使用国家统计局的纵向研究估计生育率——包括非常住人口会有什么不同?

James Robards, Ann Berrington, Andrew Hinde
{"title":"使用国家统计局的纵向研究估计生育率——包括非常住人口会有什么不同?","authors":"James Robards,&nbsp;Ann Berrington,&nbsp;Andrew Hinde","doi":"10.1057/pt.2011.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among datasets available for fertility research in England and Wales, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Longitudinal Study (LS) is unique in its construction and scale. The large number of individuals who are part of the study means that it is an important dataset for estimating fertility trends in England and Wales by age and parity. This article uses the LS to estimate age-specific fertility rates (ASFRs) for England and Wales between 1991 and 2001. This necessitates great care to ensure that the exposure to risk of birth for female LS members is fully understood. To achieve this, two forms of residential history are defined - consistent cases where the residential information for the LS member is potentially complete for the whole decade and inconsistent cases where there is certainly some form of incompleteness in the residence information. By considering 'all consistent cases', that is both the continuously resident plus those who are not continuously resident but appear to have a complete residential history, we obtain ASFRs which are slightly lower than official statistics figures, but closer to these official figures than ASFRs produced when restricting the sample to LS members who remain continuously resident between 1991 and 2001. The fertility of those consistent cases who are not continuously resident is substantially higher than the rates of continuously resident cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":79419,"journal":{"name":"Population trends","volume":" 144","pages":"30-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1057/pt.2011.10","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating fertility rates using the ONS Longitudinal Study--what difference does the inclusion of non-continually resident members make?\",\"authors\":\"James Robards,&nbsp;Ann Berrington,&nbsp;Andrew Hinde\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/pt.2011.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Among datasets available for fertility research in England and Wales, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Longitudinal Study (LS) is unique in its construction and scale. The large number of individuals who are part of the study means that it is an important dataset for estimating fertility trends in England and Wales by age and parity. This article uses the LS to estimate age-specific fertility rates (ASFRs) for England and Wales between 1991 and 2001. This necessitates great care to ensure that the exposure to risk of birth for female LS members is fully understood. To achieve this, two forms of residential history are defined - consistent cases where the residential information for the LS member is potentially complete for the whole decade and inconsistent cases where there is certainly some form of incompleteness in the residence information. By considering 'all consistent cases', that is both the continuously resident plus those who are not continuously resident but appear to have a complete residential history, we obtain ASFRs which are slightly lower than official statistics figures, but closer to these official figures than ASFRs produced when restricting the sample to LS members who remain continuously resident between 1991 and 2001. The fertility of those consistent cases who are not continuously resident is substantially higher than the rates of continuously resident cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population trends\",\"volume\":\" 144\",\"pages\":\"30-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1057/pt.2011.10\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/pt.2011.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/pt.2011.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在英格兰和威尔士可用于生育研究的数据集中,国家统计局(ONS)纵向研究(LS)的结构和规模是独一无二的。大量的个体参与了这项研究,这意味着它是一个重要的数据集,可以根据年龄和胎次来估计英格兰和威尔士的生育趋势。本文使用LS来估计1991年至2001年间英格兰和威尔士的年龄特定生育率(ASFRs)。这需要非常小心,以确保充分了解女性LS成员的生育风险。为了实现这一点,定义了两种形式的居住历史——一致的情况下,LS成员的居住信息在整个十年中可能是完整的,而不一致的情况下,居住信息中肯定存在某种形式的不完整。通过考虑“所有一致的情况”,即连续居住加上那些不是连续居住但似乎有完整居住历史的人,我们得到的ASFRs略低于官方统计数据,但比将样本限制为1991年至2001年期间连续居住的LS成员时产生的ASFRs更接近这些官方数据。那些不连续居住的一致性病例的生育率大大高于连续居住病例的生育率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating fertility rates using the ONS Longitudinal Study--what difference does the inclusion of non-continually resident members make?

Among datasets available for fertility research in England and Wales, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Longitudinal Study (LS) is unique in its construction and scale. The large number of individuals who are part of the study means that it is an important dataset for estimating fertility trends in England and Wales by age and parity. This article uses the LS to estimate age-specific fertility rates (ASFRs) for England and Wales between 1991 and 2001. This necessitates great care to ensure that the exposure to risk of birth for female LS members is fully understood. To achieve this, two forms of residential history are defined - consistent cases where the residential information for the LS member is potentially complete for the whole decade and inconsistent cases where there is certainly some form of incompleteness in the residence information. By considering 'all consistent cases', that is both the continuously resident plus those who are not continuously resident but appear to have a complete residential history, we obtain ASFRs which are slightly lower than official statistics figures, but closer to these official figures than ASFRs produced when restricting the sample to LS members who remain continuously resident between 1991 and 2001. The fertility of those consistent cases who are not continuously resident is substantially higher than the rates of continuously resident cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信