analyses were performed.
Results: The reference limit in the control individuals was determined to be 7.80 µg/mL. Patients with DIC-associated diseases were categorized as non-DIC (N=43), non-overt DIC (N=80), and overt DIC (N=16). ROC curve analyses showed that the diagnostic performance of FM was comparable to DD in both non-overt DIC and overt DIC (P=0.596 and 0.553, respectively). In addition, FM had higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value than DD for differentiating overt DIC from non-DIC.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the diagnostic performance of FM for DIC was comparable to DD. FM might be more sensitive and more specific than DD in the diagnosis of overt DIC, but not non-overt DIC.